ADBE vs VEEV Stock Comparison
Compare ADBE and VEEV across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ADBE and VEEV?
ADBE leads the current stock comparison as Adobe Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Adobe Inc. vs Veeva Systems Inc.
ADBE leads
ADBE leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support ADBE.
Adobe Inc.
Veeva Systems Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ADBE over VEEV, 67 versus 64 as of Sep 6, 2026. ADBE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while VEEV holds the stronger momentum profile. ADBE also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ADBE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. ADBE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Adobe Inc. and Veeva Systems Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ADBE and VEEV against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%68 vs 38ADBE +30
- Momentum25%56 vs 85VEEV +29
- Risk Resilience15%37 vs 62VEEV +25
- Quality30%91 vs 74ADBE +17
3 of 6 evidence groups favor ADBE. ADBE’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; VEEV keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
ADBE's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ADBE and VEEV both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ADBE (Adobe Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
VEEV (Veeva Systems Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 64% against 49.6%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ADBEADBE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
VEEVVEEV on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ADBEADBE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points.
Momentum
VEEVVEEV on the Momentum factor, by 29 points.
Lower downside
VEEVVEEV on Risk Resilience, by 25 points.
Analyst upside
ADBEADBE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ADBE | VEEV | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +3.8% | -0.9% | ADBE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +92.9% | +60.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 19 | 20 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ADBE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 67 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | ADBEon balance | revenue growth 3.4% vs 5.1%; EPS growth -7.6% vs 5%; TTM ROE 62.4% vs 14%; gross margin 89.1% vs 74.9%; operating margin 36.1% vs 29.9% — ADBE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | ADBE | Value 68 vs 38 |
| Technicals | VEEV | Price vs 50-day 7.1% vs 25%; vs 200-day -0.5% vs 38.5% |
| Risk Resilience | VEEV | Risk Resilience 37 vs 62 |
| Analyst expectations | ADBE | Target upside 3.8% vs -0.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ADBE and VEEV and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ADBE.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5ADBE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ADBE +3
- 67 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- ADBE +10
- 75 vs 65
- 30 sessions ago
- ADBE +4
- 71 vs 67
- 90 sessions ago
- ADBE +1
- 66 vs 65
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jul 2 when ADBE moved ahead of VEEV.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.67%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.21%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (10.77%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -6.73%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.27%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1VEEV closes the Value gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to ADBE's edge.
- 2VEEV's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3ADBE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ADBE leads on balance| Metric | ADBE | VEEV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.4% | 5.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -7.6% | 5% |
| Gross margin | 89.1% | 74.9% |
| Operating margin | 36.1% | 29.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 62.4% | 14% |
| Debt to equity | 0.61 | 0.02 |
Performance
VEEV leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | ADBE | VEEV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -8.6% | -0.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.5% | 19.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 6% | 59.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -6% | 40.7% |
| Year to date | -23.9% | 23.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -23.5% | 1.5% |
Technicals
VEEV has the stronger structure| Metric | ADBE | VEEV |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.5 | 69.9 |
| ADX (14) | 24.6 | 50.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 7.1% | 25% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.5% | 38.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 49.6% | 64% |
Risk
VEEV is the more resilient| Metric | ADBE | VEEV |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.34 | 0.6 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.54 | 0.16 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.78 | 0.27 |
| Max drawdown | -47.4% | -50.5% |
| Current drawdown | -27.5% | -10.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 40.1% | 42.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.3% | -3.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ADBE or VEEV?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ADBE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 67 against VEEV's 64. The edge comes from value and quality. VEEV is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ADBE or VEEV the better buy right now?
ADBE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ADBE over VEEV?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. ADBE leads Value by 30 points; VEEV leads Momentum by 29 points; VEEV leads Risk Resilience by 25 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ADBE or VEEV?
Analyst price targets imply +3.8% upside for ADBE and -0.9% for VEEV, so the Street currently favors ADBE. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ADBE or VEEV?
ADBE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ADBE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ADBE or VEEV?
VEEV on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ADBE or VEEV?
VEEV on the Momentum factor, by 29 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ADBE or VEEV?
VEEV is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VEEV on Risk Resilience, by 25 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ADBE more profitable than VEEV?
ADBE leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 89.1% vs 74.9%; operating margin 36.1% vs 29.9%; ttm roe 62.4% vs 14%.
Is ADBE's lead over VEEV getting stronger or weaker?
ADBE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-07-02, when ADBE moved ahead of VEEV.
What would change the ADBE vs VEEV verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: VEEV closes the Value gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to ADBE's edge; VEEV's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; ADBE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ADBE and VEEV?
ADBE: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral. VEEV: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on ADBE is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On VEEV it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ADBE and VEEV with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.