ADBE vs SAP Stock Comparison
SAP currently leads ADBE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 68 vs 67. The clearest difference is momentum, while ADBE has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between ADBE and SAP?
SAP leads the current stock comparison as SAP SE, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Adobe Inc. vs SAP SE
SAP leads
SAP leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support SAP, and its current signal state is conflicted.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SAP over ADBE, 68 versus 67 as of Oct 31, 2026. SAP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while ADBE holds the stronger value profile. SAP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SAP today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. SAP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Adobe Inc. and SAP SE across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ADBE and SAP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum51 vs 83SAP +32
- Risk Resilience42 vs 66SAP +24
- Value68 vs 50ADBE +18
- Quality91 vs 74ADBE +17
3 of 6 evidence groups favor SAP. SAP’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; ADBE keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
SAP's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ADBE and SAP both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SAP (SAP SE): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
ADBE (Adobe Inc.): the counter-case, on value, quality, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 42.1% against 18%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SAPSAP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SAPSAP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ADBEADBE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
SAPSAP on the Momentum factor, by 32 points.
Lower downside
SAPSAP on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
SAPSAP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ADBE | SAP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +6.1% | +28.9% | SAP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +71.2% | +205.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 18 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SAP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 67 vs 68 |
| Fundamentals | ADBEon balance | revenue growth 3.4% vs 3.4%; EPS growth -7.6% vs 2.6%; TTM ROE 62.4% vs 17.8%; gross margin 89.1% vs 72.8%; operating margin 36.1% vs 27.4% — ADBE takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | ADBE | Value 68 vs 50 |
| Technicals | SAP | Price vs 50-day -2% vs 8.2%; vs 200-day -0.5% vs 23.6% |
| Risk Resilience | SAP | Risk Resilience 42 vs 66 |
| Analyst expectations | SAP | Target upside 6.1% vs 28.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ADBE and SAP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SAP.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28SAP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SAP +1
- 67 vs 68
- 7 sessions ago
- ADBE +4
- 76 vs 72
- 30 sessions ago
- SAP +3
- 60 vs 63
- 90 sessions ago
- ADBE +3
- 71 vs 68
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 20 when ADBE moved ahead of SAP.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only ADBE
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.63%)
5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only SAP
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
SAP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.85%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.41%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ADBE closes the Momentum gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to SAP's edge.
- 2ADBE's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SAP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ADBE leads on balance| Metric | ADBE | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -7.6% | 2.6% |
| Gross margin | 89.1% | 72.8% |
| Operating margin | 36.1% | 27.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 62.4% | 17.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.61 | 0.23 |
Performance
SAP leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | ADBE | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.1% | 1.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 4.1% | 13.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 0.8% | 31% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.5% | 37.8% |
| Year to date | -28.6% | -2.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -29.4% | -12.9% |
Technicals
SAP has the stronger structure| Metric | ADBE | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 55.4 | 83.7 |
| ADX (14) | 17.2 | 32 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2% | 8.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.5% | 23.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 42.1% | 18% |
Risk
SAP is the more resilient| Metric | ADBE | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.24 | 0.62 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.76 | -0.25 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.16 | -0.33 |
| Max drawdown | -46.3% | -45.8% |
| Current drawdown | -30.6% | -12.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 41.9% | 38.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.4% | -3.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ADBE or SAP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SAP is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 68 against ADBE's 67. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. ADBE is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ADBE or SAP the better buy right now?
SAP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SAP over ADBE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SAP leads Momentum by 32 points; SAP leads Risk Resilience by 24 points; ADBE leads Value by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ADBE or SAP?
Analyst price targets imply +6.1% upside for ADBE and +28.9% for SAP, so the Street currently favors SAP. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ADBE or SAP?
ADBE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ADBE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ADBE or SAP?
SAP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ADBE or SAP?
SAP on the Momentum factor, by 32 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ADBE or SAP?
SAP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SAP on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ADBE more profitable than SAP?
ADBE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 89.1% vs 72.8%; operating margin 36.1% vs 27.4%; ttm roe 62.4% vs 17.8%.
Is SAP's lead over ADBE getting stronger or weaker?
SAP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-20, when ADBE moved ahead of SAP.
What would change the ADBE vs SAP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ADBE closes the Momentum gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to SAP's edge; ADBE's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SAP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ADBE and SAP?
ADBE: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SAP: 5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ADBE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SAP it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ADBE and SAP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.