SOXL vs SSO ETF Comparison
Compare SOXL and SSO across fund costs, diversification, holdings, performance, income, risk and current AlgovestIQ evidence.
What is the main difference between SOXL and SSO?
SOXL is Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF, while SSO is ProShares - Ultra S&P500. SOXL is tied to Equity; SSO is tied to Equity. SSO is broader by holdings count, with 504 positions versus 30 for SOXL. SSO is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight.
| Metric | SOXL | SSO | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.91% | 0.88% | Fund |
| Assets under management | $18.2B | $9.0B | Fund |
| Holdings | 30 | 504 | Fund |
| Top-10 concentration | 20.7% | 52.8% | Fund |
| Average volume | 81,412,126 | 2,285,247 | Fund |
| Underlying exposure | Equity | Equity | Fund |
| Annualized volatility | 133.5% | 25.6% | Risk |
| Max drawdown | -69.4% | -18.3% | Risk |
| Beta | 7.68 | 1.99 | Risk |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.75 | 1.19 | Risk |
| Sortino ratio | 2.44 | 1.70 | Risk |
| AIQ Score | 42/100 | 51/100 | AlgovestIQ |
| AIQ Edge Score | 2/10 | 4/10 | AlgovestIQ |
| Momentum | 24/100 | 57/100 | AlgovestIQ |
| Risk Resilience | 0/100 | 45/100 | AlgovestIQ |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF vs ProShares - Ultra S&P500
SSO leads
SSO leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum.
Competitive: 3 of 4 evidence groups support SSO, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF
ProShares - Ultra S&P500
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SSO over SOXL, 51 versus 42 as of Sep 5, 2026. SSO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum, while SOXL holds the stronger quality profile. SSO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SSO today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. SSO lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF and ProShares - Ultra S&P500 across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
Compare SOXL and SSO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience15%0 vs 45SSO +45
- Momentum25%24 vs 57SSO +33
- Quality30%76 vs 62SOXL +14
- Value30%45 vs 37SOXL +8
3 of 4 evidence groups favor SSO. SSO’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum; SOXL keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
New signals
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.7%)
SSO's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SOXL and SSO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SSO (ProShares - Ultra S&P500): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and momentum.
SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF): the counter-case, on quality, value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 93.2% against 16.5%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SSOSSO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
SOXLSOXL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points.
Momentum
SSOSSO on the Momentum factor, by 33 points.
Lower downside
SSOSSO on Risk Resilience, by 45 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | SOXL | SSO | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.91% | 0.88% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Assets under management | $18.2B | $9.0B | Larger funds generally carry tighter spreads. |
| Holdings | 44 | 521 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 81,412,126 | 2,285,247 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 133.5% | 25.6% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown | -69.4% | -18.3% | The worst peak-to-trough loss on record for the fund. |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.75 | 1.19 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 7.68 | 1.99 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
SOXL and SSO share 11.98% of their weighted exposure across 18 common holdings.
SSO is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 52.79% of the fund, against 20.69% for SOXL (504 holdings vs 30). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
12 holdings are unique to SOXL and 486 to SSO. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | SOXL | SSO | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.5% | 2.23% | 2.23% |
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 1.92% | 5.7% | 1.92% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.13% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 1.42% | 1.74% | 1.42% |
| INTCINTEL CORP | 2.05% | 0.93% | 0.93% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.63% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.71% | 0.71% | 0.71% |
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.47% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
ETF comparison questions
Short answers to the fund-specific questions behind this comparison.
Which ETF is more diversified, SOXL or SSO?
SSO currently has more reported holdings, with 504 positions versus 30.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
SSO has the lower reported expense ratio in the current fund profile.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
The current dataset does not show a higher-yield winner.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
SOXL has the higher annualized volatility in the current risk snapshot.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
SSO has the less severe max drawdown in the current risk snapshot.
Which ETF has the stronger current AlgovestIQ evidence?
SSO currently leads on supporting AlgovestIQ evidence, 51 to 42.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SSO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SSO | 42 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | SOXL | Value 45 vs 37 |
| Technicals | SSO | Price vs 50-day -20.7% vs 3%; vs 200-day -1.5% vs 15% |
| Risk Resilience | SSO | Risk Resilience 0 vs 45 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SOXL and SSO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SSO.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3SSO lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SSO +9
- 42 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- SSO +4
- 46 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- SSO +8
- 47 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- SSO +5
- 46 vs 51
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Jun 26 when SSO moved ahead of SOXL.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (36.43%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (12.96%)
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (10.74%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
SSO leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +9.87%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.8%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SOXL closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to SSO's edge.
- 2SOXL's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SSO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Technicals
SSO has the stronger structure| Metric | SOXL | SSO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.8 | 45.5 |
| ADX (14) | 20.1 | 13 |
| Price vs 50-day | -20.7% | 3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.5% | 15% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 93.2% | 16.5% |
Risk
SSO is the more resilient| Metric | SOXL | SSO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 7.68 | 1.99 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.75 | 1.19 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.44 | 1.7 |
| Max drawdown | -69.4% | -18.3% |
| Current drawdown | -64.5% | -1.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 133.5% | 25.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -14.4% | -2.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SOXL or SSO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SSO is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 51 against SOXL's 42. The edge comes from risk resilience and momentum. SOXL is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SOXL or SSO the better buy right now?
SSO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SSO over SOXL?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. SSO leads Risk Resilience by 45 points; SSO leads Momentum by 33 points; SOXL leads Quality by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which is better value, SOXL or SSO?
SOXL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SOXL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 8 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SOXL or SSO?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SOXL or SSO?
SSO on the Momentum factor, by 33 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SOXL or SSO?
SSO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SSO on Risk Resilience, by 45 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SOXL more profitable than SSO?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is SSO's lead over SOXL getting stronger or weaker?
SSO lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-26, when SSO moved ahead of SOXL.
What would change the SOXL vs SSO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: SOXL closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 45 points behind, the largest single contributor to SSO's edge; SOXL's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SSO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about SOXL and SSO?
SOXL: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SSO: 4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SOXL is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SSO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SOXL and SSO with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.