AMZY vs BTCI: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk

AMZY and BTCI are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. AMZY is YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF, while BTCI is NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF. AMZY is broader by holdings count, with 15 positions versus 8 for BTCI. BTCI has the lower expense ratio. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has BTCI ahead on AIQ Score, 53 versus 50.

Market data as of Oct 21, 2026 market close· Fund characteristics as of Oct 21, 2026
AMZY
YieldMax
vs
BTCI
Neos
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
Issuer
YieldMax
Inception
2023-07-24
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
Issuer
Neos
Inception
2024-10-16

What is the main difference between AMZY and BTCI?

AMZY and BTCI have little in common: 0% of their weight is in the same securities.

Expense ratio
AMZY
1.09%
BTCI
0.99%
Lower annual fund costBTCI
Holdings
AMZY
15
BTCI
8
Broader reported basketAMZY
1Y return
AMZY
-24%
BTCI
-41%
Trailing performanceAMZY
Annualized volatility
AMZY
28.1%
BTCI
40.7%
Lower realized volatilityAMZY
MetricAMZYBTCI
Fund
Expense ratio1.09%0.99%
Holdings158
Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months47.65%30.36%
Average volume283,910580,902
Performance
1Y return-24%-41%
YTD return-21%-24.1%
Risk
Annualized volatility28.1%40.7%
Max drawdown (1Y)-34.8%-53.9%
Beta1.161.55
Sharpe ratio-0.96-1.15
Sortino ratio-1.56-1.66
AlgovestIQ
AIQ Score50/10053/100
AIQ Edge Score4/105/10
Momentum48/10051/100
Risk Resilience68/10061/100

AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison

YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF vs NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

Data as of Oct 21, 2026· market close· Options Income / Covered Call· Coverage 58/66 fields· Moderate confidence
AIQ VerdictFragileAIQ Comparison Conviction 2/10

BTCI leads

BTCI leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 8 points over 30 sessions.

Fragile: 1 of 3 evidence groups support BTCI, and its lead is narrowing.

Evidence agreement: 1 of 3Comparison trend: Weakening
AMZY

YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF

AIQ Score
50/100
AIQ Edge Score
4/10
BTCI

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

Leads
AIQ Score
53/100
AIQ Edge Score
5/10

The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BTCI over AMZY, 53 versus 50 as of Oct 21, 2026. BTCI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while AMZY holds the stronger risk resilience profile. BTCI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 3 covered evidence groups favor BTCI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. BTCI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 3 points over 30 sessions.

Compare YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.

AMZY vs BTCI: which fits what

Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.

If you wantAMZYBTCIFits
Lower costExpense ratio1.09%0.99%BTCI
Broader diversificationNumber of holdings158AMZY
Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield47.65%30.36%AMZY
Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 1 year-34.8%-53.9%AMZY
Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year28.1%40.7%AMZY

Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.

Currently unavailable

Performance over time

Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.

AMZY
+33.7%
BTCI
+17.5%

Total return comparison

Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested

AMZY $13,372 · BTCI $11,751

Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.

Compare AMZY and BTCI against another ticker

Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.

Basic: 2 symbols·Explorer: 3 symbols·Pro and Premium: 5 symbols·Your limit: 2

AIQ Factor Divergence

Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.

AMZY advantage
0
BTCI advantage
  • Quality42 vs 50
    BTCI +8
  • Risk Resilience68 vs 61
    AMZY +7
  • Momentum48 vs 51
    Even

1 of 3 evidence groups favor BTCI. BTCI’s edge is concentrated in quality; AMZY keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.

What changed since the last close

Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.

AMZY0 AIQ

Largest factor move: Quality +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.

No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.

BTCI+2 AIQ

Largest factor move: Momentum +3

No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.

BTCI's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.

Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMZY and BTCI both carry a full feed there.

The central trade-off

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.

AMZY (YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF): the counter-case, on risk resilience — but at materially higher volatility, 22.3% against 16.5%.

Fund facts, side by side

Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.

MeasureAMZYBTCIWhy it matters
Expense ratio1.09%0.99%Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold.
Holdings158More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns.
Average volume283,910580,902Liquidity — matters most if you trade size.
Annualized volatility28.1%40.7%Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure.
Max drawdown (1Y)-34.8%-53.9%The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year.
Sharpe ratio-0.96-1.15Return per unit of risk. Higher is better.
Beta1.161.55Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio.

How much of the same holdings they own

AMZY and BTCI share 0% of their weighted exposure across 0 common holdings.

6 holdings are unique to AMZY, and 7 holdings are unique to BTCI. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.

What AMZY adds that BTCI doesn’t

HoldingAMZYBTCI
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/202724.9%Not held
United States Treasury Bill 07/08/202720.64%Not held
United States Treasury Bill 02/18/202717.14%Not held
United States Treasury Bill 12/10/202611.59%Not held
United States Treasury Bill 10/15/20269.85%Not held
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20312.67%Not held

What BTCI adds that AMZY doesn’t

HoldingBTCIAMZY
912797VP9United States Treasury Bill 11/03/202659.55%Not held
CBTX 261016C01390000CBTX US 10/16/26 C139019.46%Not held
IBITiShares Bitcoin Trust ETF16.59%Not held
HODLVanEck Bitcoin ETF/US1.98%Not held
CBTX 261016C01980000CBTX US 10/16/26 C19800.39%Not held
CBTX 261016P01390000CBTX US 10/16/26 P13900.29%Not held

Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.

AMZY vs BTCI: five-year payout growth

AMZY began paying distributions in 2023, so it has no 2020-2025 growth rate to compare. BTCI began paying distributions in 2024, so it has no 2020-2025 growth rate to compare.

Dividend metricAMZYBTCI
2025 annual payout$6.984$16.052
Peer ranknot rankednot ranked

Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.

AIQ Agreement Matrix

1 of 3 covered evidence groups favor BTCI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.

Evidence groupFavorsReading
AIQ ScoreEven50 vs 53
FundamentalsNot coveredNot covered
ValuationNot coveredNot covered
TechnicalsBTCIPrice vs 50-day -0.7% vs 3.4%; vs 200-day -8.1% vs -1%
Risk ResilienceAMZYRisk Resilience 68 vs 61
Analyst expectationsNot coveredNot covered

✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMZY and BTCI and are excluded from the count.

AIQ Decision Stability

Fragile

The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.

  • The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • Only 1 of 3 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)

Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BTCI.

How the comparison changed

45 daily snapshots · Sep 6 – Oct 20

BTCI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 8 to 3 points over 30 sessions.

Sep 6AMZY leads above the line · BTCI leads belowOct 20
Today
BTCI +3
50 vs 53
7 sessions ago
BTCI +1
48 vs 49
30 sessions ago
BTCI +8
45 vs 53
90 sessions ago
Not covered

The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 15 when BTCI moved ahead of AMZY.

AIQ Signal Divergence

Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.

AMZYConflicted

1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted

Only AMZY

  • Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
  • MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
BTCI

0 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral

Only BTCI

  • Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
  • MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon

Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Death Cross Active.

AMZY is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.

Price vs model alignment

Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.

AMZYNo material change

Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price 0%, AIQ 0 points).

BTCIConfirmed strength

Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.12%, AIQ +2 points).

What would flip this result

A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.

  1. 1AMZY closes the Quality gap — currently 8 points behind, the largest single contributor to BTCI's edge.
  2. 2AMZY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
  3. 3BTCI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
  4. 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate BTCI's advantage entirely.

The full evidence

Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.

Performance

AMZY leads 4 of 6 windows
MetricAMZYBTCI
1 week (5 sessions)0.3%-0.6%
1 month (20 sessions)0%-3%
3 months (63 sessions)-2.4%15.5%
6 months (126 sessions)-15.1%-7.1%
Year to date-21%-24.1%
1 year (252 sessions)-24%-41%

Technicals

BTCI has the stronger structure
MetricAMZYBTCI
RSI (14)5745.9
ADX (14)1218.2
Price vs 50-day-0.7%3.4%
Price vs 200-day-8.1%-1%
Volatility (1M, annualized)22.3%16.5%

Risk

AMZY is the more resilient
MetricAMZYBTCI
Beta1.161.55
Sharpe ratio-0.96-1.15
Sortino ratio-1.56-1.66
Max drawdown-34.8%-53.9%
Current drawdown-31.5%-42.8%
Annualized volatility28.1%40.7%
Value at risk (95%)-2.7%-4.3%

Straight answers

Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.

What is the difference between AMZY and BTCI?

AMZY and BTCI have little in common: 0% of their weight is in the same securities.

How much do AMZY and BTCI overlap?

AMZY and BTCI share 0% of their weighted exposure across 0 common holdings. 6 holdings are unique to AMZY, and 7 holdings are unique to BTCI. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.

Which ETF is more diversified, AMZY or BTCI?

AMZY holds more positions: 15 versus 8 for BTCI.

Which has the lower expense ratio?

BTCI has the lower expense ratio, 0.99% a year against 1.09% for AMZY.

Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?

AMZY, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 47.65% against 30.36% for BTCI.

Which ETF has been more volatile?

BTCI has been more volatile over the past year, at 40.7% annualized against 28.1% for AMZY.

Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?

AMZY fell less from peak to trough over the past year: -34.8% against -53.9% for BTCI.

Compare AMZY and BTCI with others

Continue your research

This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.

How this comparison is scored

The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.

The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.

How to use side-by-side comparison →

This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.