DGS vs DIV: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
DGS and DIV are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. DGS is WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund, while DIV is Global X - SuperDividend U.S. ETF. DGS is broader by holdings count, with 1,029 positions versus 52 for DIV. DIV is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight.
What is the main difference between DGS and DIV?
DGS holds 1,029 positions to DIV's 52, and 0% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | DGS | DIV |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.45% |
| Holdings | 1,029 | 52 |
| Top-10 concentration | 10.3% | 26% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 3.8% | 6.65% |
| Average volume | 39,614 | 205,432 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +9.7% | +11.4% |
| YTD return | +9.3% | +9.8% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +7.7% | +5.3% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 17.9% | 10.3% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -10.4% | -6.6% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -24.6% | -21.1% |
| Beta | 1.08 | 0.12 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.42 | 0.65 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 54/100 | 54/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Momentum | 38/100 | 47/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 80/100 | 67/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund vs Global X - SuperDividend U.S. ETF
DGS and DIV are effectively level
DGS and DIV are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
Global X - SuperDividend U.S. ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate DGS and DIV as of Oct 21, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund and Global X - SuperDividend U.S. ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
DGS vs DIV: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | DGS | DIV | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.58% | 0.45% | DIV |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 1,029 | 52 | DGS |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 10.3% | 26% | DGS |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 3.8% | 6.65% | DIV |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -24.6% | -21.1% | DIV |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 17.9% | 10.3% | DIV |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DGS and DIV against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience80 vs 67DGS +13
- Momentum38 vs 47DIV +9
- Quality41 vs 45DIV +4
- Value66 vs 64Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
DGS's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DGS and DIV both carry a full feed there.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | DGS | DIV | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.45% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 1,029 | 52 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 39,614 | 205,432 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 17.9% | 10.3% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -10.4% | -6.6% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.42 | 0.65 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 1.08 | 0.12 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
How much of the same holdings they own
DGS and DIV share 0% of their weighted exposure across 0 common holdings.
1,004 holdings are unique to DGS, and 50 holdings are unique to DIV. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
DIV is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 26.03% of the fund, against 10.28% for DGS (52 holdings vs 1,029). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
What DGS adds that DIV doesn’t
| Holding | DGS | DIV |
|---|---|---|
| 3481.TWInnoLux Corp | 2.33% | Not held |
| GRT.JOGrowthpoint Properties Ltd | 1.15% | Not held |
| BBAJIOO.MXBanco Del Bajio Sa | 1.01% | Not held |
| OMU.JOOld Mutual Ltd | 0.99% | Not held |
| 6239.TWPowertech Technology Inc | 0.96% | Not held |
| 2313.TWCompeq Manufacturing Co | 0.94% | Not held |
What DIV adds that DGS doesn’t
| Holding | DIV | DGS |
|---|---|---|
| TENTSAKOS ENERGY NAVIGATION LTD | 3.65% | Not held |
| TIGOMILLICOM INTL CELLULAR S.A. | 2.87% | Not held |
| CBLCBL & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES | 2.85% | Not held |
| SFLSFL CORP LTD | 2.57% | Not held |
| PAAPLAINS ALL AMER PIPELINE LP | 2.47% | Not held |
| UANCVR PARTNERS LP | 2.45% | Not held |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
DGS vs DIV: five-year payout growth
DGS grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 2.31% a year against DIV's -1.37%. DIV: The 2020 payout was 25.6% below 2019, so the growth rate measures a recovery from a weak starting year.
| Dividend metric | DGS | DIV |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | 2.31% | -1.37% |
| 2020 annual payout | $1.761 | $1.354 |
| 2025 annual payout | $1.974 | $1.264 |
| Calendar-year declines | 2 | 3 |
| Peer rank | #27 of 33 | #32 of 33 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 54 vs 54 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Even | Value 66 vs 64 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -1.7% vs -2.2%; vs 200-day -0.7% vs -0.8% |
| Risk Resilience | DGS | Risk Resilience 80 vs 67 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
How the comparison changed
95 daily snapshots · Jun 22 – Oct 20DGS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 54 vs 54
- 7 sessions ago
- DGS +1
- 54 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- DGS +4
- 54 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 54 vs 54
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Sep 3 when DGS moved ahead of DIV.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only DGS
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only DIV
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.1%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.21%, AIQ +2 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
DIV leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | DGS | DIV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.1% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.6% | -1.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 0.1% | -3.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2% | -0.4% |
| Year to date | 9.3% | 9.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 9.7% | 11.4% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | DGS | DIV |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.6 | 56.3 |
| ADX (14) | 15.2 | 31.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.7% | -2.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.7% | -0.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.2% | 10.9% |
Risk
DGS is the more resilient| Metric | DGS | DIV |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.08 | 0.12 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.42 | 0.65 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.62 | 1.07 |
| Max drawdown | -10.4% | -6.6% |
| Current drawdown | -6.1% | -5.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.9% | 10.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.9% | -1% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between DGS and DIV?
DGS holds 1,029 positions to DIV's 52, and 0% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do DGS and DIV overlap?
DGS and DIV share 0% of their weighted exposure across 0 common holdings. 1,004 holdings are unique to DGS, and 50 holdings are unique to DIV. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, DGS or DIV?
DGS holds more positions: 1,029 versus 52 for DIV.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
DIV has the lower expense ratio, 0.45% a year against 0.58% for DGS.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
DIV, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 6.65% against 3.8% for DGS.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
DGS has been more volatile over the past year, at 17.9% annualized against 10.3% for DIV.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
DIV fell less from peak to trough over the past five years: -21.1% against -24.6% for DGS.
Compare DGS and DIV with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.