DWX vs INTC Stock Comparison
DWX currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 31. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between DWX and INTC?
DWX leads the current stock comparison as State Street SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF vs Intel Corp.
DWX leads
DWX leads by 26 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 4 of 4 evidence groups support DWX, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
State Street SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DWX over INTC, 57 versus 31 as of Oct 24, 2026. DWX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum. DWX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 4 covered evidence groups favor DWX today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the lead has swung materially session to session. DWX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 26 points over 30 sessions.
Compare State Street SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare DWX and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience78 vs 28DWX +50
- Momentum66 vs 23DWX +43
- Value60 vs 30DWX +30
- Quality36 vs 39Even
4 of 4 evidence groups favor DWX. DWX’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
Largest factor move: Momentum -13
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
DWX's lead narrowed by 5 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DWX and INTC both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DWXDWX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
DWXDWX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points.
Momentum
DWXDWX on the Momentum factor, by 43 points.
Lower downside
DWXDWX on Risk Resilience, by 50 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DWX | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +34.4% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +115.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 23 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 4 covered evidence groups favor DWX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DWX | 57 vs 31 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | DWX | Value 60 vs 30 |
| Technicals | DWX | Price vs 50-day 0% vs -14.8%; vs 200-day 0.8% vs 1.9% |
| Risk Resilience | DWX | Risk Resilience 78 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DWX and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 26 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 4 of 4 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DWX.
How the comparison changed
96 daily snapshots · Jun 24 – Oct 23DWX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 26 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DWX +26
- 57 vs 31
- 7 sessions ago
- DWX +20
- 50 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- DWX +1
- 46 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- DWX +18
- 54 vs 36
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 25 when DWX moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 3 neutral, conflicted
Only DWX
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (0.77%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Compression — neutral, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.46%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active.
DWX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.16%, AIQ -3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.72%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to DWX's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3DWX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | DWX | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | — | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | — | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.58 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | DWX | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.1% | -3.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.6% | -29.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.8% | -5.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 1.8% | 23.8% |
| Year to date | 6.9% | 135.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 9.4% | 128.1% |
Technicals
DWX has the stronger structure| Metric | DWX | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 73.3 | 16.2 |
| ADX (14) | 25.4 | 26.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0% | -14.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.8% | 1.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 11% | 50.4% |
Risk
DWX is the more resilient| Metric | DWX | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.43 | 3.1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.46 | 1.43 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.68 | 2.58 |
| Max drawdown | -8.6% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -3.5% | -38.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 11.4% | 78.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.2% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DWX or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DWX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 24, 2026, scoring 57 against INTC's 31. The edge comes from risk resilience and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DWX or INTC the better buy right now?
DWX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 24, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DWX over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DWX leads Risk Resilience by 50 points; DWX leads Momentum by 43 points; DWX leads Value by 30 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DWX or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for DWX and +34.4% for INTC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DWX or INTC?
DWX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. DWX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DWX or INTC?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DWX or INTC?
DWX on the Momentum factor, by 43 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DWX or INTC?
DWX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DWX on Risk Resilience, by 50 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DWX more profitable than INTC?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is DWX's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
DWX lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 26 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 96 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-24 and 2026-10-23. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-25, when DWX moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the DWX vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to DWX's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; DWX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DWX and INTC?
DWX: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 3 neutral, conflicted. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DWX is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.