SDY vs SPHD: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
SDY and SPHD are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. SDY is State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF, while SPHD is Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF. SDY is broader by holdings count, with 158 positions versus 54 for SPHD. SPHD is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight.
What is the main difference between SDY and SPHD?
SDY and SPHD have little in common: 20% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | SDY | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.3% |
| Holdings | 158 | 54 |
| Top-10 concentration | 20.6% | 28.2% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 2.42% | 4.91% |
| Average volume | 208,470 | 895,996 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +12.9% | +5.1% |
| YTD return | +12.2% | +5.5% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +7.5% | +7.5% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 10.8% | 11.9% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -8% | -10.2% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -15.2% | -19.5% |
| Beta | 0.23 | 0.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.75 | 0.08 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.40 | 0.15 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Momentum | 82/100 | 59/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 72/100 | 66/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
SDY and SPHD are effectively level
SDY and SPHD are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate SDY and SPHD as of Oct 21, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
SDY vs SPHD: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | SDY | SPHD | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.35% | 0.3% | SPHD |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 158 | 54 | SDY |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 20.6% | 28.2% | SDY |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 2.42% | 4.91% | SPHD |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -15.2% | -19.5% | SDY |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 10.8% | 11.9% | SDY |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SDY and SPHD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum82 vs 59SDY +23
- Quality54 vs 64SPHD +10
- Risk Resilience72 vs 66SDY +6
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Value +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (2.6%)
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
SDY's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SDY and SPHD both carry a full feed there.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | SDY | SPHD | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.3% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 158 | 54 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 208,470 | 895,996 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 10.8% | 11.9% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -8% | -10.2% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.75 | 0.08 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.23 | 0.06 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
How much of the same holdings they own
SDY and SPHD share 20.1% of their weighted exposure across 16 common holdings.
140 holdings are unique to SDY, and 35 holdings are unique to SPHD. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
SPHD is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 28.23% of the fund, against 20.57% for SDY (54 holdings vs 158). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | SDY | SPHD | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| VZVerizon Communications Inc | 3.23% | 3.4% | 3.23% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.08% | 2.12% | 2.08% |
| ORealty Income Corp | 2.05% | 2.19% | 2.05% |
| PEPPepsiCo Inc | 1.91% | 1.95% | 1.91% |
| MDTMedtronic PLC | 1.85% | 1.86% | 1.85% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp | 1.42% | 1.91% | 1.42% |
| XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 1.41% | 1.46% | 1.41% |
| ESEversource Energy | 1.09% | 1.8% | 1.09% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
What SDY adds that SPHD doesn’t
| Holding | SDY | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| ACNACCENTURE PLC CL A | 3.15% | Not held |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 1.79% | Not held |
| NKENIKE INC CL B | 1.52% | Not held |
| ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING | 1.5% | Not held |
| KVUEKENVUE INC | 1.49% | Not held |
| BDXBECTON DICKINSON AND CO | 1.46% | Not held |
What SPHD adds that SDY doesn’t
| Holding | SPHD | SDY |
|---|---|---|
| PFEPfizer Inc | 3.4% | Not held |
| GISGeneral Mills Inc | 2.97% | Not held |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co/The | 2.87% | Not held |
| VICIVICI Properties Inc | 2.84% | Not held |
| TAT&T Inc | 2.72% | Not held |
| CMCSAComcast Corp | 2.63% | Not held |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
SDY vs SPHD: five-year payout growth
SDY grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 3.76% a year against SPHD's 0.98%.
| Dividend metric | SDY | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | 3.76% | 0.98% |
| 2020 annual payout | $3.022 | $1.839 |
| 2025 annual payout | $3.634 | $1.931 |
| Calendar-year declines | 1 | 2 |
| Peer rank | #22 of 33 | #31 of 33 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 63 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Not covered | Not covered |
| Technicals | SDY | Price vs 50-day 1.7% vs -1.2%; vs 200-day 3.4% vs 0% |
| Risk Resilience | SDY | Risk Resilience 72 vs 66 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 3 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
How the comparison changed
41 daily snapshots · Sep 8 – Oct 20SPHD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 63 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- SDY +1
- 63 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- SPHD +2
- 49 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- Not covered
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 15 when SDY moved ahead of SPHD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
6 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SDY
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (2.6%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only SPHD
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 6 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling, BB Upper Band Breach, Keltner Channel Breakout, RSI Overbought, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.07%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.65%, AIQ +2 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
SDY leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SDY | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3.5% | 2.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 4.1% | 2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 1.2% | -3.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 5.5% | 2.5% |
| Year to date | 12.2% | 5.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 12.9% | 5.1% |
Technicals
SDY has the stronger structure| Metric | SDY | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 82.9 | 75.5 |
| ADX (14) | 31.8 | 31 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.7% | -1.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 3.4% | 0% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 11.7% | 13% |
Risk
SDY is the more resilient| Metric | SDY | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.23 | 0.06 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.75 | 0.08 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.4 | 0.15 |
| Max drawdown | -8% | -10.2% |
| Current drawdown | -1.9% | -5.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 10.8% | 11.9% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -0.9% | -1.1% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between SDY and SPHD?
SDY and SPHD have little in common: 20% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do SDY and SPHD overlap?
SDY and SPHD share 20.1% of their weighted exposure across 16 common holdings. 140 holdings are unique to SDY, and 35 holdings are unique to SPHD. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, SDY or SPHD?
SDY holds more positions: 158 versus 54 for SPHD.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
SPHD has the lower expense ratio, 0.3% a year against 0.35% for SDY.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
SPHD, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 4.91% against 2.42% for SDY.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
SPHD has been more volatile over the past year, at 11.9% annualized against 10.8% for SDY.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
SDY fell less from peak to trough over the past five years: -15.2% against -19.5% for SPHD.
Compare SDY and SPHD with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.