QQQ vs QQQ: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
QQQ and QQQ are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. QQQ is Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, while QQQ is Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1.
| Metric | QQQ | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +19.6% | +19.6% |
| YTD return | +16.8% | +16.8% |
| 5Y annualized returnPrice return, distributions excluded | +13.9% | +13.9% |
| Risk | ||
| Max drawdown (5Y)Price return, distributions excluded | -35.6% | -35.6% |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 51/100 | 51/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 4/10 | 4/10 |
| Momentum | 21/100 | 21/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 72/100 | 72/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
QQQ and QQQ are effectively level
QQQ and QQQ are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate QQQ and QQQ as of Oct 21, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare QQQ and QQQ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality82 vs 82Even
- Value35 vs 35Even
- Momentum21 vs 21Even
- Risk Resilience72 vs 72Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
QQQ vs QQQ: five-year payout growth
QQQ and QQQ grew their split-adjusted payouts at the same rate over 2020-2025, 9.99% a year.
| Dividend metric | QQQ | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | 9.99% | 9.99% |
| 2020 annual payout | $1.737 | $1.737 |
| 2025 annual payout | $2.795 | $2.795 |
| Calendar-year declines | 2 | 2 |
| Peer rank | #56 of 138 | #56 of 138 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 51 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Even | Value 35 vs 35 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -0.2% vs -0.2%; vs 200-day 6.2% vs 6.2% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 72 vs 72 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | QQQ | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.5% | -3.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4% | -4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 11.4% | 11.4% |
| Year to date | 16.8% | 16.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 19.6% | 19.6% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | QQQ | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.2 | 37.2 |
| ADX (14) | 20.3 | 20.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.2% | -0.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 15.4% | 15.4% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
Their worst peak-to-trough falls over the past five years are similar: -35.6% for QQQ and -35.6% for QQQ.
Compare QQQ and QQQ with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.