SPY vs HOOD Stock Comparison
SPY currently leads HOOD in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 66 vs 34. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between SPY and HOOD?
SPY leads the current stock comparison as State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF, with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF vs Robinhood Markets, Inc.
SPY leads
SPY leads by 32 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum.
Stable: 4 of 4 evidence groups support SPY.
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPY over HOOD, 66 versus 34 as of Oct 21, 2026. SPY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum. SPY also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPY today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. SPY leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF and Robinhood Markets, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare SPY and HOOD against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience88 vs 30SPY +58
- Momentum63 vs 26SPY +37
- Quality84 vs 53SPY +31
- Value41 vs 24SPY +17
4 of 4 evidence groups favor SPY. SPY’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SPYSPY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
SPYSPY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points.
Momentum
SPYSPY on the Momentum factor, by 37 points.
Lower downside
SPYSPY on Risk Resilience, by 58 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SPY | HOOD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +24.5% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +69.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 20 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SPY | 66 vs 34 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | SPY | Value 41 vs 24 |
| Technicals | SPY | Price vs 50-day 0.6% vs -6.3%; vs 200-day 5.9% vs 4.9% |
| Risk Resilience | SPY | Risk Resilience 88 vs 30 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPY and HOOD and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 32 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 4 of 4 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPY.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1HOOD closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 58 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPY's edge.
- 2HOOD generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3SPY starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | SPY | HOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -49.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 59% |
| Gross margin | — | 78.7% |
| Operating margin | — | 30.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 22.7% |
| Debt to equity | — | 2.92 |
Performance
SPY leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | SPY | HOOD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.2% | -11.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | -21% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.9% | -6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 9.2% | 13.6% |
| Year to date | 12.8% | -13.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 16.4% | -25.3% |
Technicals
SPY has the stronger structure| Metric | SPY | HOOD |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 56.2 | 30.4 |
| ADX (14) | 12.5 | 17.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.6% | -6.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.9% | 4.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 9% | 43.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SPY or HOOD?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SPY is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 66 against HOOD's 34. The edge comes from risk resilience and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SPY or HOOD the better buy right now?
SPY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SPY over HOOD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SPY leads Risk Resilience by 58 points; SPY leads Momentum by 37 points; SPY leads Quality by 31 points. SPY leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by HOOD simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, SPY or HOOD?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for SPY and +24.5% for HOOD. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SPY or HOOD?
SPY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SPY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 17 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SPY or HOOD?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SPY or HOOD?
SPY on the Momentum factor, by 37 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SPY or HOOD?
SPY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SPY on Risk Resilience, by 58 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SPY more profitable than HOOD?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
What would change the SPY vs HOOD verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HOOD closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 58 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPY's edge; HOOD generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; SPY starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.