DOV vs JPM Stock Comparison
DOV currently leads JPM in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 65 vs 52. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between DOV and JPM?
DOV leads the current stock comparison as Dover Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Dover Corporation vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.
DOV leads
DOV leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support DOV, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Dover Corporation
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DOV over JPM, 65 versus 52 as of Oct 21, 2026. DOV's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value. DOV also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DOV today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. DOV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions. DOV leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Dover Corporation and JPMorgan Chase & Co. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DOV and JPM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum76 vs 58DOV +18
- Value59 vs 44DOV +15
- Quality56 vs 46DOV +10
- Risk Resilience75 vs 68DOV +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor DOV. DOV’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
DOV's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DOV and JPM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DOV (Dover Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DOVDOV on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DOVDOV on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DOVDOV on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
DOVDOV on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
DOVDOV on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
DOVDOV on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DOV | JPM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +23.6% | +11.3% | DOV has more room |
| Target dispersion | +21.1% | +32.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | DOV | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 1.00% | 9.04% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.970 | $3.600 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.070 | $5.550 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #343 | #120 |
JPM grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 9.04% a year against DOV's 1.00%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DOV. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DOV | 65 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | JPMon balance | revenue growth 6.6% vs -7.6%; EPS growth 31.1% vs -27.6%; TTM ROE 15% vs 17.9%; gross margin 39.6% vs 63.2%; operating margin 16.9% vs 28.2% — JPM takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DOV | Value 59 vs 44 |
| Technicals | JPM | Price vs 50-day 2.9% vs -3.4%; vs 200-day -6% vs 4% |
| Risk Resilience | DOV | Risk Resilience 75 vs 68 |
| Analyst expectations | DOV | Target upside 23.6% vs 11.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DOV and JPM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DOV.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DOV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DOV +13
- 65 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- DOV +11
- 58 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- DOV +13
- 56 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- DOV +3
- 56 vs 53
The lead changed hands 11 times in this window, most recently on Sep 14 when DOV moved ahead of JPM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
Only DOV
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (7.96%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish
Only JPM
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.65%)
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
DOV leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.37%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.02%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1JPM closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to DOV's edge.
- 2JPM generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3DOV's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JPM leads on balance| Metric | DOV | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 6.6% | -7.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 31.1% | -27.6% |
| Gross margin | 39.6% | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | 16.9% | 28.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 15% | 17.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.42 | 3.32 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | DOV | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.4% | 1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 5.7% | -1.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.1% | -3.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10.5% | 7.1% |
| Year to date | 1% | 4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 18.7% | 12.3% |
Technicals
JPM has the stronger structure| Metric | DOV | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 77.4 | 57.4 |
| ADX (14) | 17.5 | 20.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.9% | -3.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -6% | 4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 15.1% | 14.8% |
Risk
DOV is the more resilient| Metric | DOV | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.94 | 0.75 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.63 | 0.47 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.99 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown | -20.2% | -15.5% |
| Current drawdown | -15.5% | -8.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.2% | 22.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.4% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DOV or JPM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DOV is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 65 against JPM's 52. The edge comes from momentum and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DOV or JPM the better buy right now?
DOV carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DOV over JPM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DOV leads Momentum by 18 points; DOV leads Value by 15 points; DOV leads Quality by 10 points. DOV leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by JPM simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, DOV or JPM?
Analyst price targets imply +23.6% upside for DOV and +11.3% for JPM, so the Street currently favors DOV. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DOV or JPM?
DOV is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DOV on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DOV or JPM?
DOV on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DOV or JPM?
DOV on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DOV or JPM?
DOV is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DOV on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DOV more profitable than JPM?
JPM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 39.6% vs 63.2%; operating margin 16.9% vs 28.2%; ttm roe 15% vs 17.9%.
Is DOV's lead over JPM getting stronger or weaker?
DOV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 11 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-14, when DOV moved ahead of JPM.
What would change the DOV vs JPM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: JPM closes the Momentum gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to DOV's edge; JPM generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; DOV's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DOV and JPM?
DOV: 1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. JPM: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DOV is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On JPM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DOV and JPM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.