DIVB vs DVY: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
DIVB and DVY are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. DIVB is iShares Core Dividend ETF, while DVY is iShares Select Dividend ETF. DIVB is broader by holdings count, with 384 positions versus 102 for DVY. DIVB is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight.
What is the main difference between DIVB and DVY?
DIVB holds 384 positions to DVY's 102, and 25% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | DIVB | DVY |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.38% |
| Holdings | 384 | 102 |
| Top-10 concentration | 31.5% | 19.5% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 2.13% | 3.35% |
| Average volume | 256,272 | 375,038 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +35.7% | +14.5% |
| YTD return | +30% | +13% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +13.9% | +9.7% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 13% | 11.4% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -7.4% | -8.1% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -21.1% | -17.5% |
| Beta | 0.46 | 0.25 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.08 | 0.85 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.41 | 1.50 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 62/100 | 62/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Momentum | 80/100 | 68/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 80/100 | 71/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
iShares Core Dividend ETF vs iShares Select Dividend ETF
DIVB and DVY are effectively level
DIVB and DVY are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
iShares Core Dividend ETF
iShares Select Dividend ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate DIVB and DVY as of Oct 21, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare iShares Core Dividend ETF and iShares Select Dividend ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
DIVB vs DVY: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | DIVB | DVY | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.05% | 0.38% | DIVB |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 384 | 102 | DIVB |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 31.5% | 19.5% | DVY |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 2.13% | 3.35% | DVY |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -21.1% | -17.5% | DVY |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 13% | 11.4% | DVY |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DIVB and DVY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum80 vs 68DIVB +12
- Risk Resilience80 vs 71DIVB +9
- Quality48 vs 56DVY +8
- Value53 vs 59DVY +6
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +4, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DIVB and DVY both carry a full feed there.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | DIVB | DVY | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.38% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 384 | 102 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 256,272 | 375,038 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 13% | 11.4% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -7.4% | -8.1% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.08 | 0.85 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.46 | 0.25 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
How much of the same holdings they own
DIVB and DVY share 24.7% of their weighted exposure across 88 common holdings.
293 holdings are unique to DIVB, and 10 holdings are unique to DVY. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
DIVB is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 31.53% of the fund, against 19.46% for DVY (384 holdings vs 102). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | DIVB | DVY | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| HPQHP INC | 2.98% | 2.44% | 2.44% |
| VZVERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC | 1.52% | 1.86% | 1.52% |
| CVXCHEVRON | 1.74% | 1.48% | 1.48% |
| PFEPFIZER | 1.29% | 2.25% | 1.29% |
| TAT&T | 1.23% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
| MRKMERCK & CO INC | 1.45% | 1.14% | 1.14% |
| PMPHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC | 1.12% | 1.11% | 1.11% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 2.39% | 1.03% | 1.03% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
What DIVB adds that DVY doesn’t
| Holding | DIVB | DVY |
|---|---|---|
| ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC | 5.45% | Not held |
| 0Y0Y.LACCENTURE PLC CLASS A | 4.98% | Not held |
| IBMINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES | 3.88% | 0.84% |
| JPMJPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 2.68% | Not held |
| CTSHCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CLA | 2.6% | Not held |
| PAYXPAYCHEX | 2.54% | Not held |
What DVY adds that DIVB doesn’t
| Holding | DVY | DIVB |
|---|---|---|
| PRUPRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC | 2.15% | 0.27% |
| MOALTRIA GROUP INC | 2.09% | 0.93% |
| TROWT ROWE PRICE GROUP | 2.06% | 0.13% |
| OKEONEOK | 1.85% | 0.23% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 1.71% | 0.4% |
| GISGENERAL MILLS INC | 1.55% | 0.23% |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
DIVB vs DVY: five-year payout growth
DIVB grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 13.96% a year against DVY's 7.87%. DVY never reduced its annual distribution in the window; DIVB did in 1 year. DIVB: The payout jumped 72.2% in 2023, a single step rather than steady compounding - often an index or mandate change.
| Dividend metric | DIVB | DVY |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | 13.96% | 7.87% |
| 2020 annual payout | $0.691 | $3.523 |
| 2025 annual payout | $1.328 | $5.145 |
| Calendar-year declines | 1 | 0 |
| Peer rank | #1 of 33 | #9 of 33 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 62 vs 62 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | DVY | Value 53 vs 59 |
| Technicals | DIVB | Price vs 50-day 3.4% vs -0.2%; vs 200-day 15% vs 2.6% |
| Risk Resilience | DIVB | Risk Resilience 80 vs 71 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
How the comparison changed
95 daily snapshots · Jun 22 – Oct 20DVY lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 62 vs 62
- 7 sessions ago
- DIVB +2
- 63 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- DVY +2
- 50 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- DVY +1
- 59 vs 60
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Oct 15 when DIVB moved ahead of DVY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
6 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only DIVB
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.2%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 6 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling, BB Upper Band Breach, Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.13%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.09%, AIQ 0 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
DIVB leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | DIVB | DVY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.2% | 2.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 5% | 2.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 9.7% | -1.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 23.8% | 4.5% |
| Year to date | 30% | 13% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 35.7% | 14.5% |
Technicals
DIVB has the stronger structure| Metric | DIVB | DVY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 84.7 | 75.5 |
| ADX (14) | 26.4 | 26.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.4% | -0.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 15% | 2.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13.1% | 11.7% |
Risk
DIVB is the more resilient| Metric | DIVB | DVY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.46 | 0.25 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.08 | 0.85 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.41 | 1.5 |
| Max drawdown | -7.4% | -8.1% |
| Current drawdown | 0% | -3.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 13% | 11.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.2% | -1% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between DIVB and DVY?
DIVB holds 384 positions to DVY's 102, and 25% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do DIVB and DVY overlap?
DIVB and DVY share 24.7% of their weighted exposure across 88 common holdings. 293 holdings are unique to DIVB, and 10 holdings are unique to DVY. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, DIVB or DVY?
DIVB holds more positions: 384 versus 102 for DVY.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
DIVB has the lower expense ratio, 0.05% a year against 0.38% for DVY.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
DVY, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 3.35% against 2.13% for DIVB.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
DIVB has been more volatile over the past year, at 13% annualized against 11.4% for DVY.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
DVY fell less from peak to trough over the past five years: -17.5% against -21.1% for DIVB.
Compare DIVB and DVY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.