ESS vs JPM Stock Comparison
JPM currently leads ESS in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 52 vs 45. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between ESS and JPM?
JPM leads the current stock comparison as JPMorgan Chase & Co., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Essex Property Trust, Inc. vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.
JPM leads
JPM leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from ESS.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support JPM, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Essex Property Trust, Inc.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JPM over ESS, 52 versus 45 as of Oct 22, 2026. JPM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience. JPM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JPM today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. JPM lead: Reversed — ESS led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; JPM now leads by 7.
Compare Essex Property Trust, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ESS and JPM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value28 vs 44JPM +16
- Risk Resilience54 vs 68JPM +14
- Momentum54 vs 58JPM +4
- Quality49 vs 46Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor JPM. JPM’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +24
New signals
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
JPM's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ESS and JPM both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JPMJPM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
JPMJPM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JPMJPM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
JPMJPM on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
JPMJPM on Risk Resilience, by 14 points.
Analyst upside
JPMJPM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ESS | JPM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +9.7% | +11.3% | JPM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +26.6% | +32.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 14 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | ESS | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 4.10% | 9.04% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $8.311 | $3.600 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $10.160 | $5.550 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #120 |
JPM grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 9.04% a year against ESS's 4.10%. JPM never reduced its regular dividend in the window; ESS did in 1 year. They are ranked in different cohorts — REITs and US dividend-paying corporations — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JPM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JPM | 45 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -41.2% vs -27.6%; TTM ROE 7.6% vs 17.9%; gross margin 69.4% vs 63.2%; operating margin 29.1% vs 28.2% |
| Valuation | JPM | Value 28 vs 44 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -0.9% vs -3.4%; vs 200-day 1.1% vs 4% |
| Risk Resilience | JPM | Risk Resilience 54 vs 68 |
| Analyst expectations | JPM | Target upside 9.7% vs 11.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ESS and JPM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JPM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20JPM lead: Reversed — ESS led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; JPM now leads by 7.
- Today
- JPM +7
- 45 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- JPM +4
- 43 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- ESS +1
- 44 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- JPM +10
- 43 vs 53
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Sep 29 when ESS moved ahead of JPM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only ESS
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.75%, AIQ +6 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.02%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ESS closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge.
- 2ESS's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3JPM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | ESS | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.9% | -7.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -41.2% | -27.6% |
| Gross margin | 69.4% | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | 29.1% | 28.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 7.6% | 17.9% |
| Debt to equity | 1.27 | 3.32 |
Performance
JPM leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | ESS | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.1% | 1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1% | -1.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.2% | -3.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 7.5% | 7.1% |
| Year to date | 4% | 4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 5.6% | 12.3% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | ESS | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 55 | 57.4 |
| ADX (14) | 17.3 | 20.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.9% | -3.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 1.1% | 4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.5% | 14.8% |
Risk
JPM is the more resilient| Metric | ESS | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.12 | 0.75 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.14 | 0.47 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.19 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown | -10.6% | -15.5% |
| Current drawdown | -8.8% | -8.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 19.8% | 22.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ESS or JPM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JPM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 52 against ESS's 45. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ESS or JPM the better buy right now?
JPM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JPM over ESS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JPM leads Value by 16 points; JPM leads Risk Resilience by 14 points; JPM leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ESS or JPM?
Analyst price targets imply +9.7% upside for ESS and +11.3% for JPM, so the Street currently favors JPM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ESS or JPM?
JPM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JPM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ESS or JPM?
JPM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ESS or JPM?
JPM on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ESS or JPM?
JPM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JPM on Risk Resilience, by 14 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ESS more profitable than JPM?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 69.4% vs 63.2%; operating margin 29.1% vs 28.2%; ttm roe 7.6% vs 17.9%. ESS leads on two measures and JPM on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is JPM's lead over ESS getting stronger or weaker?
JPM lead: Reversed — ESS led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; JPM now leads by 7. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-29, when ESS moved ahead of JPM.
What would change the ESS vs JPM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ESS closes the Value gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge; ESS's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; JPM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ESS and JPM?
ESS: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. JPM: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on ESS is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On JPM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ESS and JPM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.