IQ vs NFLX Stock Comparison
NFLX currently leads IQ in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 48 vs 36. The clearest difference is quality, while IQ has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between IQ and NFLX?
NFLX leads the current stock comparison as Netflix, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
iQIYI, Inc. vs Netflix, Inc.
NFLX leads
NFLX leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors IQ on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support NFLX, and its current signal state is conflicted.
iQIYI, Inc.
Netflix, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NFLX over IQ, 48 versus 36 as of Oct 31, 2026. NFLX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while IQ holds the stronger value profile. NFLX also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors IQ. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NFLX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. NFLX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare iQIYI, Inc. and Netflix, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare IQ and NFLX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality21 vs 85NFLX +64
- Value65 vs 33IQ +32
- Risk Resilience27 vs 44NFLX +17
- Momentum25 vs 23Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor NFLX. NFLX’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; IQ keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 8 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
NFLX's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — IQ and NFLX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
IQ (iQIYI, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NFLXNFLX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NFLXNFLX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
IQIQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
NFLXNFLX on Risk Resilience, by 17 points.
Analyst upside
IQIQ on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors NFLX, analyst targets favor IQ. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | IQ | NFLX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +69.6% | +41.5% | IQ has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +95.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 24 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NFLX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NFLX | 36 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | NFLX | revenue growth 0.7% vs 2.5%; EPS growth 1.6% vs 9.9%; TTM ROE -6.4% vs 50.4%; gross margin 17.9% vs 50.7%; operating margin -1.5% vs 31.3% |
| Valuation | IQ | Value 65 vs 33 |
| Technicals | NFLX | Price vs 50-day -15.3% vs -15.4%; vs 200-day -34.1% vs -24.3% |
| Risk Resilience | NFLX | Risk Resilience 27 vs 44 |
| Analyst expectations | IQ | Target upside 69.6% vs 41.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of IQ and NFLX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NFLX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28NFLX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NFLX +12
- 36 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- NFLX +14
- 36 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- NFLX +11
- 37 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- NFLX +25
- 35 vs 60
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only IQ
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.63%)
2 bullish / 5 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 7 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, BB Lower Band Breach, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, 52-Week Low Proximity, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bearish Crossover.
NFLX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.83%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.05%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1IQ closes the Quality gap — currently 64 points behind, the largest single contributor to NFLX's edge.
- 2IQ's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3NFLX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NFLX leads on balance| Metric | IQ | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.7% | 2.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 1.6% | 9.9% |
| Gross margin | 17.9% | 50.7% |
| Operating margin | -1.5% | 31.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -6.4% | 50.4% |
| Debt to equity | 1.12 | 0.52 |
Performance
NFLX leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | IQ | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -9.1% | -4.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -16.6% | -10.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -34.9% | -15.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -28.1% | -32.7% |
| Year to date | -54.3% | -30.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -61.8% | -43.4% |
Technicals
NFLX has the stronger structure| Metric | IQ | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 19.7 | 24.1 |
| ADX (14) | 19.4 | 28.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -15.3% | -15.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -34.1% | -24.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 37.9% | 35.1% |
Risk
NFLX is the more resilient| Metric | IQ | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.22 | 0.21 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.81 | -1.54 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.97 | -2.26 |
| Max drawdown | -64.5% | -46.4% |
| Current drawdown | -64.5% | -46.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 50.5% | 35.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.1% | -3.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, IQ or NFLX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NFLX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 48 against IQ's 36. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. IQ is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is IQ or NFLX the better buy right now?
NFLX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NFLX over IQ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NFLX leads Quality by 64 points; IQ leads Value by 32 points; NFLX leads Risk Resilience by 17 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, IQ or NFLX?
Analyst price targets imply +69.6% upside for IQ and +41.5% for NFLX, so the Street currently favors IQ. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors NFLX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, IQ or NFLX?
IQ is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. IQ on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, IQ or NFLX?
NFLX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, IQ or NFLX?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, IQ or NFLX?
NFLX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NFLX on Risk Resilience, by 17 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is IQ more profitable than NFLX?
NFLX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 17.9% vs 50.7%; operating margin -1.5% vs 31.3%; ttm roe -6.4% vs 50.4%.
Is NFLX's lead over IQ getting stronger or weaker?
NFLX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the IQ vs NFLX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: IQ closes the Quality gap — currently 64 points behind, the largest single contributor to NFLX's edge; IQ's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; NFLX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 5 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about IQ and NFLX?
IQ: 2 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. NFLX: 2 bullish / 5 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on IQ is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On NFLX it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare IQ and NFLX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.