BTE vs JPM Stock Comparison
JPM currently leads BTE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 53 vs 49. The clearest difference is quality, while BTE has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between BTE and JPM?
JPM leads the current stock comparison as JPMorgan Chase & Co., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Baytex Energy Corp. vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.
JPM leads
JPM leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 7 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 5 evidence groups support JPM, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Baytex Energy Corp.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JPM over BTE, 53 versus 49 as of Oct 31, 2026. JPM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while BTE holds the stronger momentum profile. JPM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor JPM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. JPM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Baytex Energy Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BTE and JPM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum78 vs 61BTE +17
- Quality31 vs 46JPM +15
- Value34 vs 44JPM +10
- Risk Resilience66 vs 69Even
2 of 5 evidence groups favor JPM. JPM’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; BTE keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 8 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
JPM's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BTE and JPM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
BTE (Baytex Energy Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 26% against 13%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JPMJPM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BTEBTE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JPMJPM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
BTEBTE on the Momentum factor, by 17 points.
Lower downside
JPMJPM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | BTE | JPM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +10.7% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +32.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 13 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor JPM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JPM | 49 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | BTEon balance | revenue growth 36.6% vs -7.6%; EPS growth 3.7% vs -27.6%; TTM ROE -26.4% vs 17.9%; gross margin 4.7% vs 63.2%; operating margin 51.1% vs 28.2% — BTE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JPM | Value 34 vs 44 |
| Technicals | BTE | Price vs 50-day 9.6% vs -2%; vs 200-day 24.4% vs 5.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 66 vs 69 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BTE and JPM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JPM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28JPM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JPM +4
- 49 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- JPM +1
- 49 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- JPM +7
- 37 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- JPM +4
- 48 vs 52
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 9 when BTE moved ahead of JPM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only BTE
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.9%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only JPM
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
JPM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.19%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.9%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BTE closes the Quality gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge.
- 2BTE's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3JPM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate JPM's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BTE leads on balance| Metric | BTE | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 36.6% | -7.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.7% | -27.6% |
| Gross margin | 4.7% | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | 51.1% | 28.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -26.4% | 17.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.07 | 3.32 |
Performance
BTE leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | BTE | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 20.5% | 2.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 28.2% | -3.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.2% | 9.7% |
| Year to date | 67.7% | 5.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 128.5% | 12.9% |
Technicals
BTE has the stronger structure| Metric | BTE | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 81 | 60.9 |
| ADX (14) | 31.4 | 15 |
| Price vs 50-day | 9.6% | -2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 24.4% | 5.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 26% | 13% |
Risk
Split| Metric | BTE | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.31 | 0.73 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.18 | 0.41 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.5 | 0.56 |
| Max drawdown | -27.6% | -15.5% |
| Current drawdown | -1.3% | -7.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 42.5% | 22% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.2% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BTE or JPM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JPM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 53 against BTE's 49. The edge comes from quality and value. BTE is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BTE or JPM the better buy right now?
JPM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JPM over BTE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BTE leads Momentum by 17 points; JPM leads Quality by 15 points; JPM leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BTE or JPM?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for BTE and +10.7% for JPM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BTE or JPM?
JPM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JPM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BTE or JPM?
BTE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BTE or JPM?
BTE on the Momentum factor, by 17 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BTE or JPM?
JPM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JPM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BTE more profitable than JPM?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 4.7% vs 63.2%; operating margin 51.1% vs 28.2%; ttm roe -26.4% vs 17.9%. BTE leads on one measure and JPM on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is JPM's lead over BTE getting stronger or weaker?
JPM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-09, when BTE moved ahead of JPM.
What would change the BTE vs JPM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BTE closes the Quality gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge; BTE's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; JPM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate JPM's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about BTE and JPM?
BTE: 6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. JPM: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BTE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On JPM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BTE and JPM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.