JPM vs KRC Stock Comparison
KRC currently leads JPM in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 55 vs 52. The clearest difference is value, while JPM has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between JPM and KRC?
KRC leads the current stock comparison as Kilroy Realty Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
JPMorgan Chase & Co. vs Kilroy Realty Corporation
KRC leads
KRC leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support KRC, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Kilroy Realty Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors KRC over JPM, 55 versus 52 as of Oct 21, 2026. KRC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while JPM holds the stronger risk resilience profile. KRC also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KRC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. KRC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Kilroy Realty Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JPM and KRC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value44 vs 67KRC +23
- Risk Resilience68 vs 52JPM +16
- Quality46 vs 42JPM +4
- Momentum58 vs 58Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor KRC. KRC’s edge is concentrated in value; JPM keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +15
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
KRC's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JPM and KRC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
KRC (Kilroy Realty Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, quality, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
KRCKRC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
KRCKRC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
KRCKRC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 23 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
JPMJPM on Risk Resilience, by 16 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JPM | KRC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +11.3% | +10.4% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +32.2% | +34.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | JPM | KRC |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 9.04% | 1.86% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $3.600 | $1.970 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $5.550 | $2.160 |
| Years increased | 5 | 3 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #120 | #26 |
JPM grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 9.04% a year against KRC's 1.86%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window. They are ranked in different cohorts — US dividend-paying corporations and REITs — so their ranks are not comparable with each other.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KRC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 52 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | JPMon balance | EPS growth -27.6% vs 206.3%; TTM ROE 17.9% vs 3.2%; gross margin 63.2% vs 48.7%; operating margin 28.2% vs 25.1% — JPM takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | KRC | Value 44 vs 67 |
| Technicals | JPM | Price vs 50-day -3.4% vs -2.2%; vs 200-day 4% vs 0.6% |
| Risk Resilience | JPM | Risk Resilience 68 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 11.3% vs 10.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JPM and KRC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on KRC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20KRC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- KRC +3
- 52 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- KRC +5
- 47 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- KRC +5
- 43 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- JPM +4
- 53 vs 49
The lead changed hands 8 times in this window, most recently on Sep 16 when KRC moved ahead of JPM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
No signal that the other name lacks.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only KRC
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.02%, AIQ +3 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.12%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1JPM closes the Value gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to KRC's edge.
- 2JPM generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3KRC's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JPM leads on balance| Metric | JPM | KRC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -7.6% | 0.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -27.6% | 206.3% |
| Gross margin | 63.2% | 48.7% |
| Operating margin | 28.2% | 25.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.9% | 3.2% |
| Debt to equity | 3.32 | 0.89 |
Performance
JPM leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | JPM | KRC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.2% | -0.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.4% | 0.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.7% | -9.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 7.1% | 9.4% |
| Year to date | 4% | -6.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 12.3% | -13.9% |
Technicals
JPM has the stronger structure| Metric | JPM | KRC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.4 | 60.8 |
| ADX (14) | 20.5 | 22.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.4% | -2.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 4% | 0.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.8% | 29.6% |
Risk
JPM is the more resilient| Metric | JPM | KRC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.75 | 0.65 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.47 | -0.51 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.66 | -0.76 |
| Max drawdown | -15.5% | -36.3% |
| Current drawdown | -8.2% | -19.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 22.2% | 28.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.4% | -2.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JPM or KRC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, KRC is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 55 against JPM's 52. The edge comes from value. JPM is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JPM or KRC the better buy right now?
KRC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor KRC over JPM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. KRC leads Value by 23 points; JPM leads Risk Resilience by 16 points; JPM leads Quality by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JPM or KRC?
Analyst price targets imply +11.3% upside for JPM and +10.4% for KRC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JPM or KRC?
KRC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. KRC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 23 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JPM or KRC?
KRC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JPM or KRC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JPM or KRC?
JPM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JPM on Risk Resilience, by 16 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JPM more profitable than KRC?
JPM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 63.2% vs 48.7%; operating margin 28.2% vs 25.1%; ttm roe 17.9% vs 3.2%.
Is KRC's lead over JPM getting stronger or weaker?
KRC lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 8 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-16, when KRC moved ahead of JPM.
What would change the JPM vs KRC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: JPM closes the Value gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to KRC's edge; JPM generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; KRC's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about JPM and KRC?
JPM: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. KRC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on JPM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On KRC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare JPM and KRC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.