SDIV vs SPHD: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
SDIV and SPHD are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. SDIV is Global X - SuperDividend ETF, while SPHD is Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF. SDIV is broader by holdings count, with 119 positions versus 54 for SPHD. SPHD is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has SPHD ahead on AIQ Score, 63 versus 59.
What is the main difference between SDIV and SPHD?
SDIV and SPHD have little in common: 0% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | SDIV | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.3% |
| Holdings | 119 | 54 |
| Top-10 concentration | 15% | 28.2% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 9.32% | 4.91% |
| Average volume | 420,613 | 895,996 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +3.2% | +5.1% |
| YTD return | -0.5% | +5.5% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +0.2% | +7.5% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 12.3% | 11.9% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -11.6% | -10.2% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -38.4% | -19.5% |
| Beta | 0.54 | 0.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.02 | 0.08 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.02 | 0.15 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 59/100 | 63/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Momentum | 52/100 | 59/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 72/100 | 66/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Global X - SuperDividend ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
SPHD leads
SPHD leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from SDIV.
Fragile: 2 of 3 evidence groups support SPHD, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Global X - SuperDividend ETF
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPHD over SDIV, 63 versus 59 as of Oct 21, 2026. SPHD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while SDIV holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SPHD also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor SPHD today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. SPHD lead: Reversed — SDIV led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SPHD now leads by 4.
Compare Global X - SuperDividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
SDIV vs SPHD: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | SDIV | SPHD | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.58% | 0.3% | SPHD |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 119 | 54 | SDIV |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 15% | 28.2% | SDIV |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 9.32% | 4.91% | SDIV |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -38.4% | -19.5% | SPHD |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 12.3% | 11.9% | Similar |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SDIV and SPHD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality48 vs 64SPHD +16
- Momentum52 vs 59SPHD +7
- Risk Resilience72 vs 66SDIV +6
2 of 3 evidence groups favor SPHD. SPHD’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; SDIV keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +12
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
SPHD's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SDIV and SPHD both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SPHD (Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
SDIV (Global X - SuperDividend ETF): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | SDIV | SPHD | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.3% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 119 | 54 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 420,613 | 895,996 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 12.3% | 11.9% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -11.6% | -10.2% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.02 | 0.08 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.54 | 0.06 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
How much of the same holdings they own
SDIV and SPHD share 0% of their weighted exposure across 0 common holdings.
97 holdings are unique to SDIV, and 51 holdings are unique to SPHD. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
SPHD is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 28.23% of the fund, against 15% for SDIV (54 holdings vs 119). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
What SDIV adds that SPHD doesn’t
| Holding | SDIV | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| TFG-R.BKTHAIFOODS GROUP PCL-NVDR | 1.75% | Not held |
| NATNORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS LTD | 1.62% | Not held |
| HAUTO.OLHOEGH AUTOLINERS ASA | 1.59% | Not held |
| VCT.LVICTREX PLC | 1.58% | Not held |
| VAR.OLVAR ENERGI ASA | 1.57% | Not held |
| ITH.LITHACA ENERGY PLC | 1.46% | Not held |
What SPHD adds that SDIV doesn’t
| Holding | SPHD | SDIV |
|---|---|---|
| VZVerizon Communications Inc | 3.4% | Not held |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 3.4% | Not held |
| GISGeneral Mills Inc | 2.97% | Not held |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co/The | 2.87% | Not held |
| VICIVICI Properties Inc | 2.84% | Not held |
| TAT&T Inc | 2.72% | Not held |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
SDIV vs SPHD: five-year payout growth
SPHD grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 0.98% a year against SDIV's -5.55%. SDIV: The 2020 payout was 33.8% below 2019, so the growth rate measures a recovery from a weak starting year.
| Dividend metric | SDIV | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | -5.55% | 0.98% |
| 2020 annual payout | $3.066 | $1.839 |
| 2025 annual payout | $2.305 | $1.931 |
| Calendar-year declines | 3 | 2 |
| Peer rank | #33 of 33 | #31 of 33 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor SPHD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SPHD | 59 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Not covered | Not covered |
| Technicals | SPHD | Price vs 50-day -1.9% vs -1.2%; vs 200-day -4.4% vs 0% |
| Risk Resilience | SDIV | Risk Resilience 72 vs 66 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SDIV and SPHD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPHD.
How the comparison changed
45 daily snapshots · Sep 6 – Oct 20SPHD lead: Reversed — SDIV led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SPHD now leads by 4.
- Today
- SPHD +4
- 59 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- SPHD +5
- 57 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- SDIV +2
- 53 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- Not covered
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Oct 14 when SPHD moved ahead of SDIV.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SDIV
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.88%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only SPHD
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (0.47%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Contraction - Coiling, MACD Bullish Crossover.
SPHD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.21%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.65%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SDIV closes the Quality gap — currently 16 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPHD's edge.
- 2SDIV's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SPHD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
SPHD leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SDIV | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.1% | 2.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.6% | 2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -4.5% | -3.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -7.9% | 2.5% |
| Year to date | -0.5% | 5.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 3.2% | 5.1% |
Technicals
SPHD has the stronger structure| Metric | SDIV | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 62.8 | 75.5 |
| ADX (14) | 27.3 | 31 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.9% | -1.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -4.4% | 0% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13.3% | 13% |
Risk
SDIV is the more resilient| Metric | SDIV | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.54 | 0.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.02 | 0.08 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.02 | 0.15 |
| Max drawdown | -11.6% | -10.2% |
| Current drawdown | -9.3% | -5.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 12.3% | 11.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.1% | -1.1% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between SDIV and SPHD?
SDIV and SPHD have little in common: 0% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do SDIV and SPHD overlap?
SDIV and SPHD share 0% of their weighted exposure across 0 common holdings. 97 holdings are unique to SDIV, and 51 holdings are unique to SPHD. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, SDIV or SPHD?
SDIV holds more positions: 119 versus 54 for SPHD.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
SPHD has the lower expense ratio, 0.3% a year against 0.58% for SDIV.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
SDIV, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 9.32% against 4.91% for SPHD.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
Their volatility over the past year is similar: 12.3% annualized for SDIV and 11.9% for SPHD.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
SPHD fell less from peak to trough over the past five years: -19.5% against -38.4% for SDIV.
Compare SDIV and SPHD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.