DHS vs DIVO: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
DHS and DIVO are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. DHS is WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund, while DIVO is Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF. DHS is broader by holdings count, with 319 positions versus 42 for DIVO. DIVO is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight.
What is the main difference between DHS and DIVO?
DHS holds 319 positions to DIVO's 42, and 11% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | DHS | DIVO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.38% | 0.56% |
| Holdings | 319 | 42 |
| Top-10 concentration | 34.9% | 49.8% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 3.17% | 6.28% |
| Average volume | 31,705 | 801,828 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +17.9% | +9.4% |
| YTD return | +14.8% | +7.9% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +12.1% | +10.9% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 10.6% | 9.7% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -6.6% | -6.7% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -15.3% | -13.7% |
| Beta | 0.19 | 0.52 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.15 | 0.49 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.13 | 0.78 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Momentum | 80/100 | 79/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 69/100 | 76/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund vs Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
DHS and DIVO are effectively level
DHS and DIVO are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate DHS and DIVO as of Oct 21, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
DHS vs DIVO: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | DHS | DIVO | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.38% | 0.56% | DHS |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 319 | 42 | DHS |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 34.9% | 49.8% | DHS |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 3.17% | 6.28% | DIVO |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -15.3% | -13.7% | Similar |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 10.6% | 9.7% | Similar |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DHS and DIVO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value59 vs 40DHS +19
- Quality40 vs 57DIVO +17
- Risk Resilience69 vs 76DIVO +7
- Momentum80 vs 79Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +20
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
DIVO's lead narrowed by 5 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DHS and DIVO both carry a full feed there.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | DHS | DIVO | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.38% | 0.56% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 319 | 42 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 31,705 | 801,828 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 10.6% | 9.7% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -6.6% | -6.7% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.15 | 0.49 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.19 | 0.52 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.
How much of the same holdings they own
DHS and DIVO share 10.56% of their weighted exposure across 6 common holdings.
311 holdings are unique to DHS, and 35 holdings are unique to DIVO. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
DIVO is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 49.81% of the fund, against 34.85% for DHS (42 holdings vs 319). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | DHS | DIVO | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Co Inc/NJ | 4.75% | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.79% | 4.88% | 2.79% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 1.73% | 1.82% | 1.73% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc | 2.84% | 1.09% | 1.09% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp | 1.68% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co | 0.48% | 1.93% | 0.48% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
What DHS adds that DIVO doesn’t
| Holding | DHS | DIVO |
|---|---|---|
| ABBVAbbVie Inc | 5.09% | Not held |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp | 3.73% | Not held |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 3.65% | Not held |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc | 3.31% | Not held |
| TAT&T Inc | 3.2% | Not held |
| TXNTexas Instruments Inc | 2.96% | Not held |
What DIVO adds that DHS doesn’t
| Holding | DIVO | DHS |
|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.25% | Not held |
| AAPLApple Inc | 5.59% | Not held |
| CATCaterpillar Inc | 5.22% | Not held |
| VVisa Inc | 5.12% | Not held |
| JPMJPMORGAN CHASE & CO. | 4.94% | Not held |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 4.94% | Not held |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
DHS vs DIVO: five-year payout growth
DIVO grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 12.25% a year against DHS's 3.32%. DHS: A single payment in an endpoint year was 3.0x the fund's median payment, so one distribution carries much of the result. DIVO: The 2020 payout was 35.8% below 2019, so the growth rate measures a recovery from a weak starting year. DIVO: The payout jumped 50.7% in 2025, a single step rather than steady compounding - often an index or mandate change. DIVO: A single payment in an endpoint year was 6.4x the fund's median payment, so one distribution carries much of the result.
| Dividend metric | DHS | DIVO |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | 3.32% | 12.25% |
| 2020 annual payout | $2.871 | $1.608 |
| 2025 annual payout | $3.380 | $2.866 |
| Calendar-year declines | 2 | 1 |
| Peer rank | #25 of 33 | #4 of 33 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 60 vs 60 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | DHS | Value 59 vs 40 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day 0.4% vs 0.9%; vs 200-day 3.9% vs 3.5% |
| Risk Resilience | DIVO | Risk Resilience 69 vs 76 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
How the comparison changed
41 daily snapshots · Sep 8 – Oct 20DIVO lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 60 vs 60
- 7 sessions ago
- DIVO +4
- 54 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- DIVO +1
- 48 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- Not covered
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 16 when DIVO moved ahead of DHS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 2 bearish / 3 neutral, conflicted
Only DHS
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
6 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only DIVO
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.8%)
Both carry 7 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling, Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 5 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.24%, AIQ +5 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.31%, AIQ 0 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
DHS leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | DHS | DIVO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.8% | 1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 1.9% | 1.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 0.1% | 2.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.5% | 4.8% |
| Year to date | 14.8% | 7.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 17.9% | 9.4% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | DHS | DIVO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 74.4 | 84.1 |
| ADX (14) | 26.8 | 22.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 3.9% | 3.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 11.1% | 7.3% |
Risk
DIVO is the more resilient| Metric | DHS | DIVO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.19 | 0.52 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.15 | 0.49 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.13 | 0.78 |
| Max drawdown | -6.6% | -6.7% |
| Current drawdown | -2.5% | -1.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 10.6% | 9.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -0.9% | -1% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between DHS and DIVO?
DHS holds 319 positions to DIVO's 42, and 11% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do DHS and DIVO overlap?
DHS and DIVO share 10.56% of their weighted exposure across 6 common holdings. 311 holdings are unique to DHS, and 35 holdings are unique to DIVO. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, DHS or DIVO?
DHS holds more positions: 319 versus 42 for DIVO.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
DHS has the lower expense ratio, 0.38% a year against 0.56% for DIVO.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
DIVO, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 6.28% against 3.17% for DHS.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
Their volatility over the past year is similar: 10.6% annualized for DHS and 9.7% for DIVO.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
Their worst peak-to-trough falls over the past five years are similar: -15.3% for DHS and -13.7% for DIVO.
Compare DHS and DIVO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.