Score MethodologyIntermediate6 min readJune 2026

By AlgovestIQ Research

How the AIQ Score Is Built and How to Use It

The AIQ Score is a five-factor composite investment signal that synthesizes Momentum, Value, Quality, Risk, and Sentiment into a daily-updating 0-100 number. This page explains exactly how each factor contributes, why the score history matters more than any single reading, and how to interpret divergences between the AIQ Score and Smart Score.

How the AIQ Score Is Built

The AIQ Score is a composite investment signal built from five factor dimensions that academic research has consistently associated with differentiated long-term equity returns: Momentum, Value, Quality, Risk, and Sentiment. Unlike a single analyst price target or a one-dimensional screening rule, the AIQ Score synthesizes observable data across these five orthogonal lenses simultaneously, weighting them in a way that reflects both the statistical evidence for each factor's persistence and the practical realities of how each factor behaves across market regimes. The result is a daily-updating, 0-100 signal that represents the preponderance of the observable systematic evidence for a stock at the current moment.

Key Concept
The five factors — Momentum, Value, Quality, Risk, and Sentiment — are orthogonal: they measure different things and can point in different directions at the same time. A stock can have high Quality and low Momentum simultaneously. The composite score reflects all five readings at once, not just the loudest signal.

Quality vs. Momentum: Two Different Time Horizons

The Quality sub-score is the highest-information single dimension for longer-horizon investors. Quality captures earnings durability, return on invested capital, balance sheet integrity, and free-cash-flow conversion — the dimensions that distinguish a business with durable competitive advantages from one with temporarily elevated earnings. Sustained high Quality scores are the most predictive of long-term compounding; a Quality score collapse before a price decline is one of the strongest leading indicators the model tracks.

The Momentum sub-score, by contrast, is highest-information for shorter-horizon, trend-following applications: it captures whether institutional money flow and price behavior are constructive right now, regardless of the fundamental quality of the underlying business.

Key Concept
A stock can have high Quality (durable business) and low Momentum (bad timing) simultaneously. This is not a contradiction — it is the classic entry setup for patient investors waiting for technical confirmation before adding to a fundamentally strong name.

The Smart Score (1-10) and Why Both Scores Are Shown

The Smart Score (1-10) is a cross-validated composite that applies different factor weights than the AIQ 0-100 score, providing an independent read on the same underlying data. A Smart Score of 7 or above reflects broad-based constructive evidence across multiple factor dimensions; a score below 4 reflects systematic weakness.

The reason both scores are displayed — rather than just one — is that they sometimes diverge, and divergences are informative: a high AIQ but low Smart Score typically indicates one dimension (often Momentum) is driving the composite while the cross-validated view is more skeptical. That kind of divergence warrants closer inspection before acting.

Why Score History Matters More Than the Current Reading

Score history is as important as the current reading. A stock that has maintained a Quality score above 75 across multiple consecutive months is exhibiting a fundamentally different profile from one that spiked to 75 for a single snapshot. Sustained elevation across multiple factor dimensions — particularly Quality and Risk — is the signature of the kind of business that tends to compound well through diverse market environments.

Conversely, a recent score collapse (a stock that was at 70 six months ago and is now at 40) deserves scrutiny: it may signal genuine fundamental deterioration, or it may signal a temporary momentum trough in an otherwise intact business. Context and the composition of the score change determines which interpretation is more likely.

Key Concept
Single-session score spikes are weak signals. Sustained elevation — a stock that has been above 70 for 8 consecutive weeks — is a strong signal. The score history chart exists specifically to help you distinguish these two cases.

How to Read Each Sub-Score

ScoreWhat It Measures
AIQ Score (0-100)Above 70 is broadly constructive. Below 40 indicates systematic weakness across multiple factor dimensions. The number alone is less important than the trend and the composition.
Smart Score (1-10)7-10 is strong buy territory; 4-6 is hold; below 4 is caution. Confirm against the AIQ Score — consistent signals are more reliable than isolated readings.
Momentum sub-scoreReflects recent price behavior relative to market and sector. High momentum indicates current institutional buying pressure; low momentum indicates current selling or disinterest.
Quality sub-scoreThe most forward-looking single sub-score. Earnings durability, ROIC, FCF quality. Persistent high Quality is the strongest predictor of durable long-term outperformance.
Risk sub-score (lower = safer)Captures volatility, drawdown behavior, and beta context. Higher Risk scores indicate elevated uncertainty in current price behavior — size positions accordingly.
Value sub-scoreReflects current valuation attractiveness relative to fundamental context. A high-Value, high-Quality combination is the classic quality-at-a-reasonable-price setup that most systematic investors are designed to find.
Score historyWatch for sustained elevation vs. spike-and-drop patterns. Stocks that consistently appear above 70 across multiple sessions are more reliable setups than single-day breakouts.
AIQ scores update daily based on observable market and fundamental data. Scores are systematic signals, not investment recommendations. Past score levels do not guarantee future price performance.

See It Live on Stock Pages

Every stock page on AlgovestIQ shows the current AIQ Score, Smart Score, and factor sub-scores alongside score history, signal drivers, and regime context. The methodology above applies to every ticker in the system.

In AIQ
The AIQ Command Center shows ranked scores across your full watchlist — compare AIQ and Smart Scores side by side, filter by factor, and surface the highest-conviction setups in your portfolio.
Open AIQ Command Center

AIQ Score Methodology — Frequently Asked Questions

What is the AIQ Score?

The AIQ Score is a 0-100 composite investment signal that synthesizes five factor dimensions simultaneously: Momentum, Value, Quality, Risk, and Sentiment. Each factor is weighted based on its statistical evidence for persistence and how it behaves across market regimes. The result is a daily-updating signal representing the preponderance of observable systematic evidence for a stock. A score above 70 is broadly constructive; below 40 indicates systematic weakness across multiple dimensions.

How is the AIQ Score different from the Smart Score?

The AIQ Score (0-100) and Smart Score (1-10) are calculated from the same underlying data but use different factor weights, providing an independent read. The Smart Score applies cross-validation across factor dimensions; the AIQ Score weights factors by their statistical persistence. When they diverge — high AIQ but low Smart Score — it typically means one factor (often Momentum) is driving the composite while the cross-validated view is more skeptical. Divergences warrant closer inspection before acting.

What does a high Quality sub-score mean?

The Quality sub-score captures earnings durability, return on invested capital, balance sheet integrity, and free-cash-flow conversion. These dimensions distinguish a business with durable competitive advantages from one with temporarily elevated earnings. Sustained high Quality scores — particularly above 75 across multiple consecutive months — are the most predictive factor for long-term compounding. A Quality score collapse before a price decline is one of the model's strongest leading indicators.

How often does the AIQ Score update?

AIQ scores update daily based on observable market and fundamental data. Score history is tracked with weekly snapshots so you can evaluate whether a high score reflects sustained elevation or a single-session spike.

Is a high AIQ Score a buy signal?

No — AIQ scores are systematic signals, not investment recommendations. A high score means the observable evidence across five factor dimensions is broadly constructive. It does not guarantee future price performance, and past score levels do not predict returns. You should validate any signal against your own risk tolerance, investment horizon, and position sizing rules.

What does the Momentum sub-score measure?

The Momentum sub-score captures whether institutional money flow and price behavior are constructive right now, regardless of the fundamental quality of the underlying business. It is highest-information for shorter-horizon, trend-following applications. High momentum indicates current institutional buying pressure; low momentum indicates selling or disinterest. Momentum is the most regime-sensitive factor: it tends to be more predictive in trending markets and less reliable during reversals.

How do I read the score history?

Score history matters more than the current reading. A stock that maintained Quality above 75 across multiple consecutive months has a fundamentally different profile from one that spiked to 75 once. Sustained elevation across Quality and Risk is the signature of businesses that tend to compound through diverse market environments. A recent collapse (a stock at 70 six months ago, now at 40) deserves scrutiny: it may signal genuine fundamental deterioration, or a temporary momentum trough in an otherwise intact business.

Continue learning

Explore factor investing concepts and how each dimension is measured

© 2026 AlgoVestIQTermsPrivacyRisk Disclosure

Informational only, not investment advice. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.