PANW vs MDB Stock Comparison
MDB currently leads PANW in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 46 vs 36. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between PANW and MDB?
MDB leads the current stock comparison as MongoDB, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. vs MongoDB, Inc.
MDB leads
MDB leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from PANW.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support MDB, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
MongoDB, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors MDB over PANW, 46 versus 36 as of Oct 21, 2026. MDB's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. MDB also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MDB today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. MDB lead: Reversed — PANW led by 15 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MDB now leads by 10.
Compare Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and MongoDB, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare PANW and MDB against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum16 vs 52MDB +36
- Risk Resilience44 vs 49MDB +5
- Quality60 vs 62Even
- Value24 vs 25Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor MDB. MDB’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
MDB's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PANW and MDB both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
MDB (MongoDB, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
MDBMDB on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MDBMDB on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
MDBMDB on the Momentum factor, by 36 points.
Lower downside
MDBMDB on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
MDBMDB on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | PANW | MDB | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +4% | +15.7% | MDB has more room |
| Target dispersion | +85.6% | +54.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 37 | 21 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor MDB. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | MDB | 36 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | MDBon balance | revenue growth 15.7% vs -1.1%; EPS growth -147.5% vs -70.9%; TTM ROE 1.7% vs 2%; gross margin 70.4% vs 72.7% — MDB takes 2 of 3 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 24 vs 25 |
| Technicals | PANW | Price vs 50-day -6.7% vs -0.6%; vs 200-day 29.7% vs 8% |
| Risk Resilience | MDB | Risk Resilience 44 vs 49 |
| Analyst expectations | MDB | Target upside 4% vs 15.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PANW and MDB and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on MDB.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20MDB lead: Reversed — PANW led by 15 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MDB now leads by 10.
- Today
- MDB +10
- 36 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- MDB +3
- 40 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- PANW +15
- 54 vs 39
- 90 sessions ago
- MDB +1
- 55 vs 56
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Oct 15 when MDB moved ahead of PANW.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only PANW
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
MDB leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.05%, AIQ -1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +6.71%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PANW closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to MDB's edge.
- 2PANW's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3MDB's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MDB leads on balance| Metric | PANW | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 15.7% | -1.1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -147.5% | -70.9% |
| Gross margin | 70.4% | 72.7% |
| Operating margin | 6% | -0.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 1.7% | 2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.09 | 0.01 |
Performance
PANW leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | PANW | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -14.1% | -1.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.2% | -14.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 1.5% | 20.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 94.5% | 40.1% |
| Year to date | 84.7% | -12.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 65.6% | 16.5% |
Technicals
PANW has the stronger structure| Metric | PANW | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 31.6 | 56.5 |
| ADX (14) | 19.8 | 13.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.7% | -0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 29.7% | 8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 55.5% | 82.4% |
Risk
MDB is the more resilient| Metric | PANW | MDB |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.29 | 1.82 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.17 | 0.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.91 | 0.68 |
| Max drawdown | -36% | -48.7% |
| Current drawdown | -19% | -22.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 49.1% | 71.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.7% | -6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PANW or MDB?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, MDB is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 46 against PANW's 36. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PANW or MDB the better buy right now?
MDB carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor MDB over PANW?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MDB leads Momentum by 36 points; MDB leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PANW or MDB?
Analyst price targets imply +4% upside for PANW and +15.7% for MDB, so the Street currently favors MDB. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PANW or MDB?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PANW or MDB?
MDB on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PANW or MDB?
MDB on the Momentum factor, by 36 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PANW or MDB?
MDB is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. MDB on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PANW more profitable than MDB?
MDB leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 70.4% vs 72.7%; operating margin 6% vs -0.5%; ttm roe 1.7% vs 2%.
Is MDB's lead over PANW getting stronger or weaker?
MDB lead: Reversed — PANW led by 15 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; MDB now leads by 10. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-15, when MDB moved ahead of PANW.
What would change the PANW vs MDB verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PANW closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to MDB's edge; PANW's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; MDB's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PANW and MDB?
PANW: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. MDB: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PANW is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On MDB it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PANW and MDB with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.