SMCY vs TSM Stock Comparison
TSM currently leads SMCY in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 58 vs 28. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between SMCY and TSM?
TSM leads the current stock comparison as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
TSM leads
TSM leads by 30 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality.
Stable: 3 of 3 evidence groups support TSM.
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TSM over SMCY, 58 versus 28 as of Oct 21, 2026. TSM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality. TSM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 3 covered evidence groups favor TSM today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability.
Compare YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare SMCY and TSM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience0 vs 67TSM +67
- Quality45 vs 98TSM +53
- Momentum24 vs 21Even
3 of 3 evidence groups favor TSM. TSM’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TSMTSM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
TSMTSM on Risk Resilience, by 67 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SMCY | TSM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +36.4% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +34% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 3 covered evidence groups favor TSM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TSM | 28 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Not covered | Not covered |
| Technicals | TSM | Price vs 50-day -15.6% vs -0.6%; vs 200-day -33.3% vs 7.3% |
| Risk Resilience | TSM | Risk Resilience 0 vs 67 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SMCY and TSM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 30 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 3 of 3 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TSM.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SMCY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 67 points behind, the largest single contributor to TSM's edge.
- 2SMCY generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3TSM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | SMCY | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | 17.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 8% |
| Gross margin | — | 65.8% |
| Operating margin | — | 57.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 41.2% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.14 |
Performance
TSM leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SMCY | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -18.7% | -4.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -26% | -6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -17.5% | 0.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -32.6% | 15.5% |
| Year to date | -49.5% | 39.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -74.1% | 41.8% |
Technicals
TSM has the stronger structure| Metric | SMCY | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 22.3 | 36.7 |
| ADX (14) | 21.9 | 21.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -15.6% | -0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -33.3% | 7.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 54.7% | 28.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SMCY or TSM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TSM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 58 against SMCY's 28. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SMCY or TSM the better buy right now?
TSM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 3 of 3 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TSM over SMCY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TSM leads Risk Resilience by 67 points; TSM leads Quality by 53 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SMCY or TSM?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for SMCY and +36.4% for TSM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SMCY or TSM?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SMCY or TSM?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SMCY or TSM?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SMCY or TSM?
TSM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TSM on Risk Resilience, by 67 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SMCY more profitable than TSM?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
What would change the SMCY vs TSM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SMCY closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 67 points behind, the largest single contributor to TSM's edge; SMCY generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; TSM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.