AVGO vs AMAT Stock Comparison
AVGO currently leads AMAT in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 49 vs 45. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between AVGO and AMAT?
AVGO leads the current stock comparison as Broadcom Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Broadcom Inc. vs Applied Materials, Inc.
AVGO leads
AVGO leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from AMAT.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support AVGO, and the lead recently changed hands.
Broadcom Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AVGO over AMAT, 49 versus 45 as of Oct 21, 2026. AVGO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. AVGO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AVGO today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. AVGO lead: Reversed — AMAT led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AVGO now leads by 4.
Compare Broadcom Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AVGO and AMAT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum27 vs 8AVGO +19
- Risk Resilience53 vs 45AVGO +8
- Quality85 vs 88Even
- Value30 vs 32Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor AVGO. AVGO’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
AVGO's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AVGO and AMAT both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AVGOAVGO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AVGOAVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
AVGOAVGO on the Momentum factor, by 19 points.
Lower downside
AVGOAVGO on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AVGO | AMAT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +48.9% | +49.5% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +49.7% | +68.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 18 | 24 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | AVGO | AMAT |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 12.63% | 15.39% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.335 | $0.870 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.420 | $1.780 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #55 | #32 |
AMAT grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 15.39% a year against AVGO's 12.63%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AVGO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AVGO | 49 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | AVGOon balance | revenue growth 14.9% vs 15.2%; EPS growth 26.5% vs -9.3%; TTM ROE 36.4% vs 40.4%; gross margin 67% vs 49.4%; operating margin 43.7% vs 30.5% — AVGO takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 30 vs 32 |
| Technicals | AVGO | Price vs 50-day -6.7% vs -14.3%; vs 200-day -9.1% vs -6.7% |
| Risk Resilience | AVGO | Risk Resilience 53 vs 45 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 48.9% vs 49.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AVGO and AMAT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AVGO.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20AVGO lead: Reversed — AMAT led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AVGO now leads by 4.
- Today
- AVGO +4
- 49 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- AVGO +6
- 52 vs 46
- 30 sessions ago
- AMAT +13
- 53 vs 66
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 57 vs 57
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 13 when AVGO moved ahead of AMAT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish
Only AVGO
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.65%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only AMAT
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (8.37%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.00%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bearish Crossover.
AMAT is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.03%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.98%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AMAT closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to AVGO's edge.
- 2AMAT's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3AVGO starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AVGO leads on balance| Metric | AVGO | AMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.9% | 15.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 26.5% | -9.3% |
| Gross margin | 67% | 49.4% |
| Operating margin | 43.7% | 30.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 36.4% | 40.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.74 | 0.29 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | AVGO | AMAT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -6.4% | -12.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -8.3% | -14.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -15.7% | -26.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -16.4% | 5.1% |
| Year to date | -3.4% | 57.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -5.6% | 79.9% |
Technicals
AVGO has the stronger structure| Metric | AVGO | AMAT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.8 | 19.7 |
| ADX (14) | 21.4 | 24.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.7% | -14.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.1% | -6.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 36.5% | 45.5% |
Risk
AVGO is the more resilient| Metric | AVGO | AMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.16 | 2.69 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.05 | 1.22 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.07 | 1.95 |
| Max drawdown | -31.7% | -44% |
| Current drawdown | -30.6% | -44% |
| Annualized volatility | 45.9% | 60% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.4% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AVGO or AMAT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AVGO is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 49 against AMAT's 45. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AVGO or AMAT the better buy right now?
AVGO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AVGO over AMAT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AVGO leads Momentum by 19 points; AVGO leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AVGO or AMAT?
Analyst price targets imply +48.9% upside for AVGO and +49.5% for AMAT. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AVGO or AMAT?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AVGO or AMAT?
AVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AVGO or AMAT?
AVGO on the Momentum factor, by 19 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AVGO or AMAT?
AVGO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AVGO on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AVGO more profitable than AMAT?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 67% vs 49.4%; operating margin 43.7% vs 30.5%; ttm roe 36.4% vs 40.4%. AVGO leads on two measures and AMAT on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is AVGO's lead over AMAT getting stronger or weaker?
AVGO lead: Reversed — AMAT led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AVGO now leads by 4. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-13, when AVGO moved ahead of AMAT.
What would change the AVGO vs AMAT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AMAT closes the Momentum gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to AVGO's edge; AMAT's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; AVGO starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AVGO and AMAT?
AVGO: 0 bullish / 3 bearish. AMAT: 2 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AVGO is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On AMAT it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AVGO and AMAT with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.