BYND vs JPM Stock Comparison
JPM currently leads BYND in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 53 vs 30. The clearest difference is quality, while BYND has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between BYND and JPM?
JPM leads the current stock comparison as JPMorgan Chase & Co., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Beyond Meat, Inc. vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.
JPM leads
JPM leads by 23 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 16 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors BYND on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support JPM, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Beyond Meat, Inc.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JPM over BYND, 53 versus 30 as of Oct 31, 2026. JPM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while BYND holds the stronger value profile. JPM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BYND. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JPM today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. JPM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 23 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Beyond Meat, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare BYND and JPM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality1 vs 46JPM +45
- Risk Resilience25 vs 69JPM +44
- Momentum35 vs 61JPM +26
- Value59 vs 44BYND +15
4 of 6 evidence groups favor JPM. JPM’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; BYND keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
JPM's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — BYND and JPM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
BYND (Beyond Meat, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 55.4% against 13%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JPMJPM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BYNDBYND on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BYNDBYND on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
JPMJPM on the Momentum factor, by 26 points.
Lower downside
JPMJPM on Risk Resilience, by 44 points.
Analyst upside
BYNDBYND on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors JPM, analyst targets favor BYND. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | BYND | JPM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +44.7% | +10.7% | BYND has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +32.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Strong Sell | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JPM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JPM | 30 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | JPMon balance | revenue growth 18.3% vs -7.6%; EPS growth 147.9% vs -27.6%; TTM ROE -155% vs 17.9%; gross margin 1.8% vs 63.2%; operating margin -82.7% vs 28.2% — JPM takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BYND | Value 59 vs 44 |
| Technicals | JPM | Price vs 50-day -30.1% vs -2%; vs 200-day -62.3% vs 5.2% |
| Risk Resilience | JPM | Risk Resilience 25 vs 69 |
| Analyst expectations | BYND | Target upside 44.7% vs 10.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of BYND and JPM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 23 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JPM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28JPM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 23 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- JPM +23
- 30 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- JPM +21
- 29 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- JPM +16
- 28 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- JPM +21
- 31 vs 52
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only BYND
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (91.64%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (7.62%)
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only JPM
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.57%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
JPM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -6.37%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.9%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BYND closes the Quality gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge.
- 2BYND's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3JPM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JPM leads on balance| Metric | BYND | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.3% | -7.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 147.9% | -27.6% |
| Gross margin | 1.8% | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | -82.7% | 28.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -155% | 17.9% |
| Debt to equity | 7.19 | 3.32 |
Performance
JPM leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | BYND | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.5% | 1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.7% | 2.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -57.2% | -3.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -70.8% | 9.7% |
| Year to date | -71% | 5.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -89.1% | 12.9% |
Technicals
JPM has the stronger structure| Metric | BYND | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41 | 60.9 |
| ADX (14) | 44.5 | 15 |
| Price vs 50-day | -30.1% | -2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -62.3% | 5.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 55.4% | 13% |
Risk
JPM is the more resilient| Metric | BYND | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.65 | 0.73 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.47 | 0.41 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.9 | 0.56 |
| Max drawdown | -88.9% | -15.5% |
| Current drawdown | -88% | -7.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 108.9% | 22% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9.6% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, BYND or JPM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JPM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 53 against BYND's 30. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. BYND is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is BYND or JPM the better buy right now?
JPM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JPM over BYND?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JPM leads Quality by 45 points; JPM leads Risk Resilience by 44 points; JPM leads Momentum by 26 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, BYND or JPM?
Analyst price targets imply +44.7% upside for BYND and +10.7% for JPM, so the Street currently favors BYND. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors JPM. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, BYND or JPM?
BYND is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BYND on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, BYND or JPM?
BYND on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, BYND or JPM?
JPM on the Momentum factor, by 26 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, BYND or JPM?
JPM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JPM on Risk Resilience, by 44 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is BYND more profitable than JPM?
JPM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 1.8% vs 63.2%; operating margin -82.7% vs 28.2%; ttm roe -155% vs 17.9%.
Is JPM's lead over BYND getting stronger or weaker?
JPM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 23 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the BYND vs JPM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BYND closes the Quality gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge; BYND's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; JPM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about BYND and JPM?
BYND: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. JPM: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on BYND is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On JPM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare BYND and JPM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.