CLX vs SPY Stock Comparison
SPY currently leads CLX in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 46. The clearest difference is quality, while CLX has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between CLX and SPY?
SPY leads the current stock comparison as State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
The Clorox Company vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
SPY leads
SPY leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Fragile: 2 of 4 evidence groups support SPY.
The Clorox Company
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPY over CLX, 56 versus 46 as of Nov 7, 2026. SPY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while CLX holds the stronger momentum profile. SPY also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPY today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree.
Compare The Clorox Company and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare CLX and SPY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality19 vs 84SPY +65
- Momentum84 vs 24CLX +60
- Risk Resilience36 vs 77SPY +41
- Value45 vs 43Even
2 of 4 evidence groups favor SPY. SPY’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; CLX keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
The central trade-off
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
CLX (The Clorox Company): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 35.5% against 19.9%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SPYSPY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
CLXCLX on the Momentum factor, by 60 points.
Lower downside
SPYSPY on Risk Resilience, by 41 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | CLX | SPY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -6.4% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | +26.7% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | — | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | — | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SPY | 46 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Even | Value 45 vs 43 |
| Technicals | CLX | Price vs 50-day 14% vs -4%; vs 200-day 0.5% vs 0.9% |
| Risk Resilience | SPY | Risk Resilience 36 vs 77 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CLX and SPY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- Only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPY.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1CLX closes the Quality gap — currently 65 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPY's edge.
- 2CLX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3SPY starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | CLX | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 16.6% | — |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -13% | — |
| Gross margin | 42.3% | — |
| Operating margin | 24.7% | — |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -18.9% | — |
| Debt to equity | 61.33 | — |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | CLX | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 12.1% | -2.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 17.3% | -5.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.2% | -4.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 8.5% | -0.3% |
| Year to date | -0.9% | 7.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -8.8% | 8.5% |
Technicals
CLX has the stronger structure| Metric | CLX | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 77 | 34.9 |
| ADX (14) | 29.2 | 18 |
| Price vs 50-day | 14% | -4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.5% | 19.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CLX or SPY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SPY is the stronger of the two as of Nov 7, 2026, scoring 56 against CLX's 46. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. CLX is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CLX or SPY the better buy right now?
SPY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Nov 7, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SPY over CLX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SPY leads Quality by 65 points; CLX leads Momentum by 60 points; SPY leads Risk Resilience by 41 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CLX or SPY?
Analyst price targets imply -6.4% upside for CLX and not covered for SPY. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CLX or SPY?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CLX or SPY?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CLX or SPY?
CLX on the Momentum factor, by 60 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CLX or SPY?
SPY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SPY on Risk Resilience, by 41 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CLX more profitable than SPY?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
What would change the CLX vs SPY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: CLX closes the Quality gap — currently 65 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPY's edge; CLX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; SPY starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.