JPM vs RCL Stock Comparison
RCL currently leads JPM in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 55 vs 52. The clearest difference is momentum, while JPM has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between JPM and RCL?
RCL leads the current stock comparison as Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
JPMorgan Chase & Co. vs Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
RCL leads
RCL leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Quality.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support RCL, and its current signal state is conflicted.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors RCL over JPM, 55 versus 52 as of Oct 22, 2026. RCL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and quality, while JPM holds the stronger risk resilience profile. RCL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RCL today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. RCL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JPM and RCL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience68 vs 26JPM +42
- Momentum58 vs 82RCL +24
- Quality46 vs 61RCL +15
- Value44 vs 42Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor RCL. RCL’s edge is concentrated in momentum and quality; JPM keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
RCL's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JPM and RCL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
RCL (Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and quality.
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
RCLRCL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
RCLRCL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
RCLRCL on the Momentum factor, by 24 points.
Lower downside
JPMJPM on Risk Resilience, by 42 points.
Analyst upside
RCLRCL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JPM | RCL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +11.3% | +18.4% | RCL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.2% | +39.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 12 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | JPM | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 9.04% | 35.02% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $3.600 | $0.780 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $5.550 | $3.500 |
| Years increased | 5 | — |
| No cut in window | Yes | — |
| Cohort rank | #120 | not ranked |
RCL grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 35.02% a year against JPM's 9.04%.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RCL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 52 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | RCLon balance | revenue growth -7.6% vs 8.5%; EPS growth -27.6% vs 20.6%; TTM ROE 17.9% vs 43.8%; gross margin 63.2% vs 46.6%; operating margin 28.2% vs 27.3% — RCL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 44 vs 42 |
| Technicals | RCL | Price vs 50-day -3.4% vs 5.5%; vs 200-day 4% vs 0.4% |
| Risk Resilience | JPM | Risk Resilience 68 vs 26 |
| Analyst expectations | RCL | Target upside 11.3% vs 18.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JPM and RCL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on RCL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20RCL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- RCL +3
- 52 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- RCL +7
- 47 vs 54
- 30 sessions ago
- RCL +3
- 43 vs 46
- 90 sessions ago
- JPM +12
- 53 vs 41
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 29 when RCL moved ahead of JPM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
Only JPM
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.65%)
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only RCL
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (4.83%)
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
RCL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.02%, AIQ +3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.22%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1JPM closes the Momentum gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to RCL's edge.
- 2JPM generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3RCL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
RCL leads on balance| Metric | JPM | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -7.6% | 8.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -27.6% | 20.6% |
| Gross margin | 63.2% | 46.6% |
| Operating margin | 28.2% | 27.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.9% | 43.8% |
| Debt to equity | 3.32 | 2.3 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | JPM | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.2% | 2.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.4% | 22.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.7% | 0.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 7.1% | 6% |
| Year to date | 4% | 3.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 12.3% | -3.6% |
Technicals
RCL has the stronger structure| Metric | JPM | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.4 | 67.1 |
| ADX (14) | 20.5 | 22.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.4% | 5.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 4% | 0.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.8% | 39.6% |
Risk
JPM is the more resilient| Metric | JPM | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.75 | 1.61 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.47 | 0.06 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.66 | 0.12 |
| Max drawdown | -15.5% | -33.8% |
| Current drawdown | -8.2% | -17.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 22.2% | 48% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.4% | -4.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JPM or RCL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, RCL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 55 against JPM's 52. The edge comes from momentum and quality. JPM is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JPM or RCL the better buy right now?
RCL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor RCL over JPM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JPM leads Risk Resilience by 42 points; RCL leads Momentum by 24 points; RCL leads Quality by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JPM or RCL?
Analyst price targets imply +11.3% upside for JPM and +18.4% for RCL, so the Street currently favors RCL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JPM or RCL?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JPM or RCL?
RCL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JPM or RCL?
RCL on the Momentum factor, by 24 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JPM or RCL?
JPM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JPM on Risk Resilience, by 42 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JPM more profitable than RCL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 63.2% vs 46.6%; operating margin 28.2% vs 27.3%; ttm roe 17.9% vs 43.8%. JPM leads on two measures and RCL on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is RCL's lead over JPM getting stronger or weaker?
RCL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-29, when RCL moved ahead of JPM.
What would change the JPM vs RCL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: JPM closes the Momentum gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to RCL's edge; JPM generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; RCL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about JPM and RCL?
JPM: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. RCL: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on JPM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On RCL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare JPM and RCL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.