ASX vs QQQ Stock Comparison
Compare ASX and QQQ across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ASX and QQQ?
QQQ leads the current stock comparison as Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
QQQ leads
QQQ leads by 16 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Competitive: 2 of 4 evidence groups support QQQ.
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors QQQ over ASX, 59 versus 43 as of Sep 6, 2026. QQQ's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while ASX holds the stronger value profile. QQQ also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor QQQ today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree.
Compare ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ASX and QQQ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%45 vs 83QQQ +38
- Risk Resilience15%39 vs 75QQQ +36
- Value30%47 vs 30ASX +17
- Momentum25%40 vs 54QQQ +14
2 of 4 evidence groups favor QQQ. QQQ’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; ASX keeps a meaningful value edge.
The central trade-off
QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
ASX (ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 43.3% against 12.9%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
QQQQQQ on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
ASXASX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
QQQQQQ on the Momentum factor, by 14 points.
Lower downside
QQQQQQ on Risk Resilience, by 36 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor QQQ. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | QQQ | 43 vs 59 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | ASX | Value 47 vs 30 |
| Technicals | ASX | Price vs 50-day -2.6% vs 1.1%; vs 200-day 33.5% vs 9.3% |
| Risk Resilience | QQQ | Risk Resilience 39 vs 75 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ASX and QQQ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 16 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on QQQ.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ASX closes the Quality gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to QQQ's edge.
- 2ASX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3QQQ starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | ASX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.9% | — |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 50% | — |
| Gross margin | 19.5% | — |
| Operating margin | 9.8% | — |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.3% | — |
| Debt to equity | 0.76 | — |
Performance
ASX leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | ASX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.7% | 0.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.3% | -0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10.2% | 2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 77.6% | 19.9% |
| Year to date | 133% | 17% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 263.1% | 26.1% |
Technicals
ASX has the stronger structure| Metric | ASX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39.3 | 42.1 |
| ADX (14) | 8.8 | 10.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2.6% | 1.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 33.5% | 9.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 43.3% | 12.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ASX or QQQ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, QQQ is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 59 against ASX's 43. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. ASX is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ASX or QQQ the better buy right now?
QQQ carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor QQQ over ASX?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. QQQ leads Quality by 38 points; QQQ leads Risk Resilience by 36 points; ASX leads Value by 17 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which is better value, ASX or QQQ?
ASX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ASX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ASX or QQQ?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ASX or QQQ?
QQQ on the Momentum factor, by 14 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ASX or QQQ?
QQQ is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. QQQ on Risk Resilience, by 36 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ASX more profitable than QQQ?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
What would change the ASX vs QQQ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ASX closes the Quality gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to QQQ's edge; ASX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; QQQ starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.