BGCP vs DUHP Stock Comparison
DUHP currently leads BGCP in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 45. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between BGCP and DUHP?
DUHP leads the current stock comparison as U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
BGC Partners, Inc. vs U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares
DUHP leads
DUHP leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience.
Stable: 2 of 3 evidence groups support DUHP, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
BGC Partners, Inc.
U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DUHP over BGCP, 56 versus 45 as of Nov 1, 2026. DUHP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience. 2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor DUHP today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. DUHP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 11 points over 30 sessions.
Compare BGC Partners, Inc. and U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BGCP and DUHP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience41 vs 83DUHP +42
- Value38 vs 35Even
- Quality55 vs 57Even
2 of 3 evidence groups favor DUHP. DUHP’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-30, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-29.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
New signals
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
DUHP's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BGCP and DUHP both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DUHPDUHP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DUHPDUHP on Risk Resilience, by 42 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor DUHP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DUHP | 45 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Even | Value 38 vs 35 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | DUHP | Risk Resilience 41 vs 83 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BGCP and DUHP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DUHP.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jul 1 – Oct 30DUHP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 11 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DUHP +11
- 45 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- DUHP +6
- 45 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- DUHP +11
- 46 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- DUHP +10
- 46 vs 56
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only DUHP
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.60%)
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (0.92%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.3%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.27%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BGCP closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 42 points behind, the largest single contributor to DUHP's edge.
- 2BGCP generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3DUHP's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | BGCP | DUHP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -11.5% | — |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 0% | — |
| Gross margin | 80% | — |
| Operating margin | 11.9% | — |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 19.2% | — |
| Debt to equity | 1.6 | — |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | BGCP | DUHP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | — | 1.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | — | 0.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | — | 2.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | — | 8.8% |
| Year to date | — | 12.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | — | 11.3% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | BGCP | DUHP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | — | 49.9 |
| ADX (14) | — | 8.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | — | 0.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | — | 5.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | — | 10% |
Risk
DUHP is the more resilient| Metric | BGCP | DUHP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | — | 0.87 |
| Sharpe ratio | — | 0.7 |
| Sortino ratio | — | 1.08 |
| Max drawdown | — | -9.2% |
| Current drawdown | — | -1.3% |
| Annualized volatility | — | 11.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | — | -1.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BGCP or DUHP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DUHP is the stronger of the two as of Nov 1, 2026, scoring 56 against BGCP's 45. The edge comes from risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BGCP or DUHP the better buy right now?
DUHP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Nov 1, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 2 of 3 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DUHP over BGCP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DUHP leads Risk Resilience by 42 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which is better value, BGCP or DUHP?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BGCP or DUHP?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BGCP or DUHP?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BGCP or DUHP?
DUHP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DUHP on Risk Resilience, by 42 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BGCP more profitable than DUHP?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is DUHP's lead over BGCP getting stronger or weaker?
DUHP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 11 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-07-01 and 2026-10-30. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the BGCP vs DUHP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BGCP closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 42 points behind, the largest single contributor to DUHP's edge; BGCP generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; DUHP's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BGCP and DUHP?
BGCP: No active signals. DUHP: 5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. On DUHP it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.