AMDY vs INTC Stock Comparison
INTC currently leads AMDY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 30 vs 27. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between AMDY and INTC?
INTC leads the current stock comparison as Intel Corp., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF vs Intel Corp.
INTC leads
INTC leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from AMDY.
Fragile: 2 of 3 evidence groups support INTC, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors INTC over AMDY, 30 versus 27 as of Oct 21, 2026. INTC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience. INTC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor INTC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. INTC lead: Reversed — AMDY led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; INTC now leads by 3.
Compare YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AMDY and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience8 vs 29INTC +21
- Quality42 vs 39Even
- Momentum21 vs 21Even
2 of 3 evidence groups favor INTC. INTC’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
INTC's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMDY and INTC both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
INTCINTC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
INTCINTC on Risk Resilience, by 21 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMDY | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +18.2% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +122.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor INTC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 27 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Not covered | Not covered |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -5.1% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -1.9% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | INTC | Risk Resilience 8 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMDY and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on INTC.
How the comparison changed
99 daily snapshots · Jun 22 – Oct 20INTC lead: Reversed — AMDY led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; INTC now leads by 3.
- Today
- INTC +3
- 27 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- INTC +1
- 29 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- AMDY +4
- 47 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- INTC +7
- 30 vs 37
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 14 when INTC moved ahead of AMDY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only AMDY
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 5 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, MACD Bearish Crossover.
INTC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.05%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AMDY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to INTC's edge.
- 2AMDY's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3INTC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | AMDY | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | — | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | — | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | AMDY | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -13% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -18.7% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -20.4% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 10.8% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | 13% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -10% | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | AMDY | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 24.1 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 21.1 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.1% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.9% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 39% | 46.6% |
Risk
INTC is the more resilient| Metric | AMDY | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.72 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.05 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.07 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -42% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -27.8% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 58.6% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.3% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMDY or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, INTC is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 30 against AMDY's 27. The edge comes from risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMDY or INTC the better buy right now?
INTC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 3 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor INTC over AMDY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INTC leads Risk Resilience by 21 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AMDY or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for AMDY and +18.2% for INTC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMDY or INTC?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMDY or INTC?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMDY or INTC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMDY or INTC?
INTC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. INTC on Risk Resilience, by 21 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMDY more profitable than INTC?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is INTC's lead over AMDY getting stronger or weaker?
INTC lead: Reversed — AMDY led by 4 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; INTC now leads by 3. This is measured from 99 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-22 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-14, when INTC moved ahead of AMDY.
What would change the AMDY vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AMDY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to INTC's edge; AMDY's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; INTC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AMDY and INTC?
AMDY: 2 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AMDY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.