SPMD vs SPYM: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
SPMD and SPYM are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. SPMD is State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF, while SPYM is State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF. SPYM is broader by holdings count, with 508 positions versus 403 for SPMD. SPYM is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has SPYM ahead on AIQ Score, 64 versus 60.
What is the main difference between SPMD and SPYM?
SPMD and SPYM have little in common: 0% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | SPMD | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.02% |
| Holdings | 403 | 508 |
| Top-10 concentration | 7.8% | 38.1% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 1.31% | 1.01% |
| Average volume | 1,537,217 | 13,181,341 |
| Performance | ||
| YTD return | +10.6% | +12.9% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 15.1% | 12.7% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -9.2% | -9.1% |
| Beta | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.65 | 0.74 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.09 | 1.15 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 60/100 | 64/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Momentum | 55/100 | 66/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 83/100 | 87/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
SPYM leads
SPYM leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 4 evidence groups support SPYM, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPYM over SPMD, 64 versus 60 as of Oct 21, 2026. SPYM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while SPMD holds the stronger value profile. SPYM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPYM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. SPYM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
SPMD vs SPYM: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | SPMD | SPYM | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.03% | 0.02% | Similar |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 403 | 508 | SPYM |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 7.8% | 38.1% | SPMD |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 1.31% | 1.01% | SPMD |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 1 year | -9.2% | -9.1% | Similar |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 15.1% | 12.7% | SPYM |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare SPMD and SPYM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality61 vs 75SPYM +14
- Momentum55 vs 66SPYM +11
- Value51 vs 41SPMD +10
- Risk Resilience83 vs 87SPYM +4
3 of 4 evidence groups favor SPYM. SPYM’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; SPMD keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +13
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +16
New signals
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
SPYM's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SPMD and SPYM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
SPMD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF): the counter-case, on value, valuation.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | SPMD | SPYM | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.02% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 403 | 508 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 1,537,217 | 13,181,341 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 15.1% | 12.7% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -9.2% | -9.1% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.65 | 0.74 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.95 | 1.00 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.
How much of the same holdings they own
SPMD and SPYM share 0% of their weighted exposure across 0 common holdings.
401 holdings are unique to SPMD, and 506 holdings are unique to SPYM. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
SPYM is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 38.1% of the fund, against 7.8% for SPMD (508 holdings vs 403). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
What SPMD adds that SPYM doesn’t
| Holding | SPMD | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| TWLOTWILIO INC A | 1% | Not held |
| ILMNILLUMINA INC | 0.87% | Not held |
| FTITECHNIPFMC PLC | 0.86% | Not held |
| PEVERPURE INC A | 0.85% | Not held |
| OKTAOKTA INC | 0.82% | Not held |
| ATIATI INC | 0.78% | Not held |
What SPYM adds that SPMD doesn’t
| Holding | SPYM | SPMD |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 8.07% | Not held |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 7.32% | Not held |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 5.58% | Not held |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.76% | Not held |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC CL A | 2.98% | Not held |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 2.61% | Not held |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
SPMD vs SPYM: five-year payout growth
SPMD grew its split-adjusted payout faster over 2020-2025 — 8.89% a year against SPYM's 6.04%. Neither fund reduced its annual distribution in any year of the window.
| Dividend metric | SPMD | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y payout CAGR | 8.89% | 6.04% |
| 2020 annual payout | $0.525 | $0.677 |
| 2025 annual payout | $0.804 | $0.907 |
| Calendar-year declines | 0 | 0 |
| Peer rank | #64 of 138 | #86 of 138 |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPYM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SPYM | 60 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | SPMD | Value 51 vs 41 |
| Technicals | SPYM | Price vs 50-day -1.6% vs 0.6%; vs 200-day 0.3% vs 6% |
| Risk Resilience | SPYM | Risk Resilience 83 vs 87 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPMD and SPYM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPYM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SPYM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SPYM +4
- 60 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- SPYM +6
- 58 vs 64
- 30 sessions ago
- SPYM +11
- 53 vs 64
- 90 sessions ago
- SPYM +2
- 64 vs 66
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Aug 24 when SPYM moved ahead of SPMD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
Only SPMD
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only SPYM
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.2%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 3 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Golden Cross Active, ATR Contraction - Coiling.
SPYM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.39%, AIQ +3 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.51%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SPMD closes the Quality gap — currently 14 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPYM's edge.
- 2SPMD's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SPYM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate SPYM's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
SPYM leads 3 of 5 windows| Metric | SPMD | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.2% | -1.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.5% | -0.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.5% | 2.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 0.2% | 9.2% |
| Year to date | 10.6% | 12.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 13.6% | — |
Technicals
SPYM has the stronger structure| Metric | SPMD | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.6 | 56.2 |
| ADX (14) | 39.9 | 12.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.6% | 0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.3% | 6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 12.6% | 9.1% |
Risk
SPYM is the more resilient| Metric | SPMD | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.95 | 1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.65 | 0.74 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.09 | 1.15 |
| Max drawdown | -9.2% | -9.1% |
| Current drawdown | -7.1% | -1.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 15.1% | 12.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.6% | -1.4% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between SPMD and SPYM?
SPMD and SPYM have little in common: 0% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do SPMD and SPYM overlap?
SPMD and SPYM share 0% of their weighted exposure across 0 common holdings. 401 holdings are unique to SPMD, and 506 holdings are unique to SPYM. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, SPMD or SPYM?
SPYM holds more positions: 508 versus 403 for SPMD.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
The two are within a basis point: 0.03% for SPMD and 0.02% for SPYM.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
SPMD, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 1.31% against 1.01% for SPYM.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
SPMD has been more volatile over the past year, at 15.1% annualized against 12.7% for SPYM.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
Their worst peak-to-trough falls over the past year are similar: -9.2% for SPMD and -9.1% for SPYM.
Compare SPMD and SPYM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.