SILV vs SPY Stock Comparison
SILV currently leads SPY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 71 vs 66. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between SILV and SPY?
SILV leads the current stock comparison as SilverCrest Metals Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
SilverCrest Metals Inc. vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
SILV leads
SILV leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience.
Competitive: 2 of 3 evidence groups support SILV.
SilverCrest Metals Inc.
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SILV over SPY, 71 versus 66 as of Oct 21, 2026. SILV's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience. 2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor SILV today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. SILV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare SilverCrest Metals Inc. and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SILV and SPY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience93 vs 88SILV +5
- Quality87 vs 84Even
- Value44 vs 41Even
2 of 3 evidence groups favor SILV. SILV’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
Largest factor move: Momentum +16
New signals
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
SILV's lead narrowed by 4 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SILV and SPY both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SILVSILV on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SILVSILV on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SILV | SPY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -26.4% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | 0% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | — | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | — | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor SILV. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SILV | 71 vs 66 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Even | Value 44 vs 41 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | SILV | Risk Resilience 93 vs 88 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SILV and SPY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SILV.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SILV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SILV +5
- 71 vs 66
- 7 sessions ago
- SILV +5
- 71 vs 66
- 30 sessions ago
- SILV +5
- 71 vs 66
- 90 sessions ago
- SILV +6
- 76 vs 70
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SPY
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (5.84%)
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (0.92%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.2%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
SPY is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.53%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SPY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 5 points behind, the largest single contributor to SILV's edge.
- 2SPY generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3SILV starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | SILV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 10.5% | — |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 45.5% | — |
| Gross margin | 60.5% | — |
| Operating margin | 53.6% | — |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 30.1% | — |
| Debt to equity | 0 | — |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | SILV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | — | -1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | — | -0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | — | 2.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | — | 9.2% |
| Year to date | — | 12.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | — | 16.4% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | SILV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | — | 56.2 |
| ADX (14) | — | 12.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | — | 0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | — | 5.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | — | 9% |
Risk
SILV is the more resilient| Metric | SILV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | — | 1 |
| Sharpe ratio | — | 0.91 |
| Sortino ratio | — | 1.39 |
| Max drawdown | — | -9.1% |
| Current drawdown | — | -1.3% |
| Annualized volatility | — | 12.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | — | -1.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SILV or SPY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SILV is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 71 against SPY's 66. The edge comes from risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SILV or SPY the better buy right now?
SILV carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 3 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SILV over SPY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SILV leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SILV or SPY?
Analyst price targets imply -26.4% upside for SILV and not covered for SPY. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SILV or SPY?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SILV or SPY?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SILV or SPY?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SILV or SPY?
SILV is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SILV on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SILV more profitable than SPY?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is SILV's lead over SPY getting stronger or weaker?
SILV lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the SILV vs SPY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SPY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 5 points behind, the largest single contributor to SILV's edge; SPY generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; SILV starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SILV and SPY?
SILV: No active signals. SPY: 4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. On SPY it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.