SPHD vs VOO: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
SPHD and VOO are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. SPHD is Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF, while VOO is Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. VOO is broader by holdings count, with 508 positions versus 54 for SPHD. VOO is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has VOO ahead on AIQ Score, 64 versus 63.
What is the main difference between SPHD and VOO?
VOO holds 508 positions to SPHD's 54, and 6% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | SPHD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.3% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 54 | 508 |
| Top-10 concentration | 28.2% | 37.6% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 4.91% | 1.05% |
| Average volume | 895,996 | 7,814,237 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | +5.1% | +16.4% |
| YTD return | +5.5% | +12.7% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +7.5% | +12.7% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 11.9% | 12.8% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -10.2% | -9.2% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -19.5% | -24.5% |
| Beta | 0.06 | 1.00 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.08 | 0.91 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.15 | 1.38 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Momentum | 59/100 | 64/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 66/100 | 87/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VOO leads
VOO leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 13 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 3 evidence groups support VOO, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VOO over SPHD, 64 versus 63 as of Oct 21, 2026. VOO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality. VOO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor VOO today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. VOO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
SPHD vs VOO: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | SPHD | VOO | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.3% | 0.03% | VOO |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 54 | 508 | VOO |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 28.2% | 37.6% | SPHD |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 4.91% | 1.05% | SPHD |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -19.5% | -24.5% | SPHD |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 11.9% | 12.8% | Similar |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SPHD and VOO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience66 vs 87VOO +21
- Quality64 vs 77VOO +13
- Momentum59 vs 64VOO +5
2 of 3 evidence groups favor VOO. VOO’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +17
New signals
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
The lead changed hands: VOO moved ahead of SPHD in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SPHD and VOO both carry a full feed there.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | SPHD | VOO | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.3% | 0.03% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 54 | 508 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 895,996 | 7,814,237 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 11.9% | 12.8% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -10.2% | -9.2% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.08 | 0.91 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.06 | 1.00 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
How much of the same holdings they own
SPHD and VOO share 5.63% of their weighted exposure across 50 common holdings.
1 holding is unique to SPHD, and 455 holdings are unique to VOO. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
VOO is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 37.65% of the fund, against 28.23% for SPHD (508 holdings vs 54). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | SPHD | VOO | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 1.46% | 1% | 1% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.12% | 0.57% | 0.57% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc | 3.4% | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| PEPPepsiCo Inc | 1.95% | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| TAT&T Inc | 2.72% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| COPConocoPhillips | 1.67% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 3.4% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co | 2.09% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
What SPHD adds that VOO doesn’t
| Holding | SPHD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| VZVerizon Communications Inc | 3.4% | 0.3% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 3.4% | 0.22% |
| GISGeneral Mills Inc | 2.97% | 0.03% |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co/The | 2.87% | 0.03% |
| VICIVICI Properties Inc | 2.84% | 0.04% |
| TAT&T Inc | 2.72% | 0.25% |
What VOO adds that SPHD doesn’t
| Holding | VOO | SPHD |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 7.55% | Not held |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.05% | Not held |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.36% | Not held |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 4.13% | Not held |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.24% | Not held |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.86% | Not held |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
SPHD vs VOO: five-year payout growth
VOO grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 5.91% a year against SPHD's 0.98%. VOO never reduced its annual distribution in the window; SPHD did in 2 years.
| Dividend metric | SPHD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | 0.98% | 5.91% |
| 2020 annual payout | $1.839 | $5.303 |
| 2025 annual payout | $1.931 | $7.068 |
| Calendar-year declines | 2 | 0 |
| Peer rank | #31 of 33 | #88 of 138 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 3 covered evidence groups favor VOO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 63 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | Not covered | Not covered |
| Technicals | VOO | Price vs 50-day -1.2% vs 0.6%; vs 200-day 0% vs 5.9% |
| Risk Resilience | VOO | Risk Resilience 66 vs 87 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPHD and VOO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VOO.
How the comparison changed
45 daily snapshots · Sep 6 – Oct 20VOO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- VOO +1
- 63 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- VOO +1
- 62 vs 63
- 30 sessions ago
- VOO +13
- 51 vs 64
- 90 sessions ago
- Not covered
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 20 when VOO moved ahead of SPHD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only SPHD
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only VOO
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.2%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling.
VOO leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.65%, AIQ +2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.55%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SPHD closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to VOO's edge.
- 2SPHD's BB Upper Band Breach resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3VOO's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 12 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate VOO's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
VOO leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | SPHD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.7% | -1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2% | -0.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.4% | 2.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.5% | 9.2% |
| Year to date | 5.5% | 12.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 5.1% | 16.4% |
Technicals
VOO has the stronger structure| Metric | SPHD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 75.5 | 56.2 |
| ADX (14) | 31 | 12.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.2% | 0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0% | 5.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13% | 9.4% |
Risk
VOO is the more resilient| Metric | SPHD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.06 | 1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.08 | 0.91 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.15 | 1.38 |
| Max drawdown | -10.2% | -9.2% |
| Current drawdown | -5.4% | -1.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 11.9% | 12.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.1% | -1.4% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between SPHD and VOO?
VOO holds 508 positions to SPHD's 54, and 6% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do SPHD and VOO overlap?
SPHD and VOO share 5.63% of their weighted exposure across 50 common holdings. 1 holding is unique to SPHD, and 455 holdings are unique to VOO. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, SPHD or VOO?
VOO holds more positions: 508 versus 54 for SPHD.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
VOO has the lower expense ratio, 0.03% a year against 0.3% for SPHD.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
SPHD, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 4.91% against 1.05% for VOO.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
Their volatility over the past year is similar: 11.9% annualized for SPHD and 12.8% for VOO.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
SPHD fell less from peak to trough over the past five years: -19.5% against -24.5% for VOO.
Compare SPHD and VOO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.