FENI vs SLB Stock Comparison
FENI currently leads SLB in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 45. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between FENI and SLB?
FENI leads the current stock comparison as Fidelity Enhanced International ETF, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF vs Slb N.V.
FENI leads
FENI leads by 19 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 23 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 3 of 3 evidence groups support FENI, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Slb N.V.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors FENI over SLB, 64 versus 45 as of Oct 21, 2026. FENI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. FENI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 3 covered evidence groups favor FENI today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. FENI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Fidelity Enhanced International ETF and Slb N.V. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare FENI and SLB against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality68 vs 42FENI +26
- Risk Resilience83 vs 59FENI +24
- Momentum47 vs 49Even
3 of 3 evidence groups favor FENI. FENI’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +15
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
FENI's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — FENI and SLB both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
FENIFENI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
FENIFENI on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | FENI | SLB | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +24.3% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +37.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 12 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 3 covered evidence groups favor FENI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | FENI | 64 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Not covered | Not covered |
| Technicals | FENI | Price vs 50-day -1.9% vs -2.8%; vs 200-day 0.4% vs -2.3% |
| Risk Resilience | FENI | Risk Resilience 83 vs 59 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of FENI and SLB and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 19 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 3 of 3 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on FENI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20FENI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 19 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- FENI +19
- 64 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- FENI +21
- 60 vs 39
- 30 sessions ago
- FENI +23
- 61 vs 38
- 90 sessions ago
- FENI +16
- 67 vs 51
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
Only FENI
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.00%)
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.35%, AIQ +6 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.24%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SLB closes the Quality gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to FENI's edge.
- 2SLB's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3FENI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 19-point move would eliminate FENI's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | FENI | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 2.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 6% |
| Gross margin | — | 16.5% |
| Operating margin | — | 13.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 11.8% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.49 |
Performance
SLB leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | FENI | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0% | 2.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2.5% | -4.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -1.1% | 4.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.3% | -5.3% |
| Year to date | 8.8% | 30.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 12.3% | 51.8% |
Technicals
FENI has the stronger structure| Metric | FENI | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 48.1 | 57.8 |
| ADX (14) | 18.7 | 17.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.9% | -2.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.4% | -2.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 11.8% | 27.5% |
Risk
FENI is the more resilient| Metric | FENI | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.03 | 0.72 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.54 | 1.25 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.83 | 2 |
| Max drawdown | -12.1% | -22.3% |
| Current drawdown | -5.2% | -16.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 16.6% | 36.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.6% | -3.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, FENI or SLB?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, FENI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 64 against SLB's 45. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is FENI or SLB the better buy right now?
FENI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 3 of 3 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor FENI over SLB?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. FENI leads Quality by 26 points; FENI leads Risk Resilience by 24 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, FENI or SLB?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for FENI and +24.3% for SLB. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, FENI or SLB?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, FENI or SLB?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, FENI or SLB?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, FENI or SLB?
FENI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. FENI on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is FENI more profitable than SLB?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is FENI's lead over SLB getting stronger or weaker?
FENI lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 23 to 19 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the FENI vs SLB verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SLB closes the Quality gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to FENI's edge; SLB's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; FENI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 19-point move would eliminate FENI's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about FENI and SLB?
FENI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. SLB: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on FENI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SLB it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.