ODFL vs UBER Stock Comparison
UBER currently leads ODFL in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 61. The clearest difference is value, while ODFL has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between ODFL and UBER?
UBER leads the current stock comparison as Uber Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. vs Uber Technologies, Inc.
UBER leads
UBER leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support UBER, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Uber Technologies, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors UBER over ODFL, 64 versus 61 as of Oct 21, 2026. UBER's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while ODFL holds the stronger momentum profile. UBER also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UBER today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. UBER lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ODFL and UBER against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value32 vs 70UBER +38
- Momentum78 vs 44ODFL +34
- Risk Resilience72 vs 59ODFL +13
- Quality69 vs 77UBER +8
2 of 6 evidence groups favor UBER. UBER’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; ODFL keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +17
New signals
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
UBER's lead narrowed by 5 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ODFL and UBER both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
ODFL (Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
UBERUBER on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ODFLODFL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
UBERUBER on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points.
Momentum
ODFLODFL on the Momentum factor, by 34 points.
Lower downside
ODFLODFL on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
UBERUBER on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ODFL | UBER | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +21.8% | +54.3% | UBER has more room |
| Target dispersion | +27.4% | +72.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 15 | 18 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor UBER. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 61 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | ODFLon balance | revenue growth 16.4% vs 7.5%; EPS growth 47.4% vs 8.1%; TTM ROE 24.9% vs 35.7%; gross margin 31.7% vs 42.3%; operating margin 25.8% vs 12.5% — ODFL takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | UBER | Value 32 vs 70 |
| Technicals | ODFL | Price vs 50-day 0.4% vs -7.1%; vs 200-day -6.4% vs -6.9% |
| Risk Resilience | ODFL | Risk Resilience 72 vs 59 |
| Analyst expectations | UBER | Target upside 21.8% vs 54.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ODFL and UBER and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on UBER.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20UBER lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- UBER +3
- 61 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- UBER +8
- 57 vs 65
- 30 sessions ago
- UBER +11
- 50 vs 61
- 90 sessions ago
- UBER +18
- 49 vs 67
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jul 17 when ODFL moved ahead of UBER.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only ODFL
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only UBER
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
UBER leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.3%, AIQ +5 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.91%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ODFL closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to UBER's edge.
- 2ODFL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3UBER's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate UBER's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ODFL leads on balance| Metric | ODFL | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 16.4% | 7.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 47.4% | 8.1% |
| Gross margin | 31.7% | 42.3% |
| Operating margin | 25.8% | 12.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 24.9% | 35.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0 | 0.54 |
Performance
ODFL leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | ODFL | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.8% | -3.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 6.2% | -1.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -19.1% | -2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -15.5% | -10.8% |
| Year to date | 20.1% | -15.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 36.4% | -25.5% |
Technicals
ODFL has the stronger structure| Metric | ODFL | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 75.5 | 51.7 |
| ADX (14) | 30.3 | 17 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.4% | -7.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -6.4% | -6.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 23.3% | 24.8% |
Risk
ODFL is the more resilient| Metric | ODFL | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.93 | 0.86 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.91 | -0.77 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.4 | -1.26 |
| Max drawdown | -30.4% | -33.9% |
| Current drawdown | -24.3% | -30.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.7% | 35.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -3.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ODFL or UBER?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, UBER is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 64 against ODFL's 61. The edge comes from value and quality. ODFL is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ODFL or UBER the better buy right now?
UBER carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor UBER over ODFL?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. UBER leads Value by 38 points; ODFL leads Momentum by 34 points; ODFL leads Risk Resilience by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ODFL or UBER?
Analyst price targets imply +21.8% upside for ODFL and +54.3% for UBER, so the Street currently favors UBER. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ODFL or UBER?
UBER is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. UBER on the peer-relative Value factor, by 38 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ODFL or UBER?
ODFL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ODFL or UBER?
ODFL on the Momentum factor, by 34 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ODFL or UBER?
ODFL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ODFL on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ODFL more profitable than UBER?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 31.7% vs 42.3%; operating margin 25.8% vs 12.5%; ttm roe 24.9% vs 35.7%. ODFL leads on one measure and UBER on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is UBER's lead over ODFL getting stronger or weaker?
UBER lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-07-17, when ODFL moved ahead of UBER.
What would change the ODFL vs UBER verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ODFL closes the Value gap — currently 38 points behind, the largest single contributor to UBER's edge; ODFL's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; UBER's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate UBER's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about ODFL and UBER?
ODFL: 1 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. UBER: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ODFL is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On UBER it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare ODFL and UBER with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.