BAC vs FOX Stock Comparison
FOX currently leads BAC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 47. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between BAC and FOX?
FOX leads the current stock comparison as Fox Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Bank of America Corporation vs Fox Corporation
FOX leads
FOX leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support FOX, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Bank of America Corporation
Fox Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FOX over BAC, 57 versus 47 as of Oct 31, 2026. FOX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality. FOX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FOX today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Bank of America Corporation and Fox Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BAC and FOX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum26 vs 47FOX +21
- Quality49 vs 57FOX +8
- Value57 vs 63FOX +6
- Risk Resilience60 vs 61Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor FOX. FOX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
FOX's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BAC and FOX both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FOXFOX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
FOXFOX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
FOXFOX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
FOXFOX on the Momentum factor, by 21 points.
Lower downside
BACBAC carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
FOXFOX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BAC | FOX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +32.5% | +53.9% | FOX has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.6% | +27.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 5 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | BAC | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 8.45% | 3.64% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.720 | $0.460 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.080 | $0.550 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #133 | #293 |
BAC grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 8.45% a year against FOX's 3.64%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor FOX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FOX | 47 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | FOXon balance | revenue growth -3.3% vs 5.5%; EPS growth -23.8% vs 3.2%; TTM ROE 10.7% vs 14.7%; gross margin 60.4% vs 49.4%; operating margin 22.4% vs 24.5% — FOX takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | FOX | Value 57 vs 63 |
| Technicals | FOX | Price vs 50-day -12.1% vs -3.6%; vs 200-day -7.5% vs 0.6% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 60 vs 61 |
| Analyst expectations | FOX | Target upside 32.5% vs 53.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BAC and FOX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FOX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FOX +10
- 47 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- FOX +16
- 47 vs 63
- 30 sessions ago
- FOX +12
- 41 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- FOX +16
- 50 vs 66
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jul 8 when FOX moved ahead of BAC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
No signal that the other name lacks.
3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only FOX
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.21%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.83%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BAC closes the Momentum gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to FOX's edge.
- 2BAC's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3FOX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
FOX leads on balance| Metric | BAC | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.3% | 5.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -23.8% | 3.2% |
| Gross margin | 60.4% | 49.4% |
| Operating margin | 22.4% | 24.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.7% | 14.7% |
| Debt to equity | 1.28 | 0.65 |
Performance
FOX leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BAC | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.1% | -3.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -6.6% | 0.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -17.6% | 7.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -3.8% | -0.5% |
| Year to date | -7.5% | -13.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -3.3% | 6.5% |
Technicals
FOX has the stronger structure| Metric | BAC | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 31.2 | 47.7 |
| ADX (14) | 49.4 | 15.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -12.1% | -3.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -7.5% | 0.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20.8% | 30.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | BAC | FOX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.73 | -0.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.25 | 0.15 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.32 | 0.19 |
| Max drawdown | -22.3% | -34.5% |
| Current drawdown | -21.5% | -16.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 21.8% | 34.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.5% | -2.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BAC or FOX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FOX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 57 against BAC's 47. The edge comes from momentum and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BAC or FOX the better buy right now?
FOX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FOX over BAC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. FOX leads Momentum by 21 points; FOX leads Quality by 8 points; FOX leads Value by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BAC or FOX?
Analyst price targets imply +32.5% upside for BAC and +53.9% for FOX, so the Street currently favors FOX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BAC or FOX?
FOX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. FOX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BAC or FOX?
FOX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BAC or FOX?
FOX on the Momentum factor, by 21 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BAC or FOX?
BAC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BAC carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BAC more profitable than FOX?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 60.4% vs 49.4%; operating margin 22.4% vs 24.5%; ttm roe 10.7% vs 14.7%. BAC leads on one measure and FOX on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is FOX's lead over BAC getting stronger or weaker?
FOX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-07-08, when FOX moved ahead of BAC.
What would change the BAC vs FOX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BAC closes the Momentum gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to FOX's edge; BAC's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; FOX's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BAC and FOX?
BAC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. FOX: 3 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on BAC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On FOX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BAC and FOX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.