ALGN vs AVGO Stock Comparison
Compare ALGN and AVGO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ALGN and AVGO?
ALGN leads the current stock comparison as Align Technology, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Align Technology, Inc. vs Broadcom Inc.
ALGN leads
ALGN leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Value, but the lead has narrowed from 9 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors AVGO on target upside.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support ALGN, and its lead is narrowing.
Align Technology, Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ALGN over AVGO, 54 versus 52 as of Sep 11, 2026. ALGN's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while AVGO holds the stronger quality profile. ALGN also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AVGO. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ALGN today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. ALGN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Align Technology, Inc. and Broadcom Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ALGN and AVGO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value63 vs 30ALGN +33
- Quality70 vs 85AVGO +15
- Momentum28 vs 39AVGO +11
- Risk Resilience49 vs 52Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor ALGN. ALGN’s edge is concentrated in value; AVGO keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
ALGN's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ALGN and AVGO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ALGN (Align Technology, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, fundamentals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ALGNALGN on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AVGOAVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ALGNALGN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 33 points.
Momentum
AVGOAVGO on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
ALGNALGN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
AVGOAVGO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ALGN, analyst targets favor AVGO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | ALGN | AVGO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +36.1% | +39.4% | AVGO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.9% | +49.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 17 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ALGN. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 54 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | AVGO | revenue growth 1.5% vs 14.9%; EPS growth -4.4% vs 26.5%; TTM ROE 10.1% vs 36.4%; gross margin 66.5% vs 67%; operating margin 13.3% vs 43.7% |
| Valuation | ALGN | Value 63 vs 30 |
| Technicals | AVGO | Price vs 50-day -11.3% vs -5.5%; vs 200-day -10.4% vs -2.5% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 49 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | AVGO | Target upside 36.1% vs 39.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ALGN and AVGO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ALGN.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10ALGN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ALGN +2
- 54 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- ALGN +7
- 54 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- ALGN +9
- 54 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- ALGN +13
- 63 vs 50
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 13 when ALGN moved ahead of AVGO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.42%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.68%)
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.55%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
AVGO is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.07%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.32%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AVGO closes the Value gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to ALGN's edge.
- 2AVGO's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3ALGN starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate ALGN's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AVGO leads on balance| Metric | ALGN | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 1.5% | 14.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -4.4% | 26.5% |
| Gross margin | 66.5% | 67% |
| Operating margin | 13.3% | 43.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.1% | 36.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.03 | 0.74 |
Performance
AVGO leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | ALGN | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.3% | -1.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.4% | -13.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -11.6% | -3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -13.8% | 5.6% |
| Year to date | -3.5% | 4.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 10.1% | 6.9% |
Technicals
AVGO has the stronger structure| Metric | ALGN | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.1 | 47.7 |
| ADX (14) | 21.6 | 23.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -11.3% | -5.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -10.4% | -2.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 34.8% | 37.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | ALGN | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.41 | 2.16 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.36 | 0.3 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.61 | 0.44 |
| Max drawdown | -23.7% | -28.9% |
| Current drawdown | -23.7% | -25.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 39.3% | 47.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -4.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ALGN or AVGO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ALGN is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 54 against AVGO's 52. The edge comes from value. AVGO is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ALGN or AVGO the better buy right now?
ALGN carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ALGN over AVGO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ALGN leads Value by 33 points; AVGO leads Quality by 15 points; AVGO leads Momentum by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ALGN or AVGO?
Analyst price targets imply +36.1% upside for ALGN and +39.4% for AVGO, so the Street currently favors AVGO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ALGN. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ALGN or AVGO?
ALGN is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ALGN on the peer-relative Value factor, by 33 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ALGN or AVGO?
AVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ALGN or AVGO?
AVGO on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ALGN or AVGO?
ALGN is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ALGN carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ALGN more profitable than AVGO?
AVGO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 66.5% vs 67%; operating margin 13.3% vs 43.7%; ttm roe 10.1% vs 36.4%.
Is ALGN's lead over AVGO getting stronger or weaker?
ALGN lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-13, when ALGN moved ahead of AVGO.
What would change the ALGN vs AVGO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AVGO closes the Value gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to ALGN's edge; AVGO's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; ALGN starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate ALGN's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about ALGN and AVGO?
ALGN: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. AVGO: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ALGN is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On AVGO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ALGN and AVGO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.