IPGP vs JPM Stock Comparison
JPM currently leads IPGP in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 52 vs 44. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between IPGP and JPM?
JPM leads the current stock comparison as JPMorgan Chase & Co., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
IPG Photonics Corporation vs JPMorgan Chase & Co.
JPM leads
JPM leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum. Wall Street currently favors IPGP on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support JPM.
IPG Photonics Corporation
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JPM over IPGP, 52 versus 44 as of Oct 21, 2026. JPM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum. JPM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors IPGP. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JPM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree.
Compare IPG Photonics Corporation and JPMorgan Chase & Co. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare IPGP and JPM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum28 vs 58JPM +30
- Value41 vs 44Even
- Quality48 vs 46Even
- Risk Resilience66 vs 68Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor JPM. JPM’s edge is concentrated in momentum.
The central trade-off
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
IPGP (IPG Photonics Corporation): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 38.8% against 14.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JPMJPM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
IPGPIPGP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
JPMJPM on the Momentum factor, by 30 points.
Lower downside
JPMJPM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
IPGPIPGP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors JPM, analyst targets favor IPGP. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | IPGP | JPM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +71.6% | +11.3% | IPGP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.3% | +32.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JPM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JPM | 44 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 4.9% vs -7.6%; EPS growth 200% vs -27.6%; TTM ROE 1.3% vs 17.9%; gross margin 38.4% vs 63.2% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 41 vs 44 |
| Technicals | JPM | Price vs 50-day -5% vs -3.4%; vs 200-day -28.5% vs 4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 66 vs 68 |
| Analyst expectations | IPGP | Target upside 71.6% vs 11.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of IPGP and JPM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JPM.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1IPGP closes the Momentum gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge.
- 2IPGP generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3JPM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | IPGP | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.9% | -7.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 200% | -27.6% |
| Gross margin | 38.4% | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | 0.7% | 28.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 1.3% | 17.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 3.32 |
Performance
JPM leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | IPGP | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.4% | 1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.3% | -1.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -25.9% | -3.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -41.5% | 7.1% |
| Year to date | 1.2% | 4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -16% | 12.3% |
Technicals
JPM has the stronger structure| Metric | IPGP | JPM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.7 | 57.4 |
| ADX (14) | 16.4 | 20.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5% | -3.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -28.5% | 4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 38.8% | 14.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, IPGP or JPM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JPM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 52 against IPGP's 44. The edge comes from momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is IPGP or JPM the better buy right now?
JPM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JPM over IPGP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JPM leads Momentum by 30 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, IPGP or JPM?
Analyst price targets imply +71.6% upside for IPGP and +11.3% for JPM, so the Street currently favors IPGP. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors JPM. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, IPGP or JPM?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, IPGP or JPM?
IPGP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, IPGP or JPM?
JPM on the Momentum factor, by 30 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, IPGP or JPM?
JPM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JPM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is IPGP more profitable than JPM?
JPM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.4% vs 63.2%; operating margin 0.7% vs 28.2%; ttm roe 1.3% vs 17.9%.
What would change the IPGP vs JPM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: IPGP closes the Momentum gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge; IPGP generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; JPM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare IPGP and JPM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.