APP vs AVGO Stock Comparison
Compare APP and AVGO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between APP and AVGO?
APP leads the current stock comparison as AppLovin Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
AppLovin Corporation vs Broadcom Inc.
APP leads
APP leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support APP, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
AppLovin Corporation
Broadcom Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors APP over AVGO, 60 versus 52 as of Sep 11, 2026. APP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while AVGO holds the stronger risk resilience profile. APP also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor APP today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. APP lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare AppLovin Corporation and Broadcom Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare APP and AVGO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum61 vs 39APP +22
- Value47 vs 30APP +17
- Risk Resilience36 vs 52AVGO +16
- Quality83 vs 85Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor APP. APP’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; AVGO keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
APP's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — APP and AVGO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
APP (AppLovin Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
APPAPP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AVGOAVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
APPAPP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
APPAPP on the Momentum factor, by 22 points.
Lower downside
AVGOAVGO on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
APPAPP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | APP | AVGO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +74.2% | +39.4% | APP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +83.8% | +49.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 15 | 17 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor APP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | APP | 60 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | APPon balance | revenue growth 4.4% vs 14.9%; EPS growth 5.6% vs 26.5%; TTM ROE 193.1% vs 36.4%; gross margin 88.5% vs 67%; operating margin 77.4% vs 43.7% — APP takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | APP | Value 47 vs 30 |
| Technicals | AVGO | Price vs 50-day -15.3% vs -5.5%; vs 200-day -34.9% vs -2.5% |
| Risk Resilience | AVGO | Risk Resilience 36 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | APP | Target upside 74.2% vs 39.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of APP and AVGO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on APP.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10APP lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- APP +8
- 60 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- APP +13
- 60 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- APP +3
- 48 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- APP +12
- 62 vs 50
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Aug 19 when APP moved ahead of AVGO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (26.26%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.9%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.55%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
APP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +3.01%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.32%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AVGO closes the Momentum gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to APP's edge.
- 2AVGO's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3APP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
APP leads on balance| Metric | APP | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.4% | 14.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 5.6% | 26.5% |
| Gross margin | 88.5% | 67% |
| Operating margin | 77.4% | 43.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 193.1% | 36.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.11 | 0.74 |
Performance
AVGO leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | APP | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.4% | -1.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.5% | -13.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -36.2% | -3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -31.8% | 5.6% |
| Year to date | -53.3% | 4.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -39.9% | 6.9% |
Technicals
AVGO has the stronger structure| Metric | APP | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 53.4 | 47.7 |
| ADX (14) | 26 | 23.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -15.3% | -5.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -34.9% | -2.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 39.6% | 37.6% |
Risk
AVGO is the more resilient| Metric | APP | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.09 | 2.16 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.46 | 0.3 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.57 | 0.44 |
| Max drawdown | -59.3% | -28.9% |
| Current drawdown | -57.1% | -25.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 73.2% | 47.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -7.6% | -4.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, APP or AVGO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, APP is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 60 against AVGO's 52. The edge comes from momentum and value. AVGO is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is APP or AVGO the better buy right now?
APP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor APP over AVGO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. APP leads Momentum by 22 points; APP leads Value by 17 points; AVGO leads Risk Resilience by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, APP or AVGO?
Analyst price targets imply +74.2% upside for APP and +39.4% for AVGO, so the Street currently favors APP. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, APP or AVGO?
APP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. APP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, APP or AVGO?
AVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, APP or AVGO?
APP on the Momentum factor, by 22 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, APP or AVGO?
AVGO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AVGO on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is APP more profitable than AVGO?
APP leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 88.5% vs 67%; operating margin 77.4% vs 43.7%; ttm roe 193.1% vs 36.4%.
Is APP's lead over AVGO getting stronger or weaker?
APP lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-19, when APP moved ahead of AVGO.
What would change the APP vs AVGO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AVGO closes the Momentum gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to APP's edge; AVGO's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; APP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about APP and AVGO?
APP: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. AVGO: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on APP is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On AVGO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare APP and AVGO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.