SOXL vs SOXX: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk

SOXL and SOXX are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. SOXL is Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF, while SOXX is iShares Semiconductor ETF. SOXL is broader by holdings count, with 43 positions versus 33 for SOXX. SOXX has the lower expense ratio. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has SOXX ahead on AIQ Score, 36 versus 33.

Market data as of Oct 21, 2026 market close· Fund characteristics as of Oct 21, 2026
SOXL
Direxion
vs
SOXX
IShares
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
Issuer
Direxion
Inception
2010-03-11
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
Issuer
IShares
Inception
2001-07-10
Expense ratio
SOXL
0.91%
SOXX
0.33%
Lower annual fund costSOXX
Holdings
SOXL
43
SOXX
33
Broader reported basketSOXL
1Y return
SOXL
+144%
SOXX
+73.9%
Trailing performanceSOXL
Annualized volatility
SOXL
135.5%
SOXX
46%
Lower realized volatilitySOXX
MetricSOXLSOXX
Fund
Expense ratio0.91%0.33%
Holdings4333
Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months0.1%0.25%
Average volume64,443,5038,752,412
Performance
1Y return+144%+73.9%
YTD return+132.1%+66%
5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested+18%+27.6%
Risk
Annualized volatility135.5%46%
Max drawdown (1Y)-69.4%-29%
Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested-90.5%-45.8%
Beta7.732.62
Sharpe ratio1.311.35
Sortino ratio1.911.97
AlgovestIQ
AIQ Score33/10036/100
AIQ Edge Score1/102/10
Momentum8/10015/100
Risk Resilience0/10023/100

AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF vs iShares Semiconductor ETF

Data as of Oct 21, 2026· market close· Coverage 64/66 fields· High confidence
AIQ VerdictFragileAIQ Comparison Conviction 3/10

SOXX leads

SOXX leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum.

Fragile: 2 of 4 evidence groups support SOXX, and its current signal state is conflicted.

Evidence agreement: 2 of 4Comparison trend: Stable
SOXL

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF

AIQ Score
33/100
AIQ Edge Score
1/10
SOXX

iShares Semiconductor ETF

Leads
AIQ Score
36/100
AIQ Edge Score
2/10

The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SOXX over SOXL, 36 versus 33 as of Oct 21, 2026. SOXX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum, while SOXL holds the stronger quality profile. SOXX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SOXX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. SOXX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.

Compare Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF and iShares Semiconductor ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.

SOXL vs SOXX: which fits what

Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.

If you wantSOXLSOXXFits
Lower costExpense ratio0.91%0.33%SOXX
Broader diversificationNumber of holdings4333SOXL
Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield0.1%0.25%Similar
Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years-90.5%-45.8%SOXX
Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year135.5%46%SOXX

Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.

Currently unavailable

Performance over time

Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.

SOXL
+128.3%
SOXX
+237.3%

Total return comparison

Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested

SOXL $22,830 · SOXX $33,731

Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.

Compare SOXL and SOXX against another ticker

Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.

Basic: 2 symbols·Explorer: 3 symbols·Pro and Premium: 5 symbols·Your limit: 2

AIQ Factor Divergence

Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.

SOXL advantage
0
SOXX advantage
  • Risk Resilience0 vs 23
    SOXX +23
  • Momentum8 vs 15
    SOXX +7
  • Quality75 vs 70
    SOXL +5
  • Value29 vs 25
    SOXL +4

2 of 4 evidence groups favor SOXX. SOXX’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum; SOXL keeps a meaningful quality edge.

What changed since the last close

Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.

SOXL-1 AIQ

Largest factor move: Value -1

No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.

SOXX0 AIQ

Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.

No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.

SOXX's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.

Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SOXL and SOXX both carry a full feed there.

The central trade-off

SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and momentum.

SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF): the counter-case, on quality, value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 90.4% against 30%.

Fund facts, side by side

Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.

MeasureSOXLSOXXWhy it matters
Expense ratio0.91%0.33%Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold.
Holdings4333More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns.
Average volume64,443,5038,752,412Liquidity — matters most if you trade size.
Annualized volatility135.5%46%Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure.
Max drawdown (1Y)-69.4%-29%The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year.
Sharpe ratio1.311.35Return per unit of risk. Higher is better.
Beta7.732.62Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio.

Where the exposure actually sits

Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.

Technology100.0% vs 0.0%
Semiconductors0.0% vs 83.1%
Semiconductor Equipment0.0% vs 16.9%
Cash and/or Derivatives0.0% vs 0.1%
SOXLSOXX

SOXL vs SOXX: five-year payout growth

SOXL grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 57.06% a year against SOXX's 10.93%. SOXL: The 2020 payout was 78.4% below 2019, so the growth rate measures a recovery from a weak starting year. SOXL: The payout jumped 241.7% in 2022, a single step rather than steady compounding - often an index or mandate change.

Dividend metricSOXLSOXX
5Y payout CAGR57.06%10.93%
2020 annual payout$0.015$0.342
2025 annual payout$0.143$0.574
Calendar-year declines11
Peer rank#6 of 138#53 of 138

Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.

AIQ Agreement Matrix

2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SOXX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.

Evidence groupFavorsReading
AIQ ScoreEven33 vs 36
FundamentalsNot coveredNot covered
ValuationSOXLValue 29 vs 25
TechnicalsSOXXPrice vs 50-day -19.3% vs -4.8%; vs 200-day -20.4% vs 6.5%
Risk ResilienceSOXXRisk Resilience 0 vs 23
Analyst expectationsNot coveredNot covered

✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SOXL and SOXX and are excluded from the count.

AIQ Decision Stability

Fragile

The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.

  • The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • Only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
  • The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
  • The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)

Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SOXX.

How the comparison changed

120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20

SOXX lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.

Jun 21SOXL leads above the line · SOXX leads belowOct 20
Today
SOXX +3
33 vs 36
7 sessions ago
SOXX +2
33 vs 35
30 sessions ago
SOXX +2
51 vs 53
90 sessions ago
SOXL +2
52 vs 50

The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 18 when SOXX moved ahead of SOXL.

AIQ Signal Divergence

Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.

SOXL and SOXX carry the same 5 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, MACD Bearish Crossover.

SOXX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.

Price vs model alignment

Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.

SOXLDivergence

Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +5.83%, AIQ -1 points).

SOXXNo material change

Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.07%, AIQ 0 points).

What would flip this result

A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.

  1. 1SOXL closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to SOXX's edge.
  2. 2SOXL's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
  3. 3SOXX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
  4. 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.

The full evidence

Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.

Performance

SOXX leads 4 of 6 windows
MetricSOXLSOXX
1 week (5 sessions)-23.5%-8.1%
1 month (20 sessions)-35.8%-12.7%
3 months (63 sessions)-39.4%-10%
6 months (126 sessions)2.3%18.9%
Year to date132.1%66%
1 year (252 sessions)144%73.9%

Technicals

SOXX has the stronger structure
MetricSOXLSOXX
RSI (14)24.124.2
ADX (14)22.422
Price vs 50-day-19.3%-4.8%
Price vs 200-day-20.4%6.5%
Volatility (1M, annualized)90.4%30%

Risk

SOXX is the more resilient
MetricSOXLSOXX
Beta7.732.62
Sharpe ratio1.311.35
Sortino ratio1.911.97
Max drawdown-69.4%-29%
Current drawdown-67.6%-23.7%
Annualized volatility135.5%46%
Value at risk (95%)-14.4%-4.8%

Straight answers

Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.

Which ETF is more diversified, SOXL or SOXX?

SOXL holds more positions: 43 versus 33 for SOXX.

Which has the lower expense ratio?

SOXX has the lower expense ratio, 0.33% a year against 0.91% for SOXL.

Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?

Their trailing 12-month distribution yields are similar: 0.1% for SOXL and 0.25% for SOXX.

Which ETF has been more volatile?

SOXL has been more volatile over the past year, at 135.5% annualized against 46% for SOXX.

Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?

SOXX fell less from peak to trough over the past five years: -45.8% against -90.5% for SOXL.

Compare SOXL and SOXX with others

Continue your research

This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.

How this comparison is scored

The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.

The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.

How to use side-by-side comparison →

This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.