APD vs AVGO Stock Comparison
APD currently leads AVGO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 51 vs 49. The clearest difference is momentum, while AVGO has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between APD and AVGO?
APD leads the current stock comparison as Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. vs Broadcom Inc.
APD leads
APD leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from AVGO. Wall Street currently favors AVGO on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support APD, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Broadcom Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors APD over AVGO, 51 versus 49 as of Oct 22, 2026. APD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while AVGO holds the stronger quality profile. APD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AVGO. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor APD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. APD lead: Reversed — AVGO led by 19 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; APD now leads by 2.
Compare Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and Broadcom Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare APD and AVGO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum89 vs 27APD +62
- Quality25 vs 85AVGO +60
- Value40 vs 30APD +10
- Risk Resilience61 vs 53APD +8
3 of 6 evidence groups favor APD. APD’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; AVGO keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
APD's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — APD and AVGO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
APD (Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 36.5% against 16.5%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
APDAPD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AVGOAVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
APDAPD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
APDAPD on the Momentum factor, by 62 points.
Lower downside
APDAPD on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
AVGOAVGO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors APD, analyst targets favor AVGO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | APD | AVGO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +11.8% | +48.9% | AVGO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +20.1% | +49.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 18 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | APD | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 5.90% | 12.63% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $5.360 | $1.335 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $7.140 | $2.420 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #55 |
AVGO grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 12.63% a year against APD's 5.90%. AVGO never reduced its regular dividend in the window; APD did in 1 year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor APD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 51 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | AVGO | EPS growth -3% vs 26.5%; gross margin 32.1% vs 67%; operating margin -4.7% vs 43.7% |
| Valuation | APD | Value 40 vs 30 |
| Technicals | APD | Price vs 50-day 3.1% vs -6.7%; vs 200-day 5% vs -9.1% |
| Risk Resilience | APD | Risk Resilience 61 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | AVGO | Target upside 11.8% vs 48.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of APD and AVGO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on APD.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20APD lead: Reversed — AVGO led by 19 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; APD now leads by 2.
- Today
- APD +2
- 51 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- AVGO +2
- 50 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- AVGO +19
- 34 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- AVGO +12
- 45 vs 57
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Oct 19 when APD moved ahead of AVGO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only APD
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.87%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish
Only AVGO
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.65%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
APD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.03%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.03%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AVGO closes the Momentum gap — currently 62 points behind, the largest single contributor to APD's edge.
- 2AVGO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3APD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AVGO leads on balance| Metric | APD | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.3% | 14.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -3% | 26.5% |
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 67% |
| Operating margin | -4.7% | 43.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -0.3% | 36.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.31 | 0.74 |
Performance
APD leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | APD | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.7% | -6.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 5.1% | -8.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 1.9% | -15.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.6% | -16.4% |
| Year to date | 22.5% | -3.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 17.5% | -5.6% |
Technicals
APD has the stronger structure| Metric | APD | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 79.1 | 41.8 |
| ADX (14) | 22.7 | 21.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.1% | -6.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5% | -9.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 16.5% | 36.5% |
Risk
APD is the more resilient| Metric | APD | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.09 | 2.16 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.66 | 0.05 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.04 | 0.07 |
| Max drawdown | -13% | -31.7% |
| Current drawdown | -3.7% | -30.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.3% | 45.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.9% | -4.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, APD or AVGO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, APD is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 51 against AVGO's 49. The edge comes from momentum and value. AVGO is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is APD or AVGO the better buy right now?
APD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor APD over AVGO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. APD leads Momentum by 62 points; AVGO leads Quality by 60 points; APD leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, APD or AVGO?
Analyst price targets imply +11.8% upside for APD and +48.9% for AVGO, so the Street currently favors AVGO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors APD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, APD or AVGO?
APD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. APD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, APD or AVGO?
AVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, APD or AVGO?
APD on the Momentum factor, by 62 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, APD or AVGO?
APD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. APD on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is APD more profitable than AVGO?
AVGO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 32.1% vs 67%; operating margin -4.7% vs 43.7%; ttm roe -0.3% vs 36.4%.
Is APD's lead over AVGO getting stronger or weaker?
APD lead: Reversed — AVGO led by 19 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; APD now leads by 2. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-19, when APD moved ahead of AVGO.
What would change the APD vs AVGO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AVGO closes the Momentum gap — currently 62 points behind, the largest single contributor to APD's edge; AVGO's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; APD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about APD and AVGO?
APD: 5 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. AVGO: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on APD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On AVGO it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare APD and AVGO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.