MKTX vs QQQ Stock Comparison
Compare MKTX and QQQ across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between MKTX and QQQ?
MKTX leads the current stock comparison as MarketAxess Holdings Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
MKTX leads
MKTX leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from QQQ.
Fragile: 3 of 4 evidence groups support MKTX, and the lead recently changed hands.
MarketAxess Holdings Inc.
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MKTX over QQQ, 65 versus 56 as of Sep 11, 2026. MKTX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. MKTX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor MKTX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. MKTX lead: Reversed — QQQ led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MKTX now leads by 9.
Compare MarketAxess Holdings Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare MKTX and QQQ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum74 vs 45MKTX +29
- Risk Resilience86 vs 75MKTX +11
- Value28 vs 30Even
- Quality83 vs 83Even
3 of 4 evidence groups favor MKTX. MKTX’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -17
No new signals fired.
MKTX's lead widened by 5 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MKTX and QQQ both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MKTXMKTX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
MKTXMKTX on the Momentum factor, by 29 points.
Lower downside
MKTXMKTX on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MKTX | QQQ | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -3.6% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | +55.3% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | — | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | — | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor MKTX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | MKTX | 65 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Even | Value 28 vs 30 |
| Technicals | MKTX | Price vs 50-day 13.2% vs 0.6%; vs 200-day 3.9% vs 7.5% |
| Risk Resilience | MKTX | Risk Resilience 86 vs 75 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MKTX and QQQ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MKTX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10MKTX lead: Reversed — QQQ led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MKTX now leads by 9.
- Today
- MKTX +9
- 65 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- MKTX +5
- 64 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- QQQ +9
- 55 vs 64
- 90 sessions ago
- MKTX +4
- 54 vs 50
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Aug 24 when MKTX moved ahead of QQQ.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (9.01%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.75%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.27%)
QQQ is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.06%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 5 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.87%, AIQ -5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1QQQ closes the Momentum gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to MKTX's edge.
- 2QQQ's ATR Contraction - Coiling turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3MKTX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | MKTX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -6.4% | — |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -12.7% | — |
| Gross margin | 67.5% | — |
| Operating margin | 40.5% | — |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 24.7% | — |
| Debt to equity | 0.14 | — |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | MKTX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.2% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.3% | -2.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 39.9% | 2.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -8.9% | 16.6% |
| Year to date | -10% | 15.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -12.9% | 22.4% |
Technicals
MKTX has the stronger structure| Metric | MKTX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 78.7 | 48.1 |
| ADX (14) | 67.8 | 9.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 13.2% | 0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 3.9% | 7.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 2.5% | 13% |
Risk
MKTX is the more resilient| Metric | MKTX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.08 | 1.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.28 | 0.92 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.59 | 1.38 |
| Max drawdown | -43.6% | -12.2% |
| Current drawdown | -15.8% | -5% |
| Annualized volatility | 39.9% | 19.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MKTX or QQQ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MKTX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 65 against QQQ's 56. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MKTX or QQQ the better buy right now?
MKTX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MKTX over QQQ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MKTX leads Momentum by 29 points; MKTX leads Risk Resilience by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MKTX or QQQ?
Analyst price targets imply -3.6% upside for MKTX and not covered for QQQ. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MKTX or QQQ?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MKTX or QQQ?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MKTX or QQQ?
MKTX on the Momentum factor, by 29 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MKTX or QQQ?
MKTX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MKTX on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MKTX more profitable than QQQ?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is MKTX's lead over QQQ getting stronger or weaker?
MKTX lead: Reversed — QQQ led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MKTX now leads by 9. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-24, when MKTX moved ahead of QQQ.
What would change the MKTX vs QQQ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: QQQ closes the Momentum gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to MKTX's edge; QQQ's ATR Contraction - Coiling turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; MKTX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MKTX and QQQ?
MKTX: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral. QQQ: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on MKTX is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On QQQ it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.