AMLP vs AVGO Stock Comparison
AMLP currently leads AVGO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 49. The clearest difference is value, while AVGO has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between AMLP and AVGO?
AMLP leads the current stock comparison as Alerian MLP ETF, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Alerian MLP ETF vs Broadcom Inc.
AMLP leads
AMLP leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from AVGO.
Competitive: 4 of 4 evidence groups support AMLP, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Alerian MLP ETF
Broadcom Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AMLP over AVGO, 56 versus 49 as of Oct 21, 2026. AMLP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while AVGO holds the stronger quality profile. AMLP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 4 covered evidence groups favor AMLP today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. AMLP lead: Reversed — AVGO led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AMLP now leads by 7.
Compare Alerian MLP ETF and Broadcom Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AMLP and AVGO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value61 vs 30AMLP +31
- Quality59 vs 85AVGO +26
- Momentum47 vs 27AMLP +20
- Risk Resilience58 vs 53AMLP +5
4 of 4 evidence groups favor AMLP. AMLP’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; AVGO keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
AMLP's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMLP and AVGO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.): the counter-case, on quality — but at materially higher volatility, 36.5% against 14%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AMLPAMLP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
AMLPAMLP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 31 points.
Momentum
AMLPAMLP on the Momentum factor, by 20 points.
Lower downside
AMLPAMLP on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMLP | AVGO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +48.9% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +49.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 18 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 4 covered evidence groups favor AMLP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AMLP | 56 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | AMLP | Value 61 vs 30 |
| Technicals | AMLP | Price vs 50-day -2.8% vs -6.7%; vs 200-day -0.1% vs -9.1% |
| Risk Resilience | AMLP | Risk Resilience 58 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMLP and AVGO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- 4 of 4 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AMLP.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20AMLP lead: Reversed — AVGO led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AMLP now leads by 7.
- Today
- AMLP +7
- 56 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- AMLP +1
- 53 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- AVGO +2
- 51 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- AMLP +3
- 60 vs 57
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Oct 12 when AMLP moved ahead of AVGO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
Only AMLP
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.84%)
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.42%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish
Only AVGO
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.65%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.1%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.03%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AVGO closes the Value gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to AMLP's edge.
- 2AVGO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3AMLP's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | AMLP | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 14.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 26.5% |
| Gross margin | — | 67% |
| Operating margin | — | 43.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 36.4% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.74 |
Performance
AMLP leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | AMLP | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.2% | -6.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2% | -8.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4% | -15.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.2% | -16.4% |
| Year to date | 11.9% | -3.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 15.7% | -5.6% |
Technicals
AMLP has the stronger structure| Metric | AMLP | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 56.1 | 41.8 |
| ADX (14) | 39.2 | 21.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.8% | -6.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.1% | -9.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14% | 36.5% |
Risk
AMLP is the more resilient| Metric | AMLP | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.15 | 2.16 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.85 | 0.05 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.31 | 0.07 |
| Max drawdown | -8.1% | -31.7% |
| Current drawdown | -6.4% | -30.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 13.2% | 45.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.3% | -4.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMLP or AVGO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AMLP is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 56 against AVGO's 49. The edge comes from value and momentum. AVGO is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMLP or AVGO the better buy right now?
AMLP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AMLP over AVGO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AMLP leads Value by 31 points; AVGO leads Quality by 26 points; AMLP leads Momentum by 20 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AMLP or AVGO?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for AMLP and +48.9% for AVGO. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMLP or AVGO?
AMLP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AMLP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 31 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMLP or AVGO?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMLP or AVGO?
AMLP on the Momentum factor, by 20 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMLP or AVGO?
AMLP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AMLP on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMLP more profitable than AVGO?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is AMLP's lead over AVGO getting stronger or weaker?
AMLP lead: Reversed — AVGO led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AMLP now leads by 7. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-12, when AMLP moved ahead of AVGO.
What would change the AMLP vs AVGO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AVGO closes the Value gap — currently 31 points behind, the largest single contributor to AMLP's edge; AVGO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; AMLP's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AMLP and AVGO?
AMLP: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. AVGO: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on AMLP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On AVGO it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.