SPIB vs VCIT: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
SPIB and VCIT are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. SPIB is State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF, while VCIT is Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF. SPIB is broader by holdings count, with 5,353 positions versus 2,285 for VCIT. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has VCIT ahead on AIQ Score, 62 versus 56.
What is the main difference between SPIB and VCIT?
SPIB and VCIT have little in common: 34% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | SPIB | VCIT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 5,353 | 2,285 |
| Top-10 concentration | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 4.63% | 5.06% |
| Average volume | 6,369,091 | 9,973,564 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | -4.8% | -6.8% |
| YTD return | -4.2% | -5.9% |
| 5Y annualized returnTotal return, distributions reinvested | +1.6% | +0.7% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 3.3% | 4.6% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -5.7% | -8.1% |
| Max drawdown (5Y)Total return, distributions reinvested | -14% | -19.7% |
| Beta | 0.11 | 0.17 |
| Sharpe ratio | -2.63 | -2.33 |
| Sortino ratio | -3.48 | -3.17 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 56/100 | 62/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Momentum | 51/100 | 52/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 85/100 | 90/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
VCIT leads
VCIT leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality.
Competitive: 3 of 4 evidence groups support VCIT, and its current signal state is conflicted.
State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VCIT over SPIB, 62 versus 56 as of Oct 21, 2026. VCIT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality. VCIT also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor VCIT today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. VCIT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
SPIB vs VCIT: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | SPIB | VCIT | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% | Similar |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 5,353 | 2,285 | SPIB |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 2.6% | 2.7% | Similar |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 4.63% | 5.06% | VCIT |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 5 years | -14% | -19.7% | SPIB |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 3.3% | 4.6% | SPIB |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SPIB and VCIT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value36 vs 45VCIT +9
- Quality66 vs 73VCIT +7
- Risk Resilience85 vs 90VCIT +5
- Momentum51 vs 52Even
3 of 4 evidence groups favor VCIT. VCIT’s edge is concentrated in value and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
VCIT's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SPIB and VCIT both carry a full feed there.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | SPIB | VCIT | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 5,353 | 2,285 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 6,369,091 | 9,973,564 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 3.3% | 4.6% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -5.7% | -8.1% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | -2.63 | -2.33 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.11 | 0.17 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.
How much of the same holdings they own
SPIB and VCIT share 34.3% of their weighted exposure across 2,124 common holdings.
3,227 holdings are unique to SPIB, and 156 holdings are unique to VCIT. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
VCIT is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 2.66% of the fund, against 2.65% for SPIB (2,285 holdings vs 5,353). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | SPIB | VCIT | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 4.91% 07/25/2033 | 0.18% | 0.25% | 0.18% |
| Space Exploration Technologies Corp 5.88% 07/15/2036 | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.16% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 5.58% 07/23/2036 | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.16% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 5.07% 01/21/2037 | 0.13% | 0.24% | 0.13% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE + CO SUBORDINATED 02/37 VAR | 0.19% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| Wells Fargo & Co 5.61% 04/23/2036 | 0.12% | 0.18% | 0.12% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 4.50% 08/10/2033 | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 4.88% 11/15/2035 | 0.11% | 0.26% | 0.11% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
What SPIB adds that VCIT doesn’t
| Holding | SPIB | VCIT |
|---|---|---|
| MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA SR UNSECURED 01/29 VAR | 0.44% | Not held |
| AMAZON.COM INC SR UNSECURED 07/31 4.8 | 0.39% | Not held |
| NVIDIA CORP SR UNSECURED 06/31 4.5 | 0.27% | Not held |
| ABBVIE INC SR UNSECURED 08/28 4.5 | 0.25% | Not held |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC SR UNSECURED 08/32 VAR | 0.24% | Not held |
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA SR UNSECURED 11/31 VAR | 0.24% | Not held |
What VCIT adds that SPIB doesn’t
| Holding | VCIT | SPIB |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc 4.88% 03/13/2036 | 0.29% | 0.1% |
| Boeing Co/The 6.53% 05/01/2034 | 0.28% | 0.04% |
| Bank of America Corp 5.01% 07/22/2033 | 0.27% | 0.08% |
| Space Exploration Technologies Corp 5.65% 07/15/2033 | 0.27% | 0.1% |
| Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc 4.70 | 0.27% | 0.08% |
| Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 4.75% 05/19/2033 | 0.26% | 0.08% |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor VCIT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | VCIT | 56 vs 62 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | VCIT | Value 36 vs 45 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -0.9% vs -1.2%; vs 200-day -2.8% vs -4% |
| Risk Resilience | VCIT | Risk Resilience 85 vs 90 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPIB and VCIT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VCIT.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20VCIT lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- VCIT +6
- 56 vs 62
- 7 sessions ago
- VCIT +5
- 55 vs 60
- 30 sessions ago
- VCIT +6
- 49 vs 55
- 90 sessions ago
- VCIT +5
- 53 vs 58
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only VCIT
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 5 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling, 52-Week Low Proximity, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
VCIT leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.03%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.03%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SPIB closes the Value gap — currently 9 points behind, the largest single contributor to VCIT's edge.
- 2SPIB's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3VCIT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
SPIB leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | SPIB | VCIT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.9% | -1.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2.2% | -3.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -3.7% | -5.3% |
| Year to date | -4.2% | -5.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -4.8% | -6.8% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | SPIB | VCIT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 60.7 | 62.3 |
| ADX (14) | 28.1 | 30.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.9% | -1.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -2.8% | -4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 3.8% | 5.7% |
Risk
VCIT is the more resilient| Metric | SPIB | VCIT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.11 | 0.17 |
| Sharpe ratio | -2.63 | -2.33 |
| Sortino ratio | -3.48 | -3.17 |
| Max drawdown | -5.7% | -8.1% |
| Current drawdown | -5% | -7.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 3.3% | 4.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -0.4% | -0.6% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between SPIB and VCIT?
SPIB and VCIT have little in common: 34% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do SPIB and VCIT overlap?
SPIB and VCIT share 34.3% of their weighted exposure across 2,124 common holdings. 3,227 holdings are unique to SPIB, and 156 holdings are unique to VCIT. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, SPIB or VCIT?
SPIB holds more positions: 5,353 versus 2,285 for VCIT.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
The two are within a basis point: 0.04% for SPIB and 0.03% for VCIT.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
VCIT, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 5.06% against 4.63% for SPIB.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
VCIT has been more volatile over the past year, at 4.6% annualized against 3.3% for SPIB.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
SPIB fell less from peak to trough over the past five years: -14% against -19.7% for VCIT.
Compare SPIB and VCIT with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.