ADBE vs AMGN Stock Comparison
Compare ADBE and AMGN across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ADBE and AMGN?
ADBE leads the current stock comparison as Adobe Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Adobe Inc. vs Amgen Inc.
ADBE leads
ADBE leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, and the lead has widened from 9 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support ADBE, and its lead is widening.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ADBE over AMGN, 56 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. ADBE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality. ADBE also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ADBE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. ADBE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Adobe Inc. and Amgen Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ADBE and AMGN against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value68 vs 44ADBE +24
- Quality91 vs 70ADBE +21
- Momentum13 vs 15Even
- Risk Resilience37 vs 39Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor ADBE. ADBE’s edge is concentrated in value and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -19
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
ADBE's lead narrowed by 5 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ADBE and AMGN both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ADBE (Adobe Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
AMGN (Amgen Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ADBEADBE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AMGNAMGN on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ADBEADBE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
AMGNAMGN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
ADBEADBE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ADBE | AMGN | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.5% | -0.2% | ADBE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +69.7% | +61.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 19 | 18 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ADBE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ADBE | 56 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | AMGNon balance | revenue growth 3.4% vs 16.7%; EPS growth -7.6% vs 30.6%; TTM ROE 62.4% vs 89.3%; gross margin 89.1% vs 72.7%; operating margin 36.1% vs 33.2% — AMGN takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | ADBE | Value 68 vs 44 |
| Technicals | AMGN | Price vs 50-day 0.2% vs -5.4%; vs 200-day -6.8% vs 6.5% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 37 vs 39 |
| Analyst expectations | ADBE | Target upside 7.5% vs -0.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ADBE and AMGN and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ADBE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10ADBE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ADBE +12
- 56 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- ADBE +9
- 67 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- ADBE +9
- 72 vs 63
- 90 sessions ago
- ADBE +9
- 70 vs 61
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Jun 22 when AMGN moved ahead of ADBE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (6.03%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
4 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.03%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
AMGN is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 5 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.37%, AIQ -5 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.34%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AMGN closes the Value gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to ADBE's edge.
- 2AMGN's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3ADBE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AMGN leads on balance| Metric | ADBE | AMGN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.4% | 16.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -7.6% | 30.6% |
| Gross margin | 89.1% | 72.7% |
| Operating margin | 36.1% | 33.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 62.4% | 89.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.61 | 4.9 |
Performance
AMGN leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | ADBE | AMGN |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -11.1% | -8.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.8% | -8.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 6.6% | 13.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -9.1% | 1.3% |
| Year to date | -28.9% | 16.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -30.6% | 36.5% |
Technicals
AMGN has the stronger structure| Metric | ADBE | AMGN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 35.7 | 24.4 |
| ADX (14) | 22.5 | 40 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.2% | -5.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -6.8% | 6.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 48.9% | 40.9% |
Risk
Split| Metric | ADBE | AMGN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.37 | 0.54 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.78 | 1.07 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.13 | 1.64 |
| Max drawdown | -47.4% | -16.6% |
| Current drawdown | -32.3% | -13.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 40.2% | 29.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.3% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ADBE or AMGN?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ADBE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 56 against AMGN's 44. The edge comes from value and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ADBE or AMGN the better buy right now?
ADBE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ADBE over AMGN?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ADBE leads Value by 24 points; ADBE leads Quality by 21 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ADBE or AMGN?
Analyst price targets imply +7.5% upside for ADBE and -0.2% for AMGN, so the Street currently favors ADBE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ADBE or AMGN?
ADBE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ADBE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ADBE or AMGN?
AMGN on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ADBE or AMGN?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ADBE or AMGN?
AMGN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AMGN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ADBE more profitable than AMGN?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 89.1% vs 72.7%; operating margin 36.1% vs 33.2%; ttm roe 62.4% vs 89.3%. ADBE leads on two measures and AMGN on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is ADBE's lead over AMGN getting stronger or weaker?
ADBE lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-22, when AMGN moved ahead of ADBE.
What would change the ADBE vs AMGN verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AMGN closes the Value gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to ADBE's edge; AMGN's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; ADBE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ADBE and AMGN?
ADBE: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 1 neutral. AMGN: 4 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ADBE is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On AMGN it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ADBE and AMGN with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.