DRH vs JPM Stock Comparison
DRH currently leads JPM in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 67 vs 53. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between DRH and JPM?
DRH leads the current stock comparison as DiamondRock Hospitality Company, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
DiamondRock Hospitality Company vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.
DRH leads
DRH leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, but the lead has narrowed from 17 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors JPM on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support DRH, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
DiamondRock Hospitality Company
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DRH over JPM, 67 versus 53 as of Oct 31, 2026. DRH's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum. DRH also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors JPM. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DRH today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. DRH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 14 points over 30 sessions. DRH leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare DiamondRock Hospitality Company and JPMorgan Chase & Co. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DRH and JPM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value67 vs 44DRH +23
- Momentum79 vs 61DRH +18
- Quality53 vs 46DRH +7
- Risk Resilience75 vs 69DRH +6
4 of 6 evidence groups favor DRH. DRH’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 8 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
DRH's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DRH and JPM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DRH (DiamondRock Hospitality Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DRHDRH on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
DRHDRH on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
DRHDRH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 23 points.
Momentum
DRHDRH on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
DRHDRH on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
JPMJPM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DRH, analyst targets favor JPM. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | DRH | JPM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -12.4% | +10.7% | JPM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +43.2% | +32.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DRH. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DRH | 67 vs 53 |
| Fundamentals | JPMon balance | revenue growth 23.3% vs -7.6%; EPS growth 5.2% vs -27.6%; TTM ROE 10.3% vs 17.9%; gross margin 54% vs 63.2%; operating margin 16.1% vs 28.2% — JPM takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | DRH | Value 67 vs 44 |
| Technicals | DRH | Price vs 50-day 12.1% vs -2%; vs 200-day 26.6% vs 5.2% |
| Risk Resilience | DRH | Risk Resilience 75 vs 69 |
| Analyst expectations | JPM | Target upside -12.4% vs 10.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DRH and JPM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DRH.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28DRH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 14 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DRH +14
- 67 vs 53
- 7 sessions ago
- DRH +17
- 67 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- DRH +17
- 61 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- DRH +10
- 62 vs 52
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Aug 12 when DRH moved ahead of JPM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only DRH
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only JPM
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
DRH leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.45%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.9%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1JPM closes the Value gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to DRH's edge.
- 2JPM's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3DRH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 6 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 14-point move would eliminate DRH's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JPM leads on balance| Metric | DRH | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 23.3% | -7.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 5.2% | -27.6% |
| Gross margin | 54% | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | 16.1% | 28.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 10.3% | 17.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.79 | 3.32 |
Performance
DRH leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | DRH | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.3% | 1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 15.4% | 2.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 10.5% | -3.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 39.1% | 9.7% |
| Year to date | 55.5% | 5.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 81.6% | 12.9% |
Technicals
DRH has the stronger structure| Metric | DRH | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 82.3 | 60.9 |
| ADX (14) | 37.9 | 15 |
| Price vs 50-day | 12.1% | -2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 26.6% | 5.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 21.6% | 13% |
Risk
DRH is the more resilient| Metric | DRH | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.62 | 0.73 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.33 | 0.41 |
| Sortino ratio | 4.06 | 0.56 |
| Max drawdown | -10.8% | -15.5% |
| Current drawdown | 0% | -7.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.3% | 22% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.4% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DRH or JPM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DRH is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 67 against JPM's 53. The edge comes from value and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DRH or JPM the better buy right now?
DRH carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DRH over JPM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DRH leads Value by 23 points; DRH leads Momentum by 18 points; DRH leads Quality by 7 points. DRH leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by JPM simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, DRH or JPM?
Analyst price targets imply -12.4% upside for DRH and +10.7% for JPM, so the Street currently favors JPM. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DRH. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DRH or JPM?
DRH is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DRH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 23 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DRH or JPM?
DRH on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DRH or JPM?
DRH on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DRH or JPM?
DRH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DRH on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DRH more profitable than JPM?
JPM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 54% vs 63.2%; operating margin 16.1% vs 28.2%; ttm roe 10.3% vs 17.9%.
Is DRH's lead over JPM getting stronger or weaker?
DRH lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 14 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-08-12, when DRH moved ahead of JPM.
What would change the DRH vs JPM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: JPM closes the Value gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to DRH's edge; JPM's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; DRH's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 6 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 14-point move would eliminate DRH's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about DRH and JPM?
DRH: 6 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. JPM: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DRH is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On JPM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DRH and JPM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.