ARKK vs ARKQ ETF Comparison
Compare ARKK and ARKQ across fund costs, diversification, holdings, performance, income, risk and current AlgovestIQ evidence.
What is the main difference between ARKK and ARKQ?
ARKK is ARK Innovation ETF, while ARKQ is ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF. ARKK is tied to Equity; ARKQ is tied to Equity. ARKK is broader by holdings count, with 43 positions versus 38 for ARKQ. ARKQ is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight.
| Metric | ARKK | ARKQ | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% | Fund |
| Assets under management | $5.6B | $1.9B | Fund |
| Holdings | 43 | 38 | Fund |
| Top-10 concentration | 65.8% | 76.8% | Fund |
| Average volume | 8,768,519 | 93,653 | Fund |
| Underlying exposure | Equity | Equity | Fund |
| Annualized volatility | 37.9% | 35.1% | Risk |
| Max drawdown | -31.4% | -23.8% | Risk |
| Beta | 2.28 | 2.20 | Risk |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.49 | 0.76 | Risk |
| Sortino ratio | 0.84 | 1.23 | Risk |
| AIQ Score | 47/100 | 38/100 | AlgovestIQ |
| AIQ Edge Score | 3/10 | 1/10 | AlgovestIQ |
| Momentum | 71/100 | 39/100 | AlgovestIQ |
| Risk Resilience | 20/100 | 42/100 | AlgovestIQ |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
ARK Innovation ETF vs ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
ARKK leads
ARKK leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 4 evidence groups support ARKK, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
ARK Innovation ETF
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ARKK over ARKQ, 47 versus 38 as of Sep 5, 2026. ARKK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while ARKQ holds the stronger risk resilience profile. ARKK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor ARKK today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. ARKK lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare ARK Innovation ETF and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
Compare ARKK and ARKQ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25%71 vs 39ARKK +32
- Risk Resilience15%20 vs 42ARKQ +22
- Quality30%64 vs 46ARKK +18
- Value30%25 vs 27Even
2 of 4 evidence groups favor ARKK. ARKK’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; ARKQ keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +16
No new signals fired.
ARKK's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ARKK and ARKQ both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ARKKARKK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
ARKKARKK on the Momentum factor, by 32 points.
Lower downside
ARKQARKQ on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | ARKK | ARKQ | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Assets under management | $5.6B | $1.9B | Larger funds generally carry tighter spreads. |
| Holdings | 10 | 40 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 8,768,519 | 93,653 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 37.9% | 35.1% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown | -31.4% | -23.8% | The worst peak-to-trough loss on record for the fund. |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.49 | 0.76 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 2.28 | 2.20 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
ARKK and ARKQ share 44.52% of their weighted exposure across 16 common holdings.
ARKQ is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 76.85% of the fund, against 65.84% for ARKK (38 holdings vs 43). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
27 holdings are unique to ARKK and 22 to ARKQ. Owning both is a partial overlap: a majority of the capital is distinct, but the largest positions are shared.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | ARKK | ARKQ | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLATESLA INC | 9.62% | 11.04% | 9.62% |
| SPCXSPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A | 6.28% | 8.2% | 6.28% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 4.89% | 7.11% | 4.89% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.88% | 7.38% | 4.88% |
| PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 2.88% | 4.71% | 2.88% |
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 2.54% | 5.1% | 2.54% |
| RKLBROCKET LAB | 1.97% | 7.27% | 1.97% |
| TSMTAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR-SP ADR | 1.9% | 6.98% | 1.9% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
ETF comparison questions
Short answers to the fund-specific questions behind this comparison.
Which ETF is more diversified, ARKK or ARKQ?
ARKK currently has more reported holdings, with 43 positions versus 38.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
The current fund profile does not show a lower-cost winner.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
The current dataset does not show a higher-yield winner.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
ARKK has the higher annualized volatility in the current risk snapshot.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
ARKQ has the less severe max drawdown in the current risk snapshot.
Which ETF has the stronger current AlgovestIQ evidence?
ARKK currently leads on supporting AlgovestIQ evidence, 47 to 38.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor ARKK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ARKK | 47 vs 38 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Even | Value 25 vs 27 |
| Technicals | ARKK | Price vs 50-day 8.4% vs -0.5%; vs 200-day 13.3% vs -0.4% |
| Risk Resilience | ARKQ | Risk Resilience 20 vs 42 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ARKK and ARKQ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- Only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ARKK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3ARKK lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ARKK +9
- 47 vs 38
- 7 sessions ago
- ARKK +13
- 47 vs 34
- 30 sessions ago
- ARKK +3
- 50 vs 47
- 90 sessions ago
- ARKK +6
- 48 vs 42
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 7 when ARKK moved ahead of ARKQ.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.50%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.45%)
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
ARKK leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.06%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.46%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ARKQ closes the Momentum gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to ARKK's edge.
- 2ARKQ's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3ARKK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Technicals
ARKK has the stronger structure| Metric | ARKK | ARKQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 60.9 | 33.3 |
| ADX (14) | 24.8 | 19 |
| Price vs 50-day | 8.4% | -0.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 13.3% | -0.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41.8% | 26.2% |
Risk
ARKQ is the more resilient| Metric | ARKK | ARKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.28 | 2.2 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.49 | 0.76 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.84 | 1.23 |
| Max drawdown | -31.4% | -23.8% |
| Current drawdown | -5.8% | -14.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.9% | 35.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ARKK or ARKQ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ARKK is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 47 against ARKQ's 38. The edge comes from momentum and quality. ARKQ is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ARKK or ARKQ the better buy right now?
ARKK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ARKK over ARKQ?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. ARKK leads Momentum by 32 points; ARKQ leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; ARKK leads Quality by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which is better value, ARKK or ARKQ?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ARKK or ARKQ?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ARKK or ARKQ?
ARKK on the Momentum factor, by 32 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ARKK or ARKQ?
ARKQ is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ARKQ on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ARKK more profitable than ARKQ?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is ARKK's lead over ARKQ getting stronger or weaker?
ARKK lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-07, when ARKK moved ahead of ARKQ.
What would change the ARKK vs ARKQ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ARKQ closes the Momentum gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to ARKK's edge; ARKQ's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; ARKK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ARKK and ARKQ?
ARKK: 4 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. ARKQ: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ARKK is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ARKQ it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare ARKK and ARKQ with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.