CRM vs ORCL Stock Comparison
Compare CRM and ORCL across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between CRM and ORCL?
CRM leads the current stock comparison as Salesforce, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Salesforce, Inc. vs Oracle Corporation
CRM leads
CRM leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the lead has widened from 2 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors ORCL on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support CRM, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Salesforce, Inc.
Oracle Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CRM over ORCL, 68 versus 60 as of Sep 9, 2026. CRM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while ORCL holds the stronger quality profile. CRM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors ORCL. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CRM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. CRM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Salesforce, Inc. and Oracle Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare CRM and ORCL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum95 vs 68CRM +27
- Risk Resilience40 vs 26CRM +14
- Quality64 vs 70ORCL +6
- Value64 vs 61Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor CRM. CRM’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; ORCL keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-07, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-06.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
CRM's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CRM and ORCL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CRM (Salesforce, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
ORCL (Oracle Corporation): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CRMCRM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
CRMCRM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
CRMCRM on the Momentum factor, by 27 points.
Lower downside
CRMCRM on Risk Resilience, by 14 points.
Analyst upside
ORCLORCL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors CRM, analyst targets favor ORCL. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | CRM | ORCL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.3% | +50.2% | ORCL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +46.8% | +94.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 19 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CRM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CRM | 68 vs 60 |
| Fundamentals | ORCLon balance | revenue growth 1.9% vs 11.6%; EPS growth 77% vs 14.8%; TTM ROE 20.2% vs 50.6%; gross margin 77.3% vs 65.8%; operating margin 21.4% vs 30.8% — ORCL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 64 vs 61 |
| Technicals | CRM | Price vs 50-day 30% vs 16.2%; vs 200-day 29.1% vs -5.9% |
| Risk Resilience | CRM | Risk Resilience 40 vs 26 |
| Analyst expectations | ORCL | Target upside 7.3% vs 50.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CRM and ORCL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CRM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 28 – Sep 7CRM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CRM +8
- 68 vs 60
- 7 sessions ago
- CRM +13
- 68 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- CRM +2
- 62 vs 60
- 90 sessions ago
- CRM +11
- 56 vs 45
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Aug 17 when ORCL moved ahead of CRM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.75%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (20.70%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.27%)
CRM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.9%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.36%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ORCL closes the Momentum gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to CRM's edge.
- 2ORCL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3CRM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ORCL leads on balance| Metric | CRM | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 1.9% | 11.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 77% | 14.8% |
| Gross margin | 77.3% | 65.8% |
| Operating margin | 21.4% | 30.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 20.2% | 50.6% |
| Debt to equity | 1.09 | 3.67 |
Performance
CRM leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | CRM | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.3% | 5.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 34.5% | 8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 37.4% | -25.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 28.3% | 3.8% |
| Year to date | -2.1% | -18.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 1.1% | -28.9% |
Technicals
CRM has the stronger structure| Metric | CRM | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 83.4 | 61.5 |
| ADX (14) | 38.2 | 14.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 30% | 16.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 29.1% | -5.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 85.7% | 50.4% |
Risk
CRM is the more resilient| Metric | CRM | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.48 | 2.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.27 | -0.24 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.49 | -0.5 |
| Max drawdown | -43.6% | -65% |
| Current drawdown | -2.6% | -51.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 47.3% | 67.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.1% | -5.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CRM or ORCL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CRM is the stronger of the two as of Sep 9, 2026, scoring 68 against ORCL's 60. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. ORCL is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CRM or ORCL the better buy right now?
CRM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 9, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CRM over ORCL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CRM leads Momentum by 27 points; CRM leads Risk Resilience by 14 points; ORCL leads Quality by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, CRM or ORCL?
Analyst price targets imply +7.3% upside for CRM and +50.2% for ORCL, so the Street currently favors ORCL. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors CRM. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CRM or ORCL?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CRM or ORCL?
CRM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CRM or ORCL?
CRM on the Momentum factor, by 27 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CRM or ORCL?
CRM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CRM on Risk Resilience, by 14 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CRM more profitable than ORCL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 77.3% vs 65.8%; operating margin 21.4% vs 30.8%; ttm roe 20.2% vs 50.6%. CRM leads on one measure and ORCL on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CRM's lead over ORCL getting stronger or weaker?
CRM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 2 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-28 and 2026-09-07. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-17, when ORCL moved ahead of CRM.
What would change the CRM vs ORCL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ORCL closes the Momentum gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to CRM's edge; ORCL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; CRM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CRM and ORCL?
CRM: 4 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. ORCL: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CRM is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On ORCL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare CRM and ORCL with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.