DUHP vs PSKY Stock Comparison
DUHP currently leads PSKY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 59 vs 46. The clearest difference is quality, while PSKY has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between DUHP and PSKY?
DUHP leads the current stock comparison as U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares vs Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock
DUHP leads
DUHP leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Competitive: 3 of 4 evidence groups support DUHP, and its current signal state is conflicted.
U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares
Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DUHP over PSKY, 59 versus 46 as of Oct 21, 2026. DUHP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while PSKY holds the stronger value profile. DUHP also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor DUHP today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. DUHP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares and Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DUHP and PSKY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality58 vs 24DUHP +34
- Risk Resilience85 vs 53DUHP +32
- Value35 vs 64PSKY +29
3 of 4 evidence groups favor DUHP. DUHP’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; PSKY keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
DUHP's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DUHP and PSKY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DUHP (U.S. High Relative Profitability Portfolio ETF Class Shares): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
PSKY (Paramount Skydance Corporation Class B Common Stock): the counter-case, on value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 55.8% against 8.1%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DUHPDUHP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
PSKYPSKY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DUHPDUHP on Risk Resilience, by 32 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DUHP | PSKY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +18.5% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +80% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor DUHP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DUHP | 59 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | PSKY | Value 35 vs 64 |
| Technicals | DUHP | Price vs 50-day 1.2% vs 6.2%; vs 200-day 5.7% vs -7.2% |
| Risk Resilience | DUHP | Risk Resilience 85 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DUHP and PSKY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DUHP.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DUHP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DUHP +13
- 59 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- DUHP +11
- 57 vs 46
- 30 sessions ago
- DUHP +12
- 57 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- DUHP +8
- 59 vs 51
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 17 when DUHP moved ahead of PSKY.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only DUHP
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.99%)
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (0.84%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.3%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
DUHP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.49%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PSKY closes the Quality gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to DUHP's edge.
- 2PSKY generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3DUHP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | DUHP | PSKY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -5.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | -73.3% |
| Gross margin | — | 28.8% |
| Operating margin | — | -18.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | -5.3% |
| Debt to equity | — | 1.29 |
Performance
DUHP leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | DUHP | PSKY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.2% | -4.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.3% | -10% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.8% | -1.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 9.2% | -0.8% |
| Year to date | 11.9% | -27.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 13.4% | -48.3% |
Technicals
DUHP has the stronger structure| Metric | DUHP | PSKY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 63.2 | 36.3 |
| ADX (14) | 8.1 | 22.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.2% | 6.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.7% | -7.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 8.1% | 55.8% |
Risk
DUHP is the more resilient| Metric | DUHP | PSKY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.87 | 0.53 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.76 | -1.09 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.17 | -1.85 |
| Max drawdown | -9.2% | -59.2% |
| Current drawdown | -0.8% | -48.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 11.8% | 51.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.3% | -4.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DUHP or PSKY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DUHP is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 59 against PSKY's 46. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. PSKY is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DUHP or PSKY the better buy right now?
DUHP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DUHP over PSKY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DUHP leads Quality by 34 points; DUHP leads Risk Resilience by 32 points; PSKY leads Value by 29 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DUHP or PSKY?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for DUHP and +18.5% for PSKY. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DUHP or PSKY?
PSKY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PSKY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DUHP or PSKY?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DUHP or PSKY?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DUHP or PSKY?
DUHP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DUHP on Risk Resilience, by 32 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DUHP more profitable than PSKY?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is DUHP's lead over PSKY getting stronger or weaker?
DUHP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-17, when DUHP moved ahead of PSKY.
What would change the DUHP vs PSKY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PSKY closes the Quality gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to DUHP's edge; PSKY generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; DUHP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DUHP and PSKY?
DUHP: 4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PSKY: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DUHP is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.