RVTY vs TSM Stock Comparison
Compare RVTY and TSM across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between RVTY and TSM?
TSM leads the current stock comparison as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Revvity, Inc. vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
TSM leads
TSM leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 14 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support TSM, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Revvity, Inc.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TSM over RVTY, 68 versus 57 as of Sep 5, 2026. TSM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while RVTY holds the stronger momentum profile. TSM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TSM today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. TSM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 11 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Revvity, Inc. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare RVTY and TSM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%50 vs 96TSM +46
- Momentum25%81 vs 63RVTY +18
- Risk Resilience15%64 vs 69TSM +5
- Value30%42 vs 42Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor TSM. TSM’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; RVTY keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +21
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
TSM's lead widened by 6 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — RVTY and TSM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
RVTY (Revvity, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TSMTSM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
RVTYRVTY on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
TSMTSM on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
TSMTSM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | RVTY | TSM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -13.4% | +35.1% | TSM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +26.6% | +38% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TSM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TSM | 57 vs 68 |
| Fundamentals | TSMon balance | revenue growth 2.6% vs 12%; EPS growth 30.6% vs 22.1%; TTM ROE 3.3% vs 39.3%; gross margin 52.1% vs 64.2%; operating margin 12.3% vs 56% — TSM takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 42 vs 42 |
| Technicals | RVTY | Price vs 50-day 11.9% vs 2%; vs 200-day 27.2% vs 15% |
| Risk Resilience | TSM | Risk Resilience 64 vs 69 |
| Analyst expectations | TSM | Target upside -13.4% vs 35.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of RVTY and TSM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TSM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4TSM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 11 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TSM +11
- 57 vs 68
- 7 sessions ago
- TSM +4
- 58 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- TSM +14
- 56 vs 70
- 90 sessions ago
- TSM +8
- 57 vs 65
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jul 13 when RVTY moved ahead of TSM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (13.71%)
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
4 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (12.76%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
RVTY is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.31%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +2.85%, AIQ +6 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1RVTY closes the Quality gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to TSM's edge.
- 2RVTY's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3TSM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 11-point move would eliminate TSM's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TSM leads on balance| Metric | RVTY | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.6% | 12% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 30.6% | 22.1% |
| Gross margin | 52.1% | 64.2% |
| Operating margin | 12.3% | 56% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 3.3% | 39.3% |
| Debt to equity | 0.46 | 0.15 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | RVTY | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.1% | 2.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 13.6% | 2.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 32.4% | 3.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 34.7% | 26.6% |
| Year to date | 34% | 41.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 51.9% | 85.4% |
Technicals
RVTY has the stronger structure| Metric | RVTY | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 73.4 | 48.7 |
| ADX (14) | 29.9 | 7.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 11.9% | 2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 27.2% | 15% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 30.5% | 25.9% |
Risk
TSM is the more resilient| Metric | RVTY | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.23 | 2.18 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.95 | 2.57 |
| Max drawdown | -30.1% | -21.6% |
| Current drawdown | -0.6% | -10.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.8% | 40.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -4.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, RVTY or TSM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TSM is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 68 against RVTY's 57. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. RVTY is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is RVTY or TSM the better buy right now?
TSM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TSM over RVTY?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. TSM leads Quality by 46 points; RVTY leads Momentum by 18 points; TSM leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, RVTY or TSM?
Analyst price targets imply -13.4% upside for RVTY and +35.1% for TSM, so the Street currently favors TSM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, RVTY or TSM?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, RVTY or TSM?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, RVTY or TSM?
RVTY on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, RVTY or TSM?
TSM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TSM on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is RVTY more profitable than TSM?
TSM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 52.1% vs 64.2%; operating margin 12.3% vs 56%; ttm roe 3.3% vs 39.3%.
Is TSM's lead over RVTY getting stronger or weaker?
TSM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 11 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-07-13, when RVTY moved ahead of TSM.
What would change the RVTY vs TSM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: RVTY closes the Quality gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to TSM's edge; RVTY's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; TSM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 11-point move would eliminate TSM's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about RVTY and TSM?
RVTY: 5 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. TSM: 4 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on RVTY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TSM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare RVTY and TSM with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.