RPM vs TSM Stock Comparison
RPM currently leads TSM in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 58 vs 57. The clearest difference is momentum, while TSM has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between RPM and TSM?
RPM leads the current stock comparison as RPM International Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
RPM International Inc. vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
RPM leads
RPM leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from TSM. Wall Street currently favors TSM on target upside.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support RPM, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
RPM International Inc.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors RPM over TSM, 58 versus 57 as of Oct 24, 2026. RPM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while TSM holds the stronger quality profile. RPM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TSM. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RPM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. RPM lead: Reversed — TSM led by 19 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RPM now leads by 1.
Compare RPM International Inc. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare RPM and TSM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality57 vs 98TSM +41
- Momentum52 vs 16RPM +36
- Value61 vs 45RPM +16
- Risk Resilience65 vs 65Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor RPM. RPM’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; TSM keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
RPM's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — RPM and TSM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
RPM (RPM International Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 33.5% against 25.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
RPMRPM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
RPMRPM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
RPMRPM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
RPMRPM on the Momentum factor, by 36 points.
Lower downside
RPMRPM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
TSMTSM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors RPM, analyst targets favor TSM. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | RPM | TSM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +30.6% | +40.7% | TSM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +34.1% | +34% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | RPM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 7.23% | 15.29% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $1.460 | $1.360 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $2.070 | $2.769 |
| Years increased | 5 | 4 |
| No cut in window | Yes | No (1) |
| Cohort rank | #178 | not ranked |
TSM grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 15.29% a year against RPM's 7.23%. RPM never reduced its regular dividend in the window; TSM did in 1 year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor RPM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 58 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | TSMon balance | revenue growth 38.8% vs 17.6%; EPS growth 3.2% vs 8%; TTM ROE 20.9% vs 41.2%; gross margin 41.4% vs 65.8%; operating margin 12.3% vs 57.9% — TSM takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | RPM | Value 61 vs 45 |
| Technicals | TSM | Price vs 50-day -3.1% vs -3.6%; vs 200-day -6.4% vs 5.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 65 vs 65 |
| Analyst expectations | TSM | Target upside 30.6% vs 40.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of RPM and TSM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on RPM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 24 – Oct 23RPM lead: Reversed — TSM led by 19 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RPM now leads by 1.
- Today
- RPM +1
- 58 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- TSM +2
- 56 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- TSM +19
- 55 vs 74
- 90 sessions ago
- TSM +5
- 59 vs 64
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Oct 22 when RPM moved ahead of TSM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only RPM
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.53%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only TSM
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.18%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
RPM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.93%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.49%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TSM closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to RPM's edge.
- 2TSM's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3RPM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TSM leads on balance| Metric | RPM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 38.8% | 17.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.2% | 8% |
| Gross margin | 41.4% | 65.8% |
| Operating margin | 12.3% | 57.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 20.9% | 41.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.87 | 0.14 |
Performance
TSM leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | RPM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1% | 1.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.7% | -7.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.4% | 4.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -5.9% | 7.8% |
| Year to date | -5.1% | 37.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -12.8% | 42.1% |
Technicals
TSM has the stronger structure| Metric | RPM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 60.9 | 26.2 |
| ADX (14) | 14.7 | 22.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -3.1% | -3.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -6.4% | 5.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 25.8% | 33.5% |
Risk
Split| Metric | RPM | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.95 | 2.12 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.4 | 1.05 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.75 | 1.66 |
| Max drawdown | -22.4% | -21.6% |
| Current drawdown | -17.8% | -13.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 30% | 39.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.9% | -4.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, RPM or TSM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, RPM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 24, 2026, scoring 58 against TSM's 57. The edge comes from momentum and value. TSM is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is RPM or TSM the better buy right now?
RPM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 24, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor RPM over TSM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TSM leads Quality by 41 points; RPM leads Momentum by 36 points; RPM leads Value by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, RPM or TSM?
Analyst price targets imply +30.6% upside for RPM and +40.7% for TSM, so the Street currently favors TSM. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors RPM. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, RPM or TSM?
RPM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. RPM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, RPM or TSM?
RPM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, RPM or TSM?
RPM on the Momentum factor, by 36 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, RPM or TSM?
RPM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. RPM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is RPM more profitable than TSM?
TSM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 41.4% vs 65.8%; operating margin 12.3% vs 57.9%; ttm roe 20.9% vs 41.2%.
Is RPM's lead over TSM getting stronger or weaker?
RPM lead: Reversed — TSM led by 19 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; RPM now leads by 1. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-24 and 2026-10-23. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-22, when RPM moved ahead of TSM.
What would change the RPM vs TSM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TSM closes the Momentum gap — currently 36 points behind, the largest single contributor to RPM's edge; TSM's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; RPM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about RPM and TSM?
RPM: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TSM: 2 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on RPM is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On TSM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare RPM and TSM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.