AVGO vs NXPI Stock Comparison
Compare AVGO and NXPI across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AVGO and NXPI?
NXPI leads the current stock comparison as NXP Semiconductors N.V., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Broadcom Inc. vs NXP Semiconductors N.V.
NXPI leads
NXPI leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors AVGO on target upside.
Competitive: 2 of 6 evidence groups support NXPI, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Broadcom Inc.
NXP Semiconductors N.V.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NXPI over AVGO, 61 versus 52 as of Sep 11, 2026. NXPI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while AVGO holds the stronger quality profile. NXPI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AVGO. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NXPI today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. NXPI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Broadcom Inc. and NXP Semiconductors N.V. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AVGO and NXPI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30 vs 66NXPI +36
- Quality85 vs 69AVGO +16
- Momentum39 vs 51NXPI +12
- Risk Resilience52 vs 50Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor NXPI. NXPI’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; AVGO keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -3
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No new signals fired.
NXPI's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AVGO and NXPI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NXPI (NXP Semiconductors N.V.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 37.6% against 21.1%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NXPINXPI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AVGOAVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NXPINXPI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 36 points.
Momentum
NXPINXPI on the Momentum factor, by 12 points.
Lower downside
NXPINXPI carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
AVGOAVGO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors NXPI, analyst targets favor AVGO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AVGO | NXPI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +39.4% | +14.2% | AVGO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +49.5% | +55.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 17 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NXPI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NXPI | 52 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | AVGO | revenue growth 14.9% vs 9.9%; EPS growth 26.5% vs -31.5%; TTM ROE 36.4% vs 28%; gross margin 67% vs 55.9%; operating margin 43.7% vs 28.7% |
| Valuation | NXPI | Value 30 vs 66 |
| Technicals | AVGO | Price vs 50-day -5.5% vs -4.2%; vs 200-day -2.5% vs -7.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 52 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | AVGO | Target upside 39.4% vs 14.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AVGO and NXPI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NXPI.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10NXPI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NXPI +9
- 52 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- NXPI +12
- 47 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- NXPI +9
- 45 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 50 vs 50
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Aug 18 when NXPI moved ahead of AVGO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.55%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.13%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
AVGO is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.32%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +4.48%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AVGO closes the Value gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to NXPI's edge.
- 2AVGO's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3NXPI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AVGO leads on balance| Metric | AVGO | NXPI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.9% | 9.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 26.5% | -31.5% |
| Gross margin | 67% | 55.9% |
| Operating margin | 43.7% | 28.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 36.4% | 28% |
| Debt to equity | 0.74 | 0.96 |
Performance
NXPI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AVGO | NXPI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.7% | -0.9% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.3% | -3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3% | -20.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 5.6% | 13.3% |
| Year to date | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 6.9% | 0.4% |
Technicals
AVGO has the stronger structure| Metric | AVGO | NXPI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 47.7 | 54.6 |
| ADX (14) | 23.4 | 29.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.5% | -4.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -2.5% | -7.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 37.6% | 21.1% |
Risk
Split| Metric | AVGO | NXPI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.16 | 1.73 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.3 | 0.18 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.44 | 0.33 |
| Max drawdown | -28.9% | -33.1% |
| Current drawdown | -25.1% | -31.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 47.5% | 48.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.4% | -4.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AVGO or NXPI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NXPI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 61 against AVGO's 52. The edge comes from value and momentum. AVGO is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AVGO or NXPI the better buy right now?
NXPI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NXPI over AVGO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. NXPI leads Value by 36 points; AVGO leads Quality by 16 points; NXPI leads Momentum by 12 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AVGO or NXPI?
Analyst price targets imply +39.4% upside for AVGO and +14.2% for NXPI, so the Street currently favors AVGO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors NXPI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AVGO or NXPI?
NXPI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NXPI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 36 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AVGO or NXPI?
AVGO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AVGO or NXPI?
NXPI on the Momentum factor, by 12 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AVGO or NXPI?
NXPI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NXPI carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AVGO more profitable than NXPI?
AVGO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 67% vs 55.9%; operating margin 43.7% vs 28.7%; ttm roe 36.4% vs 28%.
Is NXPI's lead over AVGO getting stronger or weaker?
NXPI lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-18, when NXPI moved ahead of AVGO.
What would change the AVGO vs NXPI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AVGO closes the Value gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to NXPI's edge; AVGO's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; NXPI's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AVGO and NXPI?
AVGO: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. NXPI: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AVGO is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On NXPI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AVGO and NXPI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.