GRNY vs SIRI Stock Comparison
SIRI currently leads GRNY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 59 vs 49. The clearest difference is value, while GRNY has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between GRNY and SIRI?
SIRI leads the current stock comparison as Sirius XM Holdings Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Tidal Trust III - Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF vs Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
SIRI leads
SIRI leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from GRNY.
Fragile: 2 of 4 evidence groups support SIRI, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Tidal Trust III - Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SIRI over GRNY, 59 versus 49 as of Oct 21, 2026. SIRI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while GRNY holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SIRI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SIRI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. SIRI lead: Reversed — GRNY led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SIRI now leads by 10.
Compare Tidal Trust III - Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and Sirius XM Holdings Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare GRNY and SIRI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value36 vs 66SIRI +30
- Momentum41 vs 65SIRI +24
- Risk Resilience73 vs 58GRNY +15
- Quality58 vs 46GRNY +12
2 of 4 evidence groups favor SIRI. SIRI’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; GRNY keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
SIRI's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — GRNY and SIRI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SIRI (Sirius XM Holdings Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
GRNY (Tidal Trust III - Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF): the counter-case, on risk resilience, quality.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SIRISIRI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
SIRISIRI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points.
Momentum
SIRISIRI on the Momentum factor, by 24 points.
Lower downside
GRNYGRNY on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | GRNY | SIRI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +24.8% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +50.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SIRI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SIRI | 49 vs 59 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | SIRI | Value 36 vs 66 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -0.8% vs -2.5%; vs 200-day 3% vs 4.6% |
| Risk Resilience | GRNY | Risk Resilience 73 vs 58 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of GRNY and SIRI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- Only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SIRI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SIRI lead: Reversed — GRNY led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SIRI now leads by 10.
- Today
- SIRI +10
- 49 vs 59
- 7 sessions ago
- SIRI +9
- 49 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- GRNY +6
- 55 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- GRNY +4
- 54 vs 50
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Sep 17 when GRNY moved ahead of SIRI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only GRNY
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only SIRI
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active.
GRNY is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.28%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.74%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1GRNY closes the Value gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to SIRI's edge.
- 2GRNY's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3SIRI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | GRNY | SIRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 3.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | -2.7% |
| Gross margin | — | 46.2% |
| Operating margin | — | 19.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 7.5% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.79 |
Performance
SIRI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | GRNY | SIRI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.1% | 2.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.1% | 2.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.5% | -9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.9% | 3.7% |
| Year to date | 10.4% | 35.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 8.9% | 27.4% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | GRNY | SIRI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 42.2 | 68.8 |
| ADX (14) | 18.9 | 21.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.8% | -2.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 3% | 4.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13.7% | 20.3% |
Risk
GRNY is the more resilient| Metric | GRNY | SIRI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.28 | 0.27 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.35 | 0.77 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.54 | 1.35 |
| Max drawdown | -11.6% | -21.3% |
| Current drawdown | -4.9% | -16.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.9% | 33.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.9% | -2.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, GRNY or SIRI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SIRI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 59 against GRNY's 49. The edge comes from value and momentum. GRNY is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is GRNY or SIRI the better buy right now?
SIRI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SIRI over GRNY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SIRI leads Value by 30 points; SIRI leads Momentum by 24 points; GRNY leads Risk Resilience by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, GRNY or SIRI?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for GRNY and +24.8% for SIRI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, GRNY or SIRI?
SIRI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SIRI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, GRNY or SIRI?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, GRNY or SIRI?
SIRI on the Momentum factor, by 24 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, GRNY or SIRI?
GRNY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. GRNY on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is GRNY more profitable than SIRI?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is SIRI's lead over GRNY getting stronger or weaker?
SIRI lead: Reversed — GRNY led by 6 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SIRI now leads by 10. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-17, when GRNY moved ahead of SIRI.
What would change the GRNY vs SIRI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: GRNY closes the Value gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to SIRI's edge; GRNY's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; SIRI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about GRNY and SIRI?
GRNY: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SIRI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on GRNY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SIRI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.